Abstract
This paper considers the use of statistical profiling to allocate persons to alternative options within government programs, or to participation or non-participation in programs Profiling has been used in the United States to allocate unemployment insurance (UI) claimants to reemployment services based on the predicted duration of their UI claim. We place profiling in the context of the choice among alternative assignment mechanisms. Different mechanisms have different costs and benefits — any one mechanism, whether profiling or something else, may not be optimal for every program. Within profiling systems, we highlight the need for clarity regarding the objective of the assignment mechanism, e.g. equity or efficiency, and we discuss situations in which equity and efficiency goals may conflict. In relation to UI profiling in the United States, we provide empirical evidence from the state of Kentucky on two important questions. First, we demonstrate that it is possible to effectively predict the duration of UI spells, but that effectively doing so requires using more covariates than many US states presently do. This finding is important because effective prediction of the profiling variable is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the success of a profiling system. Second, we show that the impact of reemployment services does not appear to vary with expected duration of the UI spell, indicating that UI profiling in Kentucky does not advance the goal of efficiency, though it may advance equity goals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berger, M., Black, D., Chandra, A., Allen, S. (1997): Kentucky’s Statistical Model of Worker Profiling for Unemployment Insurance. Kentucky Journal of Economics and Business 16, 1–18.
Black, D., Smith, J., Berger, M., Noel, B. (2000): Is the Threat of Reemployment Servies More Effective than the Services Themselves? Experimental Evidence from the UI System. Unpublished manuscript, University of Western Ontario.
Bloom, H., On, L., Cave, G., Bell, S., Doolittle, F. (1993): The National JTPA Study: Title II-A Impacts on Earnings and Employment at 18 Months. Bethesda, MD, Abt Associates.
Dehejia, R. (1999): Program Evaluation as a Decision Problem. NBER Working Paper #6954.
Dickinson, K., Decker, P. Kreutzer, S. (1999): Evaluation of Worker Profiling and Reemployment Services Systems. Unpublished manuscript.
Eberts, R., O’Leary, C. (1996): Design of the Worker Profiling and Reemployment Services System and Evaluation in Michigan. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research Working Paper #96–41, Kalamazoo, MI, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
Heckman, J., Heinrich, C., Smith, J. (1997): Assessing the Performance of Performance Standards in Public Bureaucracies. American Economic Review 87(2), 389–395.
Heckman, J., Smith, J., Taber, C. (1996): What Do Bureaucrats Do? The Effects of Performance Standards and Bureaucratic Preferences on Acceptance into the JTPA Program. In: Libecap, G. (Ed.): Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth: Reinventing Government and the Problem of Bureaucracy, Volume 7, Greenwich, 191–217.
Machin, S., Manning, A. (1999): The Causes and Consequences of Longterm Unemployment in Europe. In: Ashenfelter, O., Card, D. (Eds.): Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume 3C. Amsterdam, 3085–3139.
Manski, C. (1999). Statistical Treatment Rules for Heterogeneous Populations With Application to Randomized Experiments. Unpublished manuscript, Chicago, IL, Northwestern University.
Manski, C. (2000): Identification Problems and Decisions Under Ambiguity. Empirical Analysis of Treatment Response and Normative Analysis of Treatment Choice. Journal of Econometrics 95(2), 415–442.
Noel, B. (1998): Two Essays on Unemployment Insurance. Unpublished dissertation, University of Kentucky.
O’Leary, C., Decker, P., Wandner, S. (1998): Reemployment Bonuses and Profiling. W.E. Upjohn Working Paper #98–51, Kalamazoo, MI, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1998): Early Identification of Job Seekers at Risk of Long-Term Unemployment: The Role of Profiling. Paris.
Payne, J., Casey, B., Payne, C., Connolly, S. (1996): Long-term Unemployment: Individual Risk Factors and Outcomes. London.
Storey, J., Neisner, J. (1997): Unemployment Compensation in the Group of Seven Nations. In: O’Leary, C., Wandner, S. (Eds.): Unemployment Insurance in the United States. Kalamazoo, MI, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 599–668.
Wong, G., Henson, H., Roy, A. (1999): Long-Term Unemployment in Canada: Outlook and Policy Options. Ottawa.
Worden, K. (1993): Profiling Dislocated Workers for Early Referral to Reemployment Services. Unpublished manuscript, Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Labor.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Berger, M.C., Black, D., Smith, J.A. (2001). Evaluating profiling as a means of allocating government services. In: Lechner, M., Pfeiffer, F. (eds) Econometric Evaluation of Labour Market Policies. ZEW Economic Studies, vol 13. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57615-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57615-7_4
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1372-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57615-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive