Unbeantwortete Fragen im Advocacy Coalition Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Politische Komplexität, Governance von Innovationen und Policy-Netzwerke

Zusammenfassung

Das Advocacy Coalition Framework, entwickelt von Sabatier und Jenkins-Smith (1993), basiert auf der Annahme, dass Akteure, involviert in die Gestaltung von öffentlichen Politiken, sich gemeinsam koordinieren, weil sie ähnlich denken oder an das gleiche glauben. Es gibt unzählige Anwendungen des ACF, welche diese Annahme bestätigen: ein Grund, warum sich Akteure koordinieren, miteinander in Interaktionen geraten, ist, weil sie die gleiche Weltanschauung haben, ein gesellschaftliches Problem ähnlich oder gleich lösen möchten (siehe zum Beispiel Fischer und Ingold 2014; Gronow et al. 2020).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Brazil)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (Brazil)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (Brazil)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Baumgartner, Frank R. und Bryan D. Jones. 2010. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berardo, Ramiro und John T. Scholz. 2010. Self-Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection, and Cooperation in Estuaries. American Journal of Political Science 54(3):632–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00451.x.

  • Borgatti, Stephen P., Martin G. Everett und Jeffrey C. Johnson. 2013. Analyzing Social Networks. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calanni, John C., Saba N. Siddiki, Christopher M. Weible und William D. Leach. 2015. Explaining Coordination in Collaborative Partnerships and Clarifying the Scope of the Belief Homophily Hypothesis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(3):901–927. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut080.

  • Fischer, Manuel und Philip Leifeld. 2015. Policy Forums: Why do they Exist and what are they Used for? Policy Sciences 48(3):363–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9224-y.

  • Fischer, Manuel und Pascal Sciarini. 2015. Unpacking Reputational Power: Intended and Unintended Determinants of the Assessment of Actors’ Power. Social Networks 42:60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.02.008.

  • Henry, Adam D. 2011. Power, Ideology, and the Structure of Policy Networks. Policy Studies Journal 39(3):361–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00413.x.

  • Herzog, Laura M. und Karin Ingold. 2020. Threat to Common-Pool Resources and the Importance of Forums: On the Emergence of Cooperation in CPR Problem Settings. Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12308 (im Erscheinen).

  • Ingold, Karin. 2011. Network Structures within Policy Processes: Coalitions, Power, and Brokerage in Swiss Climate Policy. Policy Studies Journal 39(3):435–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00416.x.

  • Ingold, Karin und Manuel Fischer. 2014. Drivers of Collaboration to Mitigate Climate Change: An Illustration of Swiss Climate Policy over 15 Years. Global Environmental Change 24:88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.021.

  • Ingold, Karin und Philip Leifeld. 2016. Structural and Institutional Determinants of Influence Reputation: A Comparison of Collaborative and Adversarial Policy Networks in Decision Making and Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu043.

  • Gronow, Antti, Paul Wagner und Tuomas Ylä-Anttila. 2020. Explaining Collaboration in Consensual and Conflictual Governance Networks. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12641 (im Erscheinen).

  • Kenis, Patrick N. und Volker Schneider. 1991. Policy Networks and Policy Analysis: Scrutinizing a New Analytical Toolbox. In Policy Networks. Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations, Hrsg. Bernd Marin und Renate Mayntz, 25–59. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, Christoph und Jale Tosun. 2012. Public Policy: A New Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, David (1994). Networks of Elite Structure and Decision Making. In Advances in Social Network Analysis. Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Hrsg. Stanley Wasserman und Joseph Galaskiewicz, 274–295. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifeld, Philip und Volker Schneider. 2012. Information Exchange in Policy Networks. American Journal of Political Science 56(3):731–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00580.x.

  • Lubell, Mark N. 2013. Governing Institutional Complexity: The Ecology of Games Framework. Policy Studies Journal 41(3):537–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12028.

  • Olivier, Tomás. 2019. How Do Institutions Address Collective-Action Problems? Bridging and Bonding in Institutional Design. Political Research Quarterly 72(1):162–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918784199.

  • Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, John F. und Christopher K. Ansell. 1993. Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology 98(6):1259–1319. https://doi.org/10.1086/230190.

  • Sabatier, Paul A. und Hank C. Jenkins-Smith. 1993. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Framework. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Volker. 1992. The Structure of Policy Networks: A Comparison of the Chemicals Control and Telecommunications Policy Domains in Germany. European Journal of Political Research 21(1–2):109–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00291.x.

  • Wasserman, Stanley und Katherine Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karin Ingold .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Der/die Herausgeber bzw. der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ingold, K. (2020). Unbeantwortete Fragen im Advocacy Coalition Framework. In: Nagel, M., Kenis, P., Leifeld, P., Schmedes, HJ. (eds) Politische Komplexität, Governance von Innovationen und Policy-Netzwerke. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30914-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30914-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-30913-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-30914-5

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation