Abstract
Methods of reconstructing phylogeny generally cannot be validated by comparison with the true phylogeny. This is an obvious hindrance in debates concerning the relative merits of various taxonomic approaches. In order to be able to compare estimated trees with “true” phylogenies, I have developed a simulation model that generates artificial data sets with properties expected of real data sets, and having a known phylogeny.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Astolfi, P., K. K. Kidd, and L. L. Cavalli-Sforza. 1981. A comparison of methods for reconstructing evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 30: 156–169.
Colless, D. H. 1980. Congruence between morphometric and allozyme data for Menidia species: A reappraisal. Syst. Zool. 29: 288–299.
Kluge, A. G., and J. S. Farris. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18: 1–32.
Raup, D. M. and S. J. Gould. 1974. Stochastic simulation and evolution of morphology-towards a nomothetic paleontology. Syst. Zool. 23: 305–322.
Raup, D. M., S. J. Gould, T. J. M. Schopf, and D. S. Simberloff. 1973. Stochastic models of phylogeny and the evolution of diversity. J. Geol. 81: 525–542.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fiala, K.L. (1983). A Simulation Model for Comparing Numerical Taxonomic Methods. In: Felsenstein, J. (eds) Numerical Taxonomy. NATO ASI Series, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69024-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69024-2_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-69026-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69024-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive