Zusammenfassung
Führung in der Wissenschaft ist herausfordernd und komplex. Gleichzeitig ist effektive Führung ein zentraler Erfolgsfaktor für Forschungsteams. Ethikorientierte Führung kann die Motivation und Leistung von Mitarbeiter*innen steigern, destruktives Führungsverhalten dagegen wirkt sich in der Regel negativ aus. Dieses Kapitel gibt einen Überblick über die Forschung zu ethikorientierter und destruktiver Führung in der Wissenschaft und praktische, evidenzbasierte Handlungsempfehlungen zur Förderung von Führungskompetenzen in Einrichtungen der Forschung und Lehre.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
- 1.
Die Tools sind teilweise aus früheren Materialien für Führungstrainings entnommen bzw. wurden auf dieser Grundlage weiterentwickelt. Zu früheren Versionen oder der endgültigen Fassung haben maßgeblich beigetragen: Dieter Frey, Claudia Peus, Susanne Braun, Silke Weisweiler, Kristin Knipfer, Ellen Schmid, Armin Pircher Verdorfer, Stephanie Rehbock, Regina Dutz, Sarah Baedorf und Katharina Schönecker.
Literatur
Aasland, M. S., Skogstad, A., Notelaers, G., Nielsen, M. B., & Einarsen, S. (2010). The prevalence of destructive leadership behaviour. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 438–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00672.x
Almeida, J. G., Hartog, D. N. D., De Hoogh, A. H., Franco, V. R., & Porto, J. B. (2022). Harmful leader behaviors: Toward an increased understanding of how different forms of unethical leader behavior can harm subordinates. Journal of Business Ethics, 180, 215–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04864-7
Anseel, F., Lievens, F., & Schollaert, E. (2009). Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.003
Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398410
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Develo** transformational leadership: 1992 and beyond. Journal of European Industrial Training, 14(5), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090599010135122
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
Braun, S., & Peus, C. (2014). Wertschöpfung durch Werte? Vom Nutzen ethikorientierter Führung. PERSONALquarterly, 1, 28–33.
Braun, S., & Peus, C. (2017). Leading in Science: Mit Führung und Vertrauen die Wissenschaft voranbringen. Personal in Hochschule und Wissenschaft entwickeln, 1, 111–117.
Braun, S., Peus, C., Weisweiler, S., & Frey, D. (2013). Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevel mediation model of trust. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.006
Braun, S., Peus, C., Frey, D., & Knipfer, K. (2016). Leadership in academia: Individual and collective approaches to the quest for creativity and innovation. In C. Peus, S. Braun, & B. Schyns (Hrsg.), Leadership lessons from compelling contexts (Bd. 8, S. 349–365). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-357120160000008013
Brescoll, V. L., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2008). Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace. Psychological Science, 19(3), 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02079.x
Brown, F. W., & Moshavi, D. (2002). Herding academic cats: Faculty reactions to transformational and contingent reward leadership by department chairs. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(3), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200800307
Bryman, A. (2007). Effective leadership in higher education: A literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 693–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701685114
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. E. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(2), 164–209. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1791
Dumulescu, D., & Muţiu, A. I. (2021). Academic leadership in the time of COVID-19 – Experiences and perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 648344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648344
Dutz, R., Pircher Verdorfer, A., Rehbock, S., & Peus, C. (2022). Destructive leadership in academia: Gender biases in evaluations of leader behaviors and attributed motives 52. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie, Hildesheim.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569
Einarsen, S., Aasland, M. S., & Skogstad, A. (2007). Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.002
Evans, L. (2018). Professors as academic leaders: Expectations, enacted professionalism and evolving roles. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Fernandez, A. A., & Shaw, G. P. (2020). Academic leadership in a time of crisis: The Coronavirus and COVID-19. Journal of Leadership Studies, 14(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21684
Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Hrsg.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (S. 79–103). Erlbaum.
Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
Heilman, M. E., & Chen, J. J. (2005). Same behavior, different consequences: Reactions to men’s and women’s altruistic citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.431
Hentschel, T., Braun, S., Peus, C., & Frey, D. (2018). The communality-bonus effect for male transformational leaders – leadership style, gender, and promotability. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(1), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1402759
Hentschel, T., Heilman, M. E., & Peus, C. (2019). The multiple dimensions of gender stereotypes: A current look at men’s and women’s characterizations of others and themselves. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00011
Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2), 501–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316665461
Keashly, L. (2021). Workplace bullying, mobbing and harassment in academe: Faculty experience. In P. D’Cruz, E. Noronha, L. Keashly, & S. Tye-Williams (Hrsg.), Special topics and particular occupations, professions and sectors. Handbooks of workplace bullying, emotional abuse and harrassment (Bd. 4, S. 221–297). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5308-5_13
Keller, R. T. (2006). Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.202
Kim, J. K., Harold, C. M., & Holtz, B. C. (2022). Evaluations of abusive supervisors: The moderating role of the abuser’s gender. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(3), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2581
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
Knipfer, K., Kump, B., Wessel, D., & Cress, U. (2013). Reflection as a catalyst for organisational learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2012.683780
Knipfer, K., Scholl, A., & Kump, B. (2014). Lernen durch Reflexion: Lösungsansätze für die Zukunft. Wirtschaftspsychologie aktuell. Zeitschrift für Personal und Management, 3, 19–23.
Knipfer, K., Shaughnessy, B., Hentschel, T., & Schmid, E. (2017). Unlocking women’s leadership potential: A curricular example for develo** female leaders in academia. Journal of Management Education, 41(2), 272–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562916673863
Knipfer, K., Dutz, R., & Peus, C. (2022a). Verantwortungsvoll Führen: Destruktive Führung in der Wissenschaft und Ansätze zur Förderung von Führungskompetenzen. Personal- und Organisationsentwicklung in Einrichtungen der Lehre und Forschung, 1+2, 39–42.
Knipfer, K., Rehbock, S., & Hubner-Benz, S. (2022b). Wie sehen sich Professor*innen in ihrer Führungsrolle: Ausprägungen der Führungsidentität und Ansatzpunkte für eine gezielte Führungskräfteentwicklung in der Wissenschaft. Personal in Hochschule und Wissenschaft entwickeln, 5, 79–91.
Krasikova, D. V., Green, S. G., & LeBreton, J. M. (2013). Destructive leadership: A theoretical review, integration, and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1308–1338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471388
Macfarlane, B. (2011). Professors as intellectual leaders: Formation, identity and role. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903443734
Mackey, J. D., Ellen, B. P., III, McAllister, C. P., & Alexander, K. C. (2021). The dark side of leadership: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of destructive leadership research. Journal of Business Research, 132, 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.037
Moss, S., & Mahmoudi, M. (2021). STEM the bullying: An empirical investigation of abusive supervision in academic science. EClinicalMedicine, 40, 101121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101121
Peus, C., & Frey, D. (2009). Humanism at work: Crucial organizational cultures and leadership principles. In H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan, & E. Kimakowitz (Hrsg.), Humanism in business (S. 260–277). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808395.017
Peus, C., & Pircher Verdorfer, A. (2013). Ethics + business: Ingredients for great leadership. The European Business Review, 1/2.
Peus, C., Kerschreiter, R., Frey, D., & Traut-Mattausch, E. (2010). What is the value? Economic effects of ethically-oriented leadership. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/ Journal of Psychology, 218(4), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409/a000030
Peus, C., Braun, S., Hentschel, T., & Frey, D. (Hrsg.). (2015a). Personalauswahl in der Wissenschaft: Evidenzbasierte Methoden und Impulse für die Praxis. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48112-7
Peus, C., Welpe, I., Weisweiler, S., & Frey, D. (2015b). Führung an Hochschulen. In J. Felfe (Hrsg.), Trends der psychologischen Führungsforschung (S. 527–539). Hogrefe.
Peus, C., Knipfer, K., & Schmid, E. (2016). Erfolgsfaktor effektive Mitarbeiterführung. Wissenschaftsmanagement, 1, 20–23.
Pircher Verdorfer, A., Weber, W. G., Unterrainer, C., & Seyr, S. (2013). The relationship between organizational democracy and socio-moral climate: Exploring effects of the ethical context in organizations. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 34(3), 423–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X12450054
Raelin, J. A. (1995). How to manage your local professor. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Best Paper Proceedings, 207–211.
Rehbock, S. K. (2020). Academic leadership: Challenges and opportunities for leaders and leadership development in higher education. In M. Antoniadou & M. Crowder (Hrsg.), Modern day challenges in academia (S. 252–264). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788119191.00025
Rehbock, S. K., Baedorf, S., Schönecker, K., Pircher Verdorfer, A., Knipfer, K., & Peus, C. (2021a). Schlecht geführt? Wahrnehmung geschlechtsspezifischer Unterschiede destruktiver Führung. 12. Tagung der Fachgruppen Arbeits-, Organisations- und Wirtschaftspsychologie sowie Ingenieurspsychologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie, Chemnitz.
Rehbock, S. K., Knipfer, K., & Peus, C. (2021b). What got you here, won’t help you there: Changing requirements in the pre- versus the post-tenure career stage in academia. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 569281. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.569281
Rehbock, S. K., Pircher Verdorfer, A., & Knipfer, K. (2021c). Rate my professor: Implicit leadership theories in academia. Studies in Higher Education, 46(8), 1590–1602. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1696765
Rehbock, S. K., Hubner, S. V., Knipfer, K., & Peus, C. V. (2023). What kind of leader am I? An exploration of professionals’ leader identity construal. Applied Psychology, Advance Psychology, 72(2), 559–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12389
Sadeghi, A., & Pihie, Z. A. L. (2012). Transformational leadership and its predictive effects on leadership effectiveness. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(7), 186–197.
Schmid, E., & Pircher Verdorfer, A. (2020). Gerechtes Führen: Wie sich ethisches und destruktives Führungsverhalten auf die Mitarbeitenden auswirkt. In B. Badura, A. Ducki, H. Schröder, J. Klose, & M. Meyer (Hrsg.), Fehlzeiten-Report 2020 (S. 165–175). Springer.
Schmid, E., Knipfer, K., & Peus, C. (2015). Wissen alleine reicht nicht. Förderung von Selbst(lern)kompetenzen in der Führungskräfteentwicklung: Executive-MBA-Ausbildung an der TUM School of Management. Personalführung, 1, 50–57.
Schmid, E. A., Pircher Verdorfer, A., & Peus, C. (2018). Different shades – different effects? Consequences of different types of destructive leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1289. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01289
Schmid, E. A., Pircher Verdorfer, A., & Peus, C. (2019). Shedding light on leaders’ self-interest: Theory and measurement of exploitative leadership. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1401–1433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317707810
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 138–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.001
Skogstad, A., Einarsen, S., Torsheim, T., Aasland, M. S., & Hetland, H. (2007). The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.80
Sparr, J. L., Knipfer, K., & Willems, F. (2017). How leaders can get the most out of formal training: The significance of feedback-seeking and reflection as informal learning behaviors. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 28(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21263
Specht, A., & Crowston, K. (2022). Interdisciplinary collaboration from diverse science teams can produce significant outcomes. PloS One, 17(11), e0278043. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278043
Stempel, C. R., Rigotti, T., & Mohr, G. (2015). Think transformational leadership – think female? Leadership, 11(3), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715015590468
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375
Verbree, M., Van der Weijden, I., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2012). Academic leadership of high-performing research groups. In S. Hemlin, C. M. Allwood, B. Martin, & M. D. Mumford (Hrsg.), Creativity and leadership in science, technology, and innovation (S. 113–149). Routledge.
Wang, G., Oh, I.-S., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. (2011). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & Organization Management, 36(2), 223–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111401017
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Dutz, R., Knipfer, K., Peus, C. (2023). Führung in der Wissenschaft. In: Felfe, J., van Dick, R. (eds) Handbuch Mitarbeiterführung. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55213-7_69-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55213-7_69-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55213-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55213-7
eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Psychologie