SpringerLink
Log in

Netzwerke in der Innovations- und Wissensmanagementpraxis

Handbuch Netzwerkforschung

Part of the book series: Netzwerkforschung ((NETZFO))

  • 60 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Es ist ein grundlegendes Paradigma des Innovations- und Wissensmanagements, dass die Entstehung, Speicherung und Verwertung von Wissen und Ideen geplant und organisiert werden können. Neues Wissen und Innovationen entstehen dabei nicht in sozialer und organisatorischer Isolation, getrennt von den Beziehungsstrukturen der Erfinder*innen und den zugrunde liegenden sozialen sowie organisatorischen Prozessen. Entsprechend wird im folgenden Kapitel argumentiert, dass eine relationale Perspektive auf Innovations- und Wissensmanagement, welche die gelebten zugrunde liegenden Beziehungsstrukturen und Beziehungsinhalte betrachtet, hilfreiche Ansatzpunkte für eine Innovations- und Wissensmanagementpraxis bietet. Um dieses Argument zu verdeutlichen, wird aufgezeigt, welche Wirkungen unterschiedliche soziale Netzwerke auf die Innovativität von Organisationen und Individuen haben und wie Organisationen die zugrunde liegenden Wissensnetzwerke gestalten können.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

     Ableitend aus den klassischen Managementfunktionen kann Wissensmanagement als der Prozess der systematischen Planung, Durchführung, Steuerung und Kontrolle der Erstellung, Weitergabe und Nutzung von Informationen und Wissens verstanden werden (vgl. Girard und Girard 2015). Girard und Girard (2015) weisen jedoch auf die Vielfältigkeit der Definitionen von Wissensmanagement hin. Äquivalent hierzu wird Innovationsmanagement mit der systematischen Planung, Durchführung, Steuerung und Kontrolle von Innovationsprozessen in und zwischen Unternehmen assoziiert.

  2. 2.

    AB = (Knowledge network) AND (SO = (SOCIAL NETWORKS) OR SO = (Organization Studies) OR SO = (Organization Science) OR SO = (Journal of Knowledge Management) OR SO = (Journal of Innovation & Knowledge) OR SO = (Academy of Management Journal) OR SO = (Academy of Management Review))

Literatur

  • Ahmed, Sahrish, Hasliza Abdul Halim, und Noor Hazlina Ahmad. 2018. Open and closed innovation and enhanced performance of SME hospitals – A conceptual model. Business Perspectives and Research 6:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, Nicholas, Luis A. Rios, und Brian S. Silverman. 2020. Organizational change and the dynamics of innovation: Formal R&D structure and intrafirm inventor networks. Strategic Management Journal 41:2015–2049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B., und Maryann P. Feldman. 1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review 86:630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamel, Nisha, Vijay Pereira, Umesh Bamel, und Giuseppe Cappiello. 2021. Knowledge management within a strategic alliances context: Past, present and future. Journal of Knowledge Management 25:1782–1810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, Harald, und Johannes Glückler. 2005. Resources in economic geography: From substantive concepts towards a relational perspective. Environment and Planning 37:1545–1563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, Harald, und Johannes Glückler. 2011. The relational economy: Geographies of knowing and learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, Harald, Anders Malmberg, und Peter Maskell. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28:31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, Julian. 2001. Strategies for managing internal competition. California Management Review 44:21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, Tonya, und Ram Ganeshan. 2008. Knowledge acquisition and transfer among engineers: Effects of network structure. Managerial and Decision Economics 29:459–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, Stephen P., Candace Jones, und Martin G. Everett. 1998. Network measures of social capital. Connections 21(2): 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, Stephen P., Ajay Mehra, Daniel J. Brass, und Giuseppe Labianca. 2009. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323:892–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brailly, Julien. 2016. Dynamics of networks in trade fairs – A multilevel relational approach to the cooperation among competitors. Journal of Economic Geography 16:1279–1301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, Stefano, und Francesco Lissoni. 2001. Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change 10:975–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. „Cross-firm“ inventors and social networks: Localized knowledge spillovers revisited. Annales d’Économie et de Statistique 79:189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald S. 1987. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. The American Journal of Sociology 92:1287–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. Some properties of structural equivalence measures derived from sociometric choice data. Social Networks 10:1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Allan, Matt Reed, und Phil Le Grice. 2007. Vocational training: Trust, talk and knowledge transfer in small businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 14:280–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casciaro, Tiziana, und Miguel Sousa Lobo. 2008. When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Administrative Science Quarterly 53(4): 655–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Andrew H., und Sumon C. Mazumdar. 1997. A dynamic model of firewalls and non-traditional banking. Journal of Banking & Finance 21:393–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cofré-Bravo, Gabriela, Laurens Klerkx, und Alejandra Engler. 2019. Combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital for farm innovation: How farmers configure different support networks. Journal of Rural Studies 69:53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley M., und Daniel A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35:128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S. 1988a. Free riders and zealots: The role of social networks. Sociological Theory 6:52–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988b. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94:95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colfer, Lyra J., und Carliss Y. Baldwin. 2016. The mirroring hypothesis: Theory, evidence, and exceptions. Industrial and Corporate Change 25:709–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, Rob, und Lloyd Baird. 2000. Technology is not enough: Improving performance by building organizational memory. Sloan Management Review 41(3): 69–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, Rob, Stephen P Borgatti, und Andrew Parker. 2002. Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review 44(2): 25–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166121.

  • Davenport, Thomas H., und Laurence Prusak. 2000. Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know, 2. Aufl. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Gerald F. 1991. Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly 36(4): 583–613. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droege, Scott B., und Jenny M. Hoobler. 2003. Employee turnover and tacit knowledge diffusion: A network perspective. Journal of Managerial Issues 15:50–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Peter F. 1993. Post-Capitalist Society. 1. Aufl. Reed International Books. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Khatib, Rwan, Kathy Fogel, und Tomas Jandik. 2015. CEO network centrality and merger performance. Journal of Financial Economics 116(2): 349–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Emily. 2013. Formalist and relationalist theory in social network analysis. Sociological Theory 31:219–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawad Sharif, Sayed Muhammad, Yang Naiding, Xu Yan, und Atiq Ur Rehman. 2020. The effect of contract completeness on knowledge leakages in collaborative construction projects: A moderated mediation study. Journal of Knowledge Management 24:2057–2078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayol, H. 1929. Allgemeine und industrielle Verwaltung. München: Oldenbourg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Felin, Teppo, und Todd R. Zenger. 2014. Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy 43:914–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitjar, Rune Dahl, Franz Huber, und Andrés Rodríguez-Pose. 2016. Not too close, not too far: Testing the goldilocks principle of ‚optimal‘ distance in innovation networks. Industry and Innovation 23(6): 465–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1184562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, Kayo, und Thomas W. Valente. 2012. Social network influences on adolescent substance use: Disentangling structural equivalence from cohesion. Social Science & Medicine 74:1952–1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganguly, Anirban, Asim Talukdar, und Debdeep Chatterjee. 2019. Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization. Journal of Knowledge Management 23:1105–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, Oliver, und Berislav Gaso. 2004. Insourcing creativity with listening posts in decentralized firms. Creativity and Innovation Management 13:3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glückler, Johannes. 2014. How controversial innovation succeeds in the periphery? A network perspective of BASF Argentina. Journal of Economic Geography 14:903–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glückler, Johannes, und Robert Panitz. 2014. Command or conviction? Informal networks and the diffusion of controversial innovations. In Learning organizations. Knowledge and space, Hrsg. Ariane Berthoin Antal, Peter Meusburger, und Laura Suarsana, Bd. 6, 49–67. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2021. Unleashing the potential of relational research: A meta-analysis of network studies in human geography. Progress in Human Geography 45:1531–1557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glückler, Johannes, Robert Panitz, und Ingmar Hammer. 2020. SONA: A relational methodology to identify structure in networks. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie (The German Journal of Economic Geography) 64:121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabher, Gernot. 2002. The project ecology of advertising: Tasks, talents and teams. Regional Studies 36:245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark. 1973. The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology 78:1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, Ranjay. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal 19:293–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, Ranjay, Nitin Nohria, und Akbar Zaheer. 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal 21:203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkola, Julia, und Arent Greve. 1995. Diffusion of technology: Cohesion or structural equivalence? Academy of Management Proceedings 1995:422–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo, César A. 2016. Disconnected, fragmented, or united? A trans-disciplinary review of network science. Applied Network Science 1:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holste, J. Scott, und Dail Fields. 2010. Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of Knowledge Management 14:128–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Hung-Chun, Hsin-Yu Shih, und Ya-Chi Wu. 2011. Contagion effects of national innovative capacity: Comparing structural equivalence and cohesion models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78(2): 244–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.07.017.

  • Ibarra, Herminia. 1993. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal 36:471–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, Mohammed, und Pieter M. Ribbers. 2009. The impacts of competence-trust and openness-trust on interorganizational systems. European Journal of Information Systems 18:223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, Adam B., und Manuel Trajtenberg. 1999. International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 8:105–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Jeffrey C. 1986. Social networks and innovation adoption: A look at burt’s use of structural equivalence. Social Networks 8:343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Ralph, und Thomas J. Allen. 1982. Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D Project Groups. R&D Management 12(1): 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum, Adam M. 2012. Organizational misfits and the origins of brokerage in intrafirm networks. Administrative Science Quarterly 57:407–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneeland, Madeline, und Adam M. Kleinbaum. 2022. Rewiring the organizational network: Corporate offsites stimulate network tie formation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3520640.

  • Kogut, Bruce, und Udo Zander. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 24:625–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, David. 1996. Social networks and liability of newness for managers. In Trends in organizational behavior, Hrsg. C. L. Cooper und D. M. Rousseau, Bd. 3, 159–173. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, David. 1997. Organization viscosity and the diffusion of controversial innovations. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 22(2): 177–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1997.9990200.

  • Krackhardt, David, und Jeffrey R. Hanson. 1993. Informal networks: The company behind the chart. Harvard Business Review 71:104–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroszner, Randall S., und Raghuram G. Rajan. 1997. Organization structure and credibility: Evidence from commercial bank securities activities before the Glass-Steagall Act. Journal of Monetary Economics 39:475–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazega, Emmanuel. 2009. Cooperation among competitors: Its social mechanisms through network analyses. Sociologica 1:1–34. https://doi.org/10.2383/29560

  • Lazega, Emmanuel, Claire Lemercier, und Lise Mounier. 2006. A spinning top model of formal organization and informal behavior: Dynamics of advice networks among judges in a commercial court. European Management Review 3:113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Daniel Z., und Rob Cross. 2004. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science 50:1477–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, Leyland M. 2006. The role of culture on knowledge transfer: The case of the multinational corporation. The Learning Organization 13:257–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, Bengt-Äke, und Björn Johnson. 1994. The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies 1:23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzini, Raffaella, Valentina Lazzarotti, und Luisa Pellegrini. 2017. How to remain as closed as possible in the open innovation era: The case of Lindt & Sprüngli. Long Range Planning 50:260–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschall, Alfred. 1920. Principles of economics, 8. Aufl. London: Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Jeffrey A., und Kathleen M. Eisenhardt. 2010. Rewiring: Cross-business-unit collaborations in multibusiness organizations. Academy of Management Journal 53:265–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, Peter. 2014. Accessing remote knowledge – The roles of trade fairs, pipelines, crowdsourcing and listening posts. Journal of Economic Geography 14:883–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazloomi Khamseh, Hamid, und Dominique R. Jolly. 2008. Knowledge transfer in alliances: Determinant factors. Journal of Knowledge Management 12:37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, C., und D. Krackhardt. 2003. Network conditions for organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 39:324–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, und James M. Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27:415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Aileen, und Thomas N. Garavan. 2009. The adoption and diffusion of an NHRD standard: A conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review 8(1): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484308330019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalebuff, Barry J., und Adam M. Brandenburger. 2002. Co-opetition: 1. A revolutionary mindset that combines competition and cooperation. 2. The game theory strategy that’s changing the game of business. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, Ikujiro. 1991. The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review 69:96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, Bart, Wim Van Haverbeke, Geert Duysters, Victor Gilsing, und Ad van den Oord. 2007. Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy 36:1016–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, David. 2005. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 50(1): 100–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith, Jason, und Walter W. Powell. 2004. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science 15:5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panitz, Robert, und Johannes Glückler. 2017. Rewiring global networks at local events: Congresses in the stock photo trade. Global Networks 17:147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. Network stability in organizational flux: The case of in-house management consulting. Social Networks 61:170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, Corey, Ralph Heidl, und Anu Wadhwa. 2012. Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management 38:1115–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probst, Gilbert, Steffen Raub, und Kai Romhardt. 2006. Wissen managen: Wie Unternehmen ihre wertvollste Ressource optimal nutzen, 5., überarb. Aufl. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M., und Dilip K. Bhowmik. 1970. Homophily-heterophily: Relational concepts for communication research. The Public Opinion Quarterly 34(4): 523–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/267838.

  • Schreyögg, Georg, und Daniel Geiger. 2016. Organisation: Grundlagen moderner Organisationsgestaltung. Mit Fallstudien. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Josef A. 1939. Business cycles. New York/Toronto/London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Bokyong. 2021. Exploring network measures of social capital: Toward more relational measurement. Journal of Planning Literature 36(3): 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412221999415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Jongtae, und David Jalajas. 2010. Technological relatedness, boundary-spanning combination of knowledge and the impact of innovation: Evidence of an inverted-U relationship. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 21(2): 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2010.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouthuysen, Kristof, Hendrik Slabbinck, und Filip Roodhooft. 2017. Formal controls and alliance performance: The effects of alliance motivation and informal controls. Management Accounting Research 37:49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Justin, Hongjuan Zhang, und Liang Wang. 2015. Network closure or structural hole? The conditioning effects of network – level social capital on innovation performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 39(5): 1189–1212. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, Wenpin. 2002. Social structure of „coopetition“ within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science 13:179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, Brian. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review 61:674–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42:35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, Brian, und Jarrett Spiro. 2005. Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology 111:447–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Chunlei, Simon Rodan, Mark Fruin, und Xu. **aoyan. 2014. Knowledge networks, collaboration networks, and exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal 57(2): 484–514. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Yihui, und Stefano Miraglia. 2017. Organizational culture and knowledge transfer in project-based organizations: Theoretical insights from a Chinese construction firm. International Journal of Project Management 35:571–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Harrison C. 2005. Markets from networks: Socioeconomic models of production. 2. print and 1. paperback print. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Christopher, und Brigitte Nones. 2009. R&D subsidiary isolation in knowledge-intensive industries: Evidence from Austria. R&D Management 39:111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Sze-Sze, und Wai Fong Boh. 2014. The contingent effects of social network sparseness and centrality on managerial innovativeness. Journal of Management Studies 51(7): 1180–1203. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zin, Lazim Mohd, Faridahwati Mohd Shamsudin, und Chandrakantan Subramaniam. 2013. Investigating the influence of job rotation on career development among production worker in Japanese Companies. The International Journal of Business and Society 14:135–148.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Management, Universität Koblenz, Koblenz, Deutschland

    Robert Panitz

Authors
  1. Robert Panitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Panitz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fachbereich Gesellschaftswissenschaften, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Deutschland

    Christian Stegbauer

  2. RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Deutschland

    Roger Häußling

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Panitz, R. (2024). Netzwerke in der Innovations- und Wissensmanagementpraxis. In: Stegbauer, C., Häußling, R. (eds) Handbuch Netzwerkforschung. Netzwerkforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37507-2_76-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37507-2_76-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-37507-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-37507-2

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Netzwerke in der Innovations- und Wissensmanagementpraxis
    Published:
    07 May 2024

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37507-2_76-2

  2. Original

    Netzwerke in der Innovations- und Wissensmanagementpraxis
    Published:
    01 March 2024

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37507-2_76-1

Search

Navigation