SpringerLink
Log in

A Taxonomy of Business Process Management Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook on Business Process Management 2

Part of the book series: International Handbooks on Information Systems ((INFOSYS))

  • 7268 Accesses

Abstract

Both the design and the implementation of the Business Process Management (BPM) concept vary significantly from one organization to another. Organization-specific approaches to BPM are, among other things, influenced by organizational culture as well as by the maturity of the concept’s adoption in the respective organization. This chapter reports on findings from an empirical study and is aimed at answering the question of precisely how organizations deal with the process-oriented management concept – today and in the near future. To address this issue, 38 medium-sized and large organizations from various industries were surveyed. Out of 18 variables used to characterize individual BPM approaches, four distinct design factors of BPM are identified: the degree of process performance measurement, the overall professionalism of process management, the impact of process managers, and the utilization of established methodology and standards. Based on these design factors, four generic approaches to BPM can be differentiated. Furthermore, these results are complemented by an interpolation of this classification into the near future, leading to the differentiation of five BPM project types. This part of the analysis shows that all surveyed organizations strive to increase BPM maturity. There are however significant differences with respect to the particular design of the aspired approaches to mature BPM. The presented results are particularly useful for the engineering and/or adaptation of situational methods in the field of BPM. The chapter therefore concludes with the exemplary adaptation of the ‘process innovation’ method proposed by Davenport with respect to the identified five BPM project types. This adaptation also demonstrates the practical applicability of the presented findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 159.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 199.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
GBP 199.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ågerfalk PJ, Brinkkemper S, Gonzalez-Perez C, Henderson-Sellers B, Karlsson F, Kelly S, Ralyté J (2007) Modularization constructs in method engineering – towards common ground? In: Ralyté J, Brinkkemper S, Henderson-Sellers B (eds) Situational method engineering – fundamentals and experiences (Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.1 working conference, 12–14 September 2007, Geneva, Switzerland). Springer (International Federation for Information Processing, vol 244), Boston, pp 359–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter S (2003) 18 reasons why IT-reliant work systems should replace “the IT artifact” as the core subject matter of the IS field. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 12:366–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter S (2006) Work systems and IT artifacts – does the definition matter? Commun Assoc Inf Syst 17:299–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Armistead C, Machin S (1997) Implications of business process management for operations management. Int J Oper Prod Manag 17:886–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armistead C, Pritchard J-P, Machin S (1999) Strategic business process management for organizational effectiveness. Long Range Plann 32:96–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balzarova MA, Bamber CJ, McCambridge S, Sharp JM (2004) Key success factors in implementation of process-based management – a UK housing association experience. Bus Process Manag J 10:387–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker J, Janiesch C, Pfeiffer D (2007a) Reuse mechanisms in situational method engineering. In: Ralyté J, Brinkkemper S, Henderson-Sellers B (eds) Situational method engineering – fundamentals and experiences (Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference, 12–14 September 2007, Geneva, Switzerland). Springer (International federation for information processing, vol 244), Boston, pp 79–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker J, Knackstedt R, Pfeiffer D, Janiesch C (2007b) Configurative method engineering – on the applicability of reference modeling mechanisms in method engineering, proceedings of the 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2007) (13th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2007), Keystone, Colorado, USA, 2007), pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkkemper S (1996) Method engineering – engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Inf Softw Technol 38:275–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucher T (2009) Ausrichtung der Informationslogistik auf operative Prozesse – Entwicklung und Evaluation einer situativen Methode (in German language). Ph.D. thesis, Universität St. Gallen, Verlag Dr. Kovac, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher T, Klesse M (2006) Contextual method engineering. Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen (Working Paper), St. Gallen

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher T, Winter R (2006) Classification of business process management approaches – an exploratory analysis. BIT Bank Inf Technol 7:9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher T, Winter R (2008) Project types of business process management – towards a scenario structure to enable situational method engineering for business process management. University of St. Gallen (Working paper), St. Gallen

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher T, Klesse M, Kurpjuweit S, Winter R (2007) Situational method engineering – on the differentiation of “context” and “project type”. In: Ralyté J, Brinkkemper S, Henderson-Sellers B (eds) Situational method engineering – fundamentals and experiences (Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference, 12–14 September 2007, Geneva, Switzerland). Springer (International federation for information processing, vol 244), Boston, pp 33–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossentino M, Gaglio S, Henderson-Sellers B, Seidita V (2006) A metamodelling-based approach for method fragment comparison. In: Latour T, Petit M (eds) Proceedings of workshops and doctoral consortium (the 18th international conference on advanced information systems engineering – trusted information systems (CAiSE’06), Luxembourg). Presses Universitaires de Namur, Namur, pp 419–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1993) Process innovation – reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH, Short JE (1990) The New industrial engineering – information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Manage Rev 31:11–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies I, Reeves M (2014) BPM tool selection: the case of the Queensland court of justice. In: Brocke JV, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 1, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 371–392

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin T (2007) Insights into the evolution of BPM in organisations, proceedings of the 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2007). University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin T, Doebeli G (2014) An organizational approach to BPM: the experience of an Australian transport provider. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 2, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 741–760

    Google Scholar 

  • DeToro I, McCabe T (1997) How to stay flexible and elude fads. Qual Prog 30:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Dziuban CD, Shirkey EC (1974) When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Psychol Bull 81:358–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler FE (1964) A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 1:149–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M (1990) Reengineering work – don’t automate, obliterate. Harv Bus Rev 68:104–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M (2007) The process audit. Harv Bus Rev 85:111–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M (2014) What is business process management? In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 1, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M, Champy J (1993) Reengineering the corporation – a manifest for business revolution. HarperCollins Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M, Stanton SA (1995) The reengineering revolution – a handbook. Harper Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Härdle W, Simar L (2003) Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon P (2006) BPM methodologies and process maturity. http://www.bpmtrends.com/. (06.07.2006)

  • Harmon P (2014) The scope and evolution of business process management. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 1, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 37–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen AF (1997) Situational method engineering. Moret Ernst & Young Management Consultants, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen AF, Brinkkemper S, Oei H (1994) Situational method engineering for information system project approaches. In: Verrijn-Stuart AA, Olle TW (eds) Methods and associated tools for the information systems life cycle. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 169–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington HJ (1991) Business process improvement – the breakthrough strategy for total quality, productivity, and competitiveness. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington HJ (1995) Total improvement management – the next generation in performance improvement. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess T, Brecht L (1996) State of the Art des Business Process Redesign – Darstellung und Vergleich bestehender Methoden (in German language). Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q 28:75–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho SKM, Fung CKH (1994) Develo** a TQM excellence model. TQM Mag 6:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai M, Heymans B (1999) Gemba Kaizen. Berrett-Koehler Communications, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesus L, Macieira A, Karrer D, Caulliraux H (2014) BPM center of excellence: the case of a Brazilian company. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 2, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 399–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser HF, Rice J (1974) Little Jiffy, Mark Iv. Educ Psychol Meas 34:111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RB, Murdock L (1991) Rethinking the corporation – core process redesign. McKinsey Q 27:27–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K, Welke RJ (1992) Methodology engineering – a proposal for situation-specific methodology construction. In: Cotterman WW, Senn JA (eds) Challenges and strategies for research in systems development. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 257–269

    Google Scholar 

  • List B, Korherr B (2006) An evaluation of conceptual business process modelling languages. In: Liebrock LM (ed) Proceedings of the 21st annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC2006). ACM Press, New York, pp 1532–1539

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • March ST, Smith GF (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis Support Syst 15:251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maull RS, Tranfield DR, Maull W (2003) Factors characterising the maturity of BPR programmes. Int J Oper Prod Manag 23:596–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald MP, Aron D (2010) Leading in times of transition: the 2010 CIO agenda. Gartner, Stamford

    Google Scholar 

  • Melão N, Pidd M (2000) A conceptual framework for understanding business processes and business process modelling. Inf Syst J 10:105–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niehaves B (2006) The reflective designer – designing IT-consulting processes. Ph.D. thesis, University of Münster, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker JF Jr, Chen M, Purdin TDM (1990) Systems development in information systems research. J Manag Inf Syst 7:89–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard J-P, Armistead C (1999) Business process management – lessons learned from European business. Bus Process Manag J 5:10–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosemann M, De Bruin T (2005) Towards a business process management maturity model. In: Bartmann D, Rajola F, Kallinikos J, Avison D, Winter R, Ein-Dor P, Becker J, Bodendorf F, Weinhardt C (eds) Proceedings of the thirteenth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2005), Regensburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemann M, vom Brocke J (2014) The six core elements of business process management. In: Rosemann M, vom Brocke J (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 1, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 105–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemann M, de Bruin T, Power B (2006) BPM maturity. In: Jeston J, Nelis J (eds) Business process management. Practical guidelines to successful implementations. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 299–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz-Reiter B, Stahlmann H-D, Nethe A (1999) Process modelling. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanyi A (2014) The governance of business process management. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 2, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 333–349

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Hofstede AHM, van der Aalst WMP, Adams M, Russell N (2009) Modern business process automation: YAWL and its support environment, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst W, ter Hofstede A, Weske M (2003) Business process management: a survey. In: van der Aalst W, ter Hofstede A, Weske M (eds) Business process management conference (BPM 2003), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, LNCS2678, 2003, pp 1611–3349

    Google Scholar 

  • van Slooten K, Hodes B (1996) Characterizing IS development projects. In: Brinkkemper S, Lytinnen K, Welke RJ (eds) Method engineering – principles of method construction and tool support. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, pp 29–44

    Google Scholar 

  • vom Brocke J, Becker J, Braccini AM, Butleris R, Hofreiter B, Kapocius K, De Marco M, Schmidt G, Seidel S, Simons A, Skopal T, Stein A, Stieglitz S, Suomi R, Vossen G, Winter R, Wrycza S (2011) Current and future issues in BPM research: a European perspective from the ERCIS meeting 2010. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 28(1): Article 25, 393–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls JG, Widmeyer GR, El Sawy OA (1992) Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Inf Syst Res 3:36–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zairi M (1997) Business process management – a boundaryless approach to modern competitiveness. Bus Process Manag 3:64–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. PHOENIX Pharma-Einkauf GmbH, Mannheim, Germany

    Tobias Bucher

  2. Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen, Gallen, Switzerland

    David Raber

  3. Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Robert Winter

Authors
  1. Tobias Bucher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Raber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert Winter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Winter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Information Systems, University of Liechtenstein, Vaduz, Liechtenstein

    Jan vom Brocke

  2. School of Information Systems, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Michael Rosemann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bucher, T., Raber, D., Winter, R. (2015). A Taxonomy of Business Process Management Approaches. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds) Handbook on Business Process Management 2. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45103-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation