Representing clustered microcalcifications by their cluster shape

  • Conference paper
Digital Mammography

Abstract

The shape and arrangement of clustered microcalcifications help the radiologists to judge the likelihood of cancer being present. In general, malignant calcifications are very numerous, clustered, small, dot-like or elongated, and variable in size, shape, and density. In contrast, benign calcifications are generally larger, less numerous, more rounded, more diffusely distributed, and more homogeneous in size and shape. Starting from a segmentation algorithm that individually identifies the microcalcifications, we have used a bottom-up hierarchical algorithm to group them into clusters for a later characterization. This behavior leads to meaningfully differentiated shapes for both kinds of clusters. A Case-Based Reasoning classifier has been applied to classify the data and validate the cluster composition with promising results (at a false positive fraction of 10%, an 86% true positive fraction has been attained).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martí J, Cufi X, Regincós J, et al. Shaped-base features selection for microcalcification evaluation. In Kenneth M. Hanson ed., Medical Imaging 1998, SPIE vol. 3338, pages 1215–1224. February 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Woods K, Automated Image Analysis Techniques for Digital Mammography Ph.D. Dissertation, December 1994. University of South Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shen L, Rangayyan RM, Leo Desautels JE. Detection and Classification of mammographic Calcifications, World Scientific, State of the Art in Digital mammographic Image Analysis, volume 9, pages 198–212, June 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D. Snake: Active Contour Models, International Journal of Computer Vision, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1 (4): 321–331, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shen L, Rangayyan RM, Leo Desautels JE. Application of Shape Analysis to mammographic Calcifications. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 13, no 2 pages 263–274, June 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marti J, Español J, Golobardes E, et al. Classification of Microcalcifications in Digital Mammograms using Case-Based Reasoning. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pages 285–294. Toronto, Canada, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Planiol, P., Martí, J., Español, J., Golobardes, E., Gay, J., Freixenet, J. (2003). Representing clustered microcalcifications by their cluster shape. In: Peitgen, HO. (eds) Digital Mammography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59327-7_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59327-7_57

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63936-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59327-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation