SpringerLink
Log in

Die ethischen Grundlagen für die Entwicklung von Health Literacy in Schulen

Ethische Prämissen (warum), Orientierungen (was) und Artikulationen (wie)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Health Literacy im Kindes- und Jugendalter

Part of the book series: Gesundheit und Gesellschaft ((GESUND))

  • 7053 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Schulen gelten als entscheidende Lebenswelten für die Förderung von Health Literacy, allerdings erfolgt diese Festlegung ohne ausreichende Reflexion über ihre ethischen Grundlagen. Der vorliegende Beitrag geht von der Prämisse aus, dass Ethik grundlegend für alle Bildungsaspekte ist und folgt in der Entfaltung der Argumentation einem Eine-Welt-Ansatz, der Verallgemeinerungen für sowohl den sogenannten Globalen Norden wie den Globalen Süden anstrebt. Die Ausarbeitung untersucht zunächst, warum Health Literacy in Schulen gefördert werden sollte, und spricht sich dafür aus, dass die Zielsetzung einer Förderung die mit sozialer Gerechtigkeit einhergehenden Werte miteinbezieht und nicht bei individuellen und gesellschaftlichen Kosten-Nutzen-Analysen innehält. Die Argumentation richtet den Gegenstand Health Literacy anschließend nicht nur an praktischen Fertigkeiten sondern insbesondere an metakognitiven Fähigkeiten (kritisches Denken, Selbstaufmerksamkeit und Citizenship) aus. Schließlich werden Zugänge zur schulischen Förderung von Health Literacy mit einer ethischen Artikulation vorgestellt, welche die Aufmerksamkeit auf für gesundheitliche Ungleichheiten verantwortliche Machtverhältnisse richtet und nicht von der Annahme ausgeht, dass vorliegende Machtverhältnisse einen vorgegebenen Bezugsrahmen für Maßnahmen und Aktivitäten rund um Health Literacy darstellen.

Der vorliegende Beitrag basiert auf einem Aufsatz der Autorinnen, der 2018 in der Fachzeitschrift BMC Public Health veröffentlicht worden ist (Paakkari und George 2018). Bei der aktuellen Fassung auf Deutsch handelt es sich um eine übersetzte Version des ursprünglichen Beitrags. Übersetzung aus dem Englischen: Paulo Pinheiro und Marlene Pieper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 47.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 59.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Alexander, H. A. (2005). Education in ideology. Journal of Moral Education, 34(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Olson, L. S. (2007). Lasting consequences of the summer learning gap. American Sociological Review, 72(2), 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (2006). Educating the ‚right‘ way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts, K. (2010). Coming of age in a world of diversity? An assessment of the UN convention on the rights of the child. The Hague: International Institute of Social Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, S. (2011). Ethics in an age of austerity: Social work and the evolving new public management. Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice, 20(2), 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benade, L. (2008). Enterprise in the New Zealand curriculum and its challenge to ethical teacher professionality. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 332, 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2005). Where are the children? Children’s role in measuring and monitoring their well-being. Social Indicators Research, 74(3), 573–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A., & Frønes, I. (2011). Taxonomy for child well-being indicators: A framework for the analysis of the well-being of children. Childhood, 18(4), 460–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S. L., Donahue, K. E., Halpern, D. J., & Crotty, K. (2011). Low health literacy and health outcomes: An updated systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 155(2), 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Boulder: Paradigm Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2013). The beautiful risk of education. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzekowski, D. L. (2009). Considering children and health literacy: A theoretical approach. Pediatrics, 124(Suppl 3), 282–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, A. M. (1997). Behavior, disease, and health in the twentieth-century United States – The moral valance of individual states. In A. M. Brandt & P. Rozin (Hrsg.), Morality and health (S. 53–77). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, E. (2008). The ethics of teaching as a moral profession. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4), 357–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvel, L., & Leist, A. K. (2015). Socioeconomic hierarchy and health gradient in Europe: The role of income inequality and of social origins. International Journal for Equity in Health, 14(1), 132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, D. (2011). Critical health literacy: A review and critical analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 73(1), 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWalt, D. A., & Hink, A. (2009). Health literacy and child health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. Pediatrics, 124(Suppl. 3), 265–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, D. B., Von Hippel, P. T., & Broh, B. A. (2004). Are schools the great equalizer? Cognitive inequality during the summer months and the school year. American Sociological Review, 69(5), 613–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duru-Bellat, M. (2014). Social inequality at school and educational policies. Paris: UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. (2003). Physical education and health: A polemic or “let them eat cake”. European Physical Education Review, 9(1), 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. (2004). Social responsibility and ethics: Clarifying the concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(4), 381–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frønes, I. (2007). Theorizing indicators. Social Indicators Research, 83(1), 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazmararian, J. A., Curran, J. W., Parker, R. M., Bernhardt, J. M., & DeBuono, B. A. (2005). Public health literacy in America: An ethical imperative. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(3), 317–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Assembly United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. United Nations. Treaty Series, 1577, 3. http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38f0.html. Zugegriffen: 16. Feb. 2016.

  • George, S. (2009). Too young for respect? Realising respect for young children in their everyday environments. Working paper, 54. The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, S. (2013). Children as self-educators, parents as coaches; disciplined freedom and democratic spaces. Working Paper Series 2012–1013, D.N. Kothari Centre for Science, ethics and education. Delhi: University of Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, S. (2014). Re-imagined universities and global citizen professionals: International education, cosmopolitan pedagogies and global friendships. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin Journal, 134(3), 460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., & Tones, K. (2010). The determinants of health actions. Health promotion: Planning and strategies. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, N., & Ressler, W. H. (2001). On being responsible: Ethical issues in appeals to personal responsibility in health campaigns. Journal of Health Communication, 6(2), 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, C. (2008). Indoctrination and the space of reasons. Synthese, 56(3), 363–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haydon, G. (2006). Respect for persons and for cultures as a basis for national and global citizenship. Journal of Moral Education, 35(4), 457–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, F. (2002). The ethical school: Consequences, consistency and caring. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, B. (2012). Children, citizenship and environment: Nurturing a democratic imagination in a changing world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D. H., Gazmararian, J., & Parker, R. M. (2005). The impact of low health literacy on the medical costs of medicare managed care enrollees. The American Journal of Medicine, 118(4), 371–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingleby, D. (2012). Acquiring health literacy as a moral task. International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care, 8(1), 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannas, L. (2005). Terveystieto-oppiaineen pedagogisia lähtökohtia. In H. Peltonen & L. Kannas (Hrsg.), Terveystieto tutuksi – Ensiapua terveystiedon opettamiseen (S. 9–36). Helsinki: Opetushallitus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickbusch, I. (2001). Health literacy: Addressing the health and education divide. Health Promotion International, 16(3), 289–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickbusch, I. (2008). Health literacy: An essential skill for the twenty-first century. Health Education, 108(2), 101–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickbusch, I., Pelikan, J. M., Apfel, F., & Tsouros, A. D. (2013). Health literacy: The solid facts. Copenhagen: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, A. (2011). Early childhood development – Global action is overdue. The Lancet., 378(9799), 1277–1278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, A., & Townshend, T. (2006). Obesogenic environments: Exploring the built and food environments. Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, 126(6), 262–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, G. (2005). Can you hear me? The right of young children to participate in decisions affecting them. Working Paper, 36. The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeppke, R. (2008). The value of health and the power of prevention. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 1(2), 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massé, R., & Williams-Jones, B. (2012). Ethical dilemmas in health promotion practice. In I. Rootman, A. Pederson, S. Dupéré, & M. O’Neill (Hrsg.), Health promotion in Canada: Critical perspectives on practice (S. 241–253). Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1997). Cultivating humanity: A classical defence of reform in liberal education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2006). Education and democratic citizenship: Capabilities and quality education. Journal of Human Development, 7(3), 385–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutbeam, D. (1998). Health promotion glossary. Health Promotion International, 13, 349–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutbeam, D. (2000). Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International, 15(3), 259–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutbeam, D. (2008). The evolving concept of health literacy. Social Science and Medicine, 67(12), 2072–2078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2015a). Immigrant students at school: Easing the journey towards integration. OECD Reviews of Migrant Education. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264249509-en.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2015b). The definition and selection of key competencies. Executive summary. OECD Program Definition and selection of competencies. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf. Zugegriffen: 16. Feb. 2016.

  • Paakkari, L., & Paakkari, O. (2012). Health literacy as a learning outcome in schools. Health Education, 112(2), 133–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paakkari, L., & Välimaa, R. (2013). Ethical issues in the teaching and learning of health topics in schools: The conceptions of teacher trainees. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paakkari, L., & George, S. (2018). Ethical underpinnings for the development of health literacy in schools: Ethical premises (‘why’), orientations (‘what’) and tone (‘how’). BMC Public Health, 326, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. M., Ratzan, S. C., & Lurie, N. (2003). Health literacy: A policy challenge for advancing high-quality health care. Health Affairs, 22(4), 147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Räsänen, R. (2000). Ethics, teacher education and changing horizons. In V. Sunnari & R. Räsänen (Hrsg.), Ethical challenges for teacher education and teaching – Special focus on gender and multicultural issues (S. 168–178). Faculty of Education: University of Jyväskylä.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruger, J. P. (2006). Ethics and governance of global health inequalities. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(11), 998–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar, M., Lowenstein, K. L., & Brill, A. (2010). A journey toward humanization in education. In P. C. Murrell Jr., M. E. Diez, S. Feiman-Nemser, & D. L. Schussler (Hrsg.), Teaching as a moral practice: Defining, develo**, and assessing professional dispositions in teacher education (S. 27–52). Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, B. (Hrsg.). (1990). Breaking the boundaries: A one-world approach to planning education. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, A., & Parsons, J. (1991). Towards critical thinking as an ethic. Theory and Research in Social Education., 19(1), 45–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (2002). Why health equity? Health Economics, 11, 659–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, K., Van den Broucke, S., Fullam, J., Doyle, G., Pelikan, J., Slonska, Z., & Brand, H. (2012). Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • St Leger, L. (2001). Schools, health literacy and public health: Possibilities and challenges. Health Promotion International, 16(2), 197–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suoninen, A. (2014). Lasten mediabarometri 2013. 0–8 -vuotiaiden mediankäyttö ja sen muutokset vuodesta 2010. [Children’s media barometer 2013: Media uses of 0–8 years-old childen in media uses during the 2010s; English summary]. Helsinki: Nuorisotutkimusseura verkkojulkaisuja 75. www.nuorisotutkimusseura.fi/images/julkaisuja/lastenmediabarometri2013.pdf. Zugegriffen: 16. Feb. 2016.

  • Swinburn, B., Egger, G., & Raza, F. (1999). Dissecting obesogenic environments: The development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity. Preventive Medicine, 29(6), 563–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannahill, A. (2008). Beyond evidence–to ethics: A decision-making framework for health promotion, public health and health improvement. Health Promotion International, 23(4), 380–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Dam, G., & Volman, M. (2004). Critical thinking as a citizenship competence: Teaching strategies. Learning and Instruction, 14(4), 359–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2015). Education for all 2000–2015. Achievements and challenges. EFA Global monitoring report. UNESCO: Paris. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232565. Zugegriffen: 2. Oct. 2019.

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2011). UNESCO and education. Everyone has the right to education. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000212715. Zugegriffen: 16. Feb. 2016.

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2014). UNESCO education strategy 2014–2021. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000231288. Zugegriffen: 16. Feb. 2016.

  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2006). Implementing child rights in early childhood. A guide to general comment (Bd. 7). The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation. https://www.unicef.org/earlychildhood/files/Guide_to_GC7.pdf. Zugegriffen: 16. Feb. 2016.

  • Wagner, T. (2008). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don’t teach the new survival skills our children need – And what we can do about it. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2013). Health 2020. A European policy framework and strategy for the 21st century. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/199532/Health2020-Long.pdf?ua=1. Zugegriffen: 16. Feb. 2016.

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2014). Review of social determinants and the health divide in the WHO European region. Final Report. Copenhagen. WHO Regional Office For Europe. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/251878/Review-of-social-determinants-and-the-health-divide-in-the-WHO-European-Region-FINAL-REPORT.pdf. Zugegriffen: 16. Feb. 2016.

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2015). Global health ethics. Key issues. Geneva: WHO. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/164576/9789240694033_eng.pdf;jsessionid=1E5DF0ACBACA156F23C1BA0FF38815D3?sequence=1. Zugegriffen: 16. Feb. 2016.

  • World Vision International. (2013). The killer gap: A global index of health in equality for children. http://www.wvi.org/sites/default/files/The%20Killer%20Gap%20report%20FINAL.pdf. Zugegriffen: 16. Feb. 2016.

  • Young, I. M. (2006). De-centering deliberative democracy. Kettering Review, 24(3), 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finnland

    Leena Paakkari

  2. WISHES Network, Amsterdam, Niederlande

    Shanti George

Authors
  1. Leena Paakkari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shanti George
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leena Paakkari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Bielefeld, Fakultät für Erziehungswissenschaft, Bielefeld, Germany

    Torsten M. Bollweg

  2. Universität Bielefeld, Fakultät für Erziehungswissenschaft, Bielefeld, Germany

    Janine Bröder

  3. Universität Bielefeld, Fakultät für Erziehungswissenschaft, Bielefeld, Germany

    Paulo Pinheiro

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Paakkari, L., George, S. (2020). Die ethischen Grundlagen für die Entwicklung von Health Literacy in Schulen. In: Bollweg, T., Bröder, J., Pinheiro, P. (eds) Health Literacy im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Gesundheit und Gesellschaft. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29816-6_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29816-6_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-29815-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-29816-6

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation