An Empirical Comparison of Two Boosting Algorithms on Real Data Sets Based on Analysis of Scientific Materials

  • Conference paper
Advances in Computer Science, Intelligent System and Environment

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 105))

  • 1171 Accesses

Abstract

Boosting algorithms are a means of building a strong ensemble classifier by aggregating a sequence of weak hypotheses. In this paper, multiple TAN classifiers generated by GTAN are combined by a combination method called Boosting-MultiTAN. This TAN combination classifier is compared with the Boosting-BAN classifier which is boosting based on BAN combination. We conduct an empirical study to compare the performance of two algorithms, measured in terms of overall test correct rate, on ten real data sets. Finally, experimental results show that the Boosting-BAN has higher classification accuracy on most data sets, but Boosting-MultiTAN has good effect on others. These results argue that boosting algorithms deserve more attention in machine learning and data mining communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Unpublished manuscript available electronically (on our web pages, or by email request). An extended abstract appeared in Computational Learning Theory: Second European Conf., EuroCOLT 1995, pp. 23–37 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schapire, R.E., Freund, Y., Bartlett, Y., et al.: Boosting the margin: A new explanation for the effectiveness of voting methods. In: Fisher, D.H. (ed.) Proc. of the 14th Int’l Conf on Machine Learning, pp. 322–330. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Freund, Y.: Boosting a weak learning algorithm by majority. Information and Computation 121(2), 256–285 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Quinlan, J.R.: Bagging, Boosting, and C4.5. In: Ben-Eliyahu, R. (ed.) Proc of the 13th National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 725–730. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schapire, R.E.: The strength of weak learnability. Machine Learning 5(2), 197–227 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Friedman, N., Geiger, D., Goldszmidt, M.: Bayesian network classifiers. Machine Learning 29(2/3), 131–163 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng, J., Greiner, R.: Comparing Bayesian network classifiers. In: Laskey, K.B., Prade, H. (eds.) Proc of the 15th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 101–108. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng, J., Bell, D.A., Liu, W.: An algorithm for Bayesian belief network construction from data. In: Proc of AI & STAT 1997, Lauderdale, Florida, pp. 83–90 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shi, H., Huang, H., Wang, Z.: Boosting-Based TAN Combination Classifier. Journal of Computer Research and Development 41(2), 340–345 (2004)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. UCI Machine Learning Repository, http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sun, X., Zhou, H. (2011). An Empirical Comparison of Two Boosting Algorithms on Real Data Sets Based on Analysis of Scientific Materials. In: **, D., Lin, S. (eds) Advances in Computer Science, Intelligent System and Environment. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 105. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23756-0_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23756-0_53

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23755-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23756-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation