Glaucoma Diagnosis by Indirect Classifiers

  • Conference paper
Classification, Clustering, and Data Analysis

Abstract

Medical decision making is based on various diagnostic measurements and the evaluation of anamnestic information. For example glaucoma diagnosis is based on several direct and indirect assessments of the eye. We discuss possibilities to use a definition of glaucoma to improve supervised glaucoma classification by laser scanning image data. The learning sample consists of laser scanning image data and other diagnostic measurements.

We discuss indirect supervised classification proposed by Hand et al. (2001), which provides a framework to incorporate the full information of the learning sample as intermediate variables. We compare direct classifiers like linear discriminant analysis, classification trees and bagged classification trees with indirect classification. Comparing bagged direct and bagged indirect classifiers, we achieve a reduction of estimated misclassification error from 18.3% to 15.4%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Coleman, A. L. (1999): Glaucoma, The Lancet, Vol.354, 1803–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L. (1996): Bagging predictors, Machine Learning, Vol. 24, 2, 123–140.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L. (1998): Arcing classifiers, The Annals of Statistics, Vol. 26, 3, 801 49.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Torgo, L. and Da Costa, J. P. (2000): Clustered multiple regression, in Kiers, H., Rasson, J.-P., Groenen, P., and Schader, M. (Eds.): Data Analysis, Classification, and Related Methods, Springer, Heidelberg, 217–222.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. H. (1997): On bias, variance, 0/1-loss, and the curseofdimensionality, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Vol. 1, 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. L., Bathija, R., and Weinreb, R. N. (1998): The definition of normaltension glaucoma., Journal of Glaucoma, Vol. 7, 6, 366–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. and Wermuth, N. (1996): Multivariate Dependencies. Models, analysis and interpretation, Chapman Hall, London, UK.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. (1997): Improvements on cross-validation: The.632+ bootstrap method, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 92, 438, 548–560.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hand, D., Li, H., and Adams, N. (2001): Supervised classification with structured class definitions, Computational Statistics el Data Analysis, Vol. 36, 209–225.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Swindale, N. V., Stjepanovic, G., Chin, A., and Mikelberg, F. S. (2000): Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images., Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Vol. 41, 7, 1730–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardin, C. Y., Horn, F. K., Jonas, J. B., and Budde, W. M. (1999): Preperimetric glaucoma diagnosis by confocal scanning laser tomography of the optic disc., British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 83, 3, 299–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidelberg Engineering (1997): Heidelberg Retina Tomograph: Bedienungsanleitung Software version 2.01., Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lausen, B., Sauerbrei, W., and Schumacher, M. (1994): Classification and regression trees (CART) used for the exploration of prognostic factors measured on different scales, in Dirschedl, P. and Ostermann, R. (Eds.): Computational Statistics, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 483–496.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ciampi, A. and Lechevallier, Y. (2000): Constructing artificial neural networks for censored survival data from statistical models, in Kiers, H., Rasson, J.-P., Groenen, P., and Schader, M. (Eds.): Data Analysis, Classification, and Related Methods, Springer, Heidelberg, 223–228.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Peters, A., Hothorn, T., Lausen, B. (2002). Glaucoma Diagnosis by Indirect Classifiers. In: Jajuga, K., Sokołowski, A., Bock, HH. (eds) Classification, Clustering, and Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56181-8_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56181-8_51

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43691-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56181-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation