A Practical View of Numerical Taxonomy or should I be a Pheneticist or a Cladist?

  • Chapter
Numerical Taxonomy

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASIG,volume 1))

  • 386 Accesses

Abstract

I wish to approach this subject from the point of view of a practicing taxonomist wishing to take advantage of numerical taxonomic methodologies for the purpose of solving taxonomic problems or for the purpose of constructing classifications. I regard these as separate operations because, in my view of taxonomy, one cannot construct a classification until one is (reasonably) sure of what it is one wishes to classify. That is, it is first necessary to detect entities that may then be subjected to classificatory methods. Therefore, the process of classification is preceded by a process of detection. We may view the combination of these activities as a three stage process: (1) recognition of differences between individuals, (2) grou** those individuals having common characteristics, (3) assessing the relationships between the groups so recognized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 85.59
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beatty, J. 1982. Classes and cladists. Syst. Zool. 31: 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, J. 1974. Phylogenetic models and classification. Syst. Zool. 23: 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowson, R. A. 1970. Classification and biology. Heinemann Educational Books. London. 350 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J. S. 1974. Formal definitions of paraphyly and polyphyly. Syst. Zool. 23: 548–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J. S. 1977. On the phenetic approach to vertebrate classifica-tion. In Hecht, M. K., B. M. Hecht, and P. C. Goody (eds.) Major patterns in vertebrate evolution. Plenum Press, New York and London, pp. 823–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk, V. A., and D. R. Brooks (eds.). 1981. Advances in cladistics. The New York Botanical Garden. Bronx, New York. 250 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. 1964. Consistency and monophyly. Syst. Zool. 13: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. 1979. The limits of cladism. Syst. Zool. 28: 416–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. J., and C. D. Barbour. 1981. A phylogenetic reconstruction of the Mexican cyprinid fish genus Algansea. Syst. Zool. 30: 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knops, J. F., and R. J. Jensen. 1980. Morphological and phenolic variation in a three species community of red oaks. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 107: 418–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, G. H. M. 1951. Taxonomy of vascular plants. MacMillan. New York. 833 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, J. 1979. Purposeful phenetics. Syst. Zool. 28: 465–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickevich, M. F., and C. Mitter. 1981. Treating polymorphic characters in systematics: a phylogenetic treatment of electrophoretic data. In Funk, V. A. and D. R. Brooks (eds.), Advances in cladistics. The New York Botanical Garden. Bronx, New York, pp. 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G. J. 1971. Paraphyly and polyphyly: redefinitions. Syst. Zool. 20: 471–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G. and N. Platnick. 1981. Systematics and biogeography: Cladistics and vicariance. Columbia Univ. Press. New York. 567 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, J. B. 1971. Dendrogram topology. Syst. Zool. 20:306–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platnick, N. I. 1979. Philosophy and the transformation of cladistics. Syst. Zool. 28: 537–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. 1972. Objective knowledge. Oxford Univ. Press. London. 380 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A. E., W. C. Dickison, J. R. Massey, and C. R. Bell. 1974. Vascular plant systematics. Harper and Row. New York. 891 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Spatial representation of phylogenetic trees computed from dissimilarity matrices. Inter. Symp. Concpt., Meth. Paleo Barcelona: 303–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F. J., and R. R. Sokal. 1981. Comparing numerical taxonomic studies. Syst. Zool. 30: 459–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuh, R. T. and J. S. Farris. 1981. Methods for investigating taxonomic congruence and their application to the Leptopodomorpha Syst. Zool. 30: 331–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A., and R. R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman. San Francisco. 573 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. 1974. Mayr on cladism - and his critics. Syst. Zool. 24: 257–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, P. F. 1980. Evolutionary polarity of character states. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 333–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swingle, D. B. 1934. A textbook of systematic botany. McGraw-Hill. New York. 270 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L. 1981. On the utility of the distance Wagner procedure.In Funk, V. A. and D. R. Brooks (eds.), Advances in cladistics. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York. pp. 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watrous, L. E. and Q. D. Wheeler. 1981. The out-group comparison

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O. 1975. Karl R. Popper, Systematics, and classification: a reply to Walter Bock and other evolutionary taxonomists. Syst. Zool. 24: 233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O. 1981. Convex groups and consistent classifications. Syst. Bot. 6: 346–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jensen, R.J. (1983). A Practical View of Numerical Taxonomy or should I be a Pheneticist or a Cladist?. In: Felsenstein, J. (eds) Numerical Taxonomy. NATO ASI Series, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69024-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69024-2_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-69026-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69024-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation