Common Citation Analysis and Technology Overlap Factor: An Empirical Investigation of Litigated Patents Using Network Analysis

  • Conference paper
Design Science Research in Information Systems. Advances in Theory and Practice (DESRIST 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7286))

  • 10k Accesses

Abstract

Companies incur huge costs in filing and defending patent lawsuits. A part of the problem arises from the fact that companies do not have a comprehensive understanding of the patents that they have cited and the patents that have cited their patents. By empirically analyzing the forward and backward citations of a set of litigated patents in the smart phone industry, we provide a method for profiling patents and identifying citation patterns. Our results show that while some patents share common forward and backward citations, others do not share any backward citations but share a lot of forward citations. We hypothesize that this maybe an indication of the convergence of different types of technologies. We also propose a new metric - Technology Overlap Factor - that can help in identifying convergence. In doing so, we provide a preliminary framework for further investigation and for building a patent analysis software system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Breitzman, A.F., Mogee, M.E.: The many applications of patent analysis. Journal of Information Science 28(3), 187–205 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fleming, J.: Valuing Patents: Assessing the Merit of Patent Citation Analysis. Undergraduate thesis. University of Virginia (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shaffer, M.J.: Entrepreneurial Innovation: Patent Rank and Marketing Science. Washington State University (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breitzman, A., Thomas, P.: Using Patent Citation Analysis to Target/Value Mergers and Acquisitions Candidates. Research-Technology Management 45, 28–29 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brinn, M.W., Fleming, J.M., Hannaka, F.M., Thomas, C.B., Beling, P.A.: Investigation of forward citation count as a patent analysis method. In: 2003 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, pp. 1–6 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Choi, C., Shin, J., Yoon, B., Lee, W., Park, Y.: On the linkage between industries and technologies: patent citation analysis. In: Proceedings of 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, vol. 2, pp. 576–578 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wu, H.C., Chen, H.Y., Lee, K.Y., Liu, Y.C.: A method for assessing patent similarity using direct and indirect citation links. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), pp. 149–152 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, Y.G., Suh, J.H., Park, S.C.: Visualization of patent analysis for emerging technology. Expert Systems with Applications 34, 1804–1812 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Daim, T.U., Rueda, G., Martin, H., Gerdsri, P.: Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73, 981–1012 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karvonen, M., Kässi, T.: Patent analysis for analysing technological convergence. Foresight 13(5), 34–50 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chien, C.V.: Predicting Patent Litigation. Texas Law Review 90, 283 (2011); Santa Clara Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17-11. SSRN, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1911579

  12. Delaney, T.Q., Pioli, J.: Navigating Recent Mobile Patent Lawsuits. Aspatore, Boston (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fighting the Smart Phone Wars. World Intellectual Property Review, pp. 12–19 (March 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hall, B.H., Ziedonis, R.H.: The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995. RAND Journal of Economics 32(1), 101–128 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hall, B.H., Ziedonis, R.: An empirical analysis of patent litigation in the semiconductor industry. University of California at Berkeley working paper (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hynes, J., Sinnott, T.: The US International Trade Commission: smartphone patent battles. Intellectural Property Magazine 39 (February 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lloyd, M., Spielthenner, D., Mokdsi, G.: The SmartPhone Patent Wars. IAM Journal, March 1-30 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ziedonis, R.H.: Don’t Fence Me In: Fragmented Markets for Technology and Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms. Management Science 50(6), 804–820 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. IPISC, from AIPLA Survey (2011), http://www.patentinsurance.com/iprisk/aipla-survey/ (retrieved December 2, 2011)

  20. Black, E.: from CCIA (July 16, 2009), http://www.ccianet.org/CCIA/files/ccLibraryFiles/Filename/000000000226/Ltr%20on%20Rpt%20SCP-13-51.pdf (retrieved December 2, 2011)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Velichety, S., Ram, S. (2012). Common Citation Analysis and Technology Overlap Factor: An Empirical Investigation of Litigated Patents Using Network Analysis. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds) Design Science Research in Information Systems. Advances in Theory and Practice. DESRIST 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7286. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29862-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29863-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation