SpringerLink
Log in

Minirhizotrons in Modern Root Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Measuring Roots

  • 3513 Accesses

Abstract

In recent years, minirhizotrons have received increasing interest in field studies for characterising several biological processes, such as fine root production, root longevity, mycorrhization and parasitism, as collecting repeated video or digital images allows the fate of individual roots to be followed in time.

This review summarises recent technical improvements in root observation and imaging, comparing results from various construction materials and installation angles. Both glass and transparent acrylic or polycarbonate tubes have shown a relatively low influence on root behaviour; tilted tubes are preferred to vertically oriented ones, in order to avoid artefacts, and to horizontal ones, which involve considerable soil disturbance during positioning in their surroundings in the open field. Precise camera positioning systems and new high-resolution (600 DPI and more) digital sensors are currently replacing external-tracked tubes and analog sensors, enhancing image capturing and quality. This allows for frequent root observation throughout the plant cycle and seasons, required for accurate estimation of root dynamics.

Although manual and semi-automatic image analysis requires timing and tedious work, in the last few years minirhizotron systems have been increasingly used, thanks to fundamental advances in image analysis. The development of new algorithms for root detection and measurement in minirhizotron images has speeded up processing and research. The most interesting results in image analysis derive from the integration of luminance intensity- and geometry-based root vs. non-root classifiers. Discrepancies still remain between minirhizotron data and reference core sampling (root quantification) and carbon isotope methods (root turnover). Underestimation in root length mainly regards the top 0.3 m soil layer, and irreconcilable differences emerge between root life-span and root carbon residence time.

A critical point in minirhizotron studies is exact identification of root activity, and most of the previous work was based on manual or semi-automatic visual evaluation (e.g., root appearance/disappearance, colour, shrinking, blotting, cortex degradation). Natural root fluorescence under UV light is only a reliable feature of root activity in some plant species, but interesting perspectives are expected from visible and near-infrared spectral images. Roots of GFP-engineered (green fluorescent protein) plants can also be distinguished in mixed plant stands by specific camera adaptation (light wavelengths, filters).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aerts R, Bakker C, De Calluwe H (1992) Root turnover as determinant of cycling of C, N, and P in a dry heathland ecosystem. Biogeochemistry 15:175–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker TT III, Conner WH, Lockaby G, Stanturf JA, Burke MK (2001) Fine root productivity and dynamics on a forested floodplain in South Carolina. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:545–556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basile B, Bryla DR, Salsman M, Marsal J, Cirillo C, Johnson RS, Dejong TM (2007) Growth patterns and morphology of fine roots of size-controlling and invigorating peach rootstocks. Tree Physiol 27:231–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bates GH (1937) A device for the observation of root growth in the soil. Nature 139:966–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm W (1979) Methods of studying root systems. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Box JE Jr (1993) Use of the minirhizotron-miniature video camera technique for measuring root dynamics. Geoderma 56:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box JE Jr, Johnson JW (1987) Minirhizotron rooting comparisons of three wheat cultivars. In: Taylor HM (ed) Minirhizotron observation tubes: methods and applications for measuring rhizosphere dynamics. ASA special publication number 50. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Box JE Jr, Ramseur EL (1993) Minirhizotron wheat root data: comparisons to soil core root data. Agron J 85:1058–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bragg PL, Govi G, Cannell RQ (1983) A comparison of methods, including angled and vertical minirhizotrons, for studying root growth and distribution in a spring oat crop. Plant Soil 73:435–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DA, Upchurch DR (1987) Minirhizotrons: a summary of methods and instruments in current use. In: Taylor HM (ed) Minirhizotron observation tubes: methods and applications for measuring rhizosphere dynamics. ASA special publication number 50. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 15–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown ALP, Day FP, Stover DB (2009) Fine root biomass estimates from minirhizotron imagery in a shrub ecosystem exposed to elevated CO2. Plant Soil 317:45–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman MD, Dickson RE, Isebrands JG, Karnosky DF (1996) Root growth and physiology of potted and field-grown trembling aspen exposed to tropospheric ozone. Tree Physiol 16:145–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Ruijter FJ, Veen BW, Oijen M (1996) A comparison of soil core sampling and minirhizotrons to quantify root development of field-grown potatoes. Plant Soil 182:301–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Delannay X, Palmer RG (1982) Four genes controlling root fluorescence in soybean. Crop Sci 22:278–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowdy R, Smucker A, Dolan M, Ferguson J (1998) Automated image analyses for separating plant roots from soil debris elutriated from soil cores. Plant Soil 200:91–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dubach M, Russelle MP (1995) Reducing the cost of estimating root turnover with horizontally installed minirhizotrons. Agron J 89:258–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer D, Brown DA (1983) Relationship of fluorescent intensity to ion uptake and elongation rates of soybean roots. Plant Soil 72:127–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ephrath JE, Silberbush M, Berliner PR (1999) Calibration of minirhizotron readings against root length density data obtained from soil cores. Plant Soil 209:201–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faget M, Herrera JM, Stamp P, Aulinger-Leipner I, Frossard E, Liedgens M (2009) The use of green fluorescent protein as a tool to identify roots in mixed plant stands. Funct Plant Biol 36:930–937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faget M, Liedgens M, Stamp P, Flütsch P, Herrera JM (2010) A minirhizotron imaging system to identify roots expressing the green fluorescent protein. Comput Electron Agric 74:163–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco JA, Abrisqueta JM (1997) A comparison between minirhizotron and soil coring methods of estimating root distribution in young almond trees under trickle irrigation. J Hortic Sci 72:797–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Gijsman AJ, Floris J, Van Noordwijk M, Brouwer G (1991) An inflatable minirhizotron system for root observation with improved soil/tube contact. Plant Soil 134:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goins GD, Russelle MP (1996) Fine root demography in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant Soil 185:281–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson JJ, Knight JD, Van Rees KCJ (2007) Impact of ectomycorrhizal colonization of hybrid poplar on the remediation of diesel-contaminated soil. J Environ Qual 36:927–934

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo D, Mitchell RJ, Hendricks JJ (2004) Fine root branch orders respond differently to carbon source–sink manipulations in a longleaf pine forest. Oecologia 140:450–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guo D, Li H, Mitchell RJ, Han W, Hendricks JJ, Fahey TJ, Hendrick RL (2008) Fine root heterogeneity by branch order: exploring the discrepancy in root turnover estimates between minirhizotron and carbon isotopic methods. New Phytol 177:443–456

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson AC, Zhao AF, Andrén O (1994) Fine-root growth dynamics of two shrubs in semiarid rangeland in inner Mongolia, China. Ambio 23:225–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeraman DA, Juma NG (1993) A comparison of minirhizotron, core and monolith methods for quantifying barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and fababean (Vicia faba L.) root distribution. Plant Soil 148:29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS (1993) The dynamics of fine root length, biomass, and nitrogen content in two northern hardwood ecosystems. Can J For Res 23:2507–2520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS (1996) Application of minirhizotrons to understand root function in forests and other natural ecosystems. Plant Soil 185:293–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks JJ, Nadelhoffer KJ, Aber JD (1993) Assessing the role of fine roots in carbon and nitrogen cycling trends. Ecol Evol 8:174–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks JJ, Hendrick RL, Wilson CA, Mitchell RJ, Pecot SD, Guo D (2006) Assessing the patterns and controls of fine root dynamics: an empirical test and methodological review. J Ecol 94:40–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huck MG, Taylor HM (1982) The rhizotron as a tool for root research. Adv Agron 35:1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram KT, Leers GA (2001) Software for measuring root characters from digital images. Agron J 93:918–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MG, Meyer PF (1998) Mechanical advancing handle that simplifies minirhizotron camera registration and image collection. J Environ Qual 27:710–714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MG, Phillips DL, Tingey DT, Storm MJ (2000) Effects of elevated CO2, N-fertilization, and season on survival of ponderosa pine fine roots. Can J For Res 30:220–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MG, Tingey DT, Phillips DL, Storm MJ (2001) Advancing fine root research with minirhizotrons. Environ Exp Bot 45:263–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S, Gillespie AR, Seifert JR, Pope PE (2001) Comparison of minirhizotron and soil core methods for quantifying root biomass in a temperate alley crop** system. Agroforest Syst 50:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joslin JD, Wolf MH (1998) Impacts of water input manipulations on fine root production and mortality in a mature hardwood forest. Plant Soil 204:165–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joslin JD, Gaudinski JB, Torn MS, Riley WJ, Hanson PJ (2006) Fine-root turnover patterns and their relationship to root diameter and soil depth in a 14C-labeled hardwood forest. New Phytol 172:523–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura K, Yamasaki S (2003) Accurate root length and diameter measurement using NIH Image: use of Pythagorean distance for diameter estimation. Plant Soil 254:305–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kloeppel BD, Gower ST (1995) Construction and installation of acrylic minirhizotron tubes in forest ecosystems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:241–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kosola KR (1999) Laparoscopic sampling of roots of known age from an expandable-wall minirhizotron system. Agron J 91:876–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levan MA, Ycas JW, Hammel JW (1987) Light leak effects on near-surface soybean rooting. In: Taylor HM (ed) Minirhizotron observation tubes: methods and applications for measuring rhizosphere dynamics. ASA special publication number 50. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • López B, Sabate S, Gracia C (1996) An inflatable minirhizotron system for stony soils. Plant Soil 179:255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majdi H (1996) Root sampling methods – applications and limitations of the minirhizotron technique. Plant Soil 185:255–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Majdi H (2001) Changes in fine root production and longevity in relation to water and nutrient availability in a Norway spruce stand in northern Sweden. Tree Physiol 21:1057–1061

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Majdi H, Andersson P (2005) Fine root production and turnover in a Norway spruce stand in northern Sweden: effects of nitrogen and water manipulation. Ecosystems 8:191–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Majdi H, Kangas P (1997) Demography of fine roots in response to nutrient applications in a Norway spruce stand in southwestern Sweden. Ecoscience 4:199–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Majdi H, Smucker AJM, Persson H (1992) A comparison between minirhizotron and monolith sampling methods for measuring root growth of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Soil 147:127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael BL, Taylor HM (1987) Applications and limitations of rhizotrons and minirhizotrons. In: Taylor HM (ed) Minirhizotron observation tubes: methods and applications for measuring rhizosphere dynamics. ASA special publication number 50. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill SD (1992) Pressurized-wall minirhizotron for field observation of root growth dynamics. Agron J 84:755–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill SD, Doering EJ, Reichman GA (1987) Application of a minirhizotron with flexible, pressurized walls to a study of corn root growth. In: Taylor HM (ed) Minirhizotron observation tubes: methods and applications for measuring rhizosphere dynamics. ASA special publication number 50. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 131–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy SL, Smucker AJM (1995) Evaluation of video image analysis and line-intercept methods for measuring root systems of alfalfa and ryegrass. Agron J 87:865–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadelhoffer KJ (2000) The potential effects of N deposition on fine root-production in forest ecosystems. New Phytol 147:131139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakaji T, Noguchi K, Oguma H (2010) Classification of rhizosphere components using visible-near infrared spectral images. Plant Soil 310:245–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nater EA, Nater KD, Baker JM (1992) Application of artificial neural system algorithms to image-analysis of roots in soil. 1. Initial results. Geoderma 53:237–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neill C (1992) Comparison of soil coring and ingrowth methods for measuring belowground production. Ecology 73:1918–1921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norby RJ, Jackson RB (2000) Root dynamics and global change: seeking an ecosystem perspective. New Phytol 147:3–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norby RJ, Ledford J, Reilly CD, Miller NE, O’Neill EG (2004) Fine-root production dominates response of a deciduous forest to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9689–9693

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pagès L, Bengough AG (1997) Modelling minirhizotron observations to test experimental procedures. Plant Soil 189:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker CJ, Carra MKV, Jarvisa NJ, Puplampua BO LVH (1991) An evaluation of the minirhizotron technique for estimating root distribution in potatoes. J Agric Sci 116:341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passioura JB (1991) Soil structure and plant growth. Aust J Soil Res 29:717–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips DL, Johnson MG, Tingey DT, Biggart C, Nowak RS, Newsom JC (2000) Minirhizotron installation in sandy, rocky soils with minimal soil disturbance. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:761–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips DL, Johnson MG, Tingey DT, Catricala CE, Hoyman TL, Nowak RS (2006) Effects of elevated CO2 on fine root dynamics in a Mojave Desert community: a FACE study. Glob Change Biol 12:61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picon-Cochard C, Pilon R, Revaillot S, Jestin M, Dawson L (2009) Use of near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy to predict the percentage of dead versus living grass roots. Plant Soil 317:309–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pietola LM (2005) Root growth dynamics of spring cereals with discontinuation of mouldboard ploughing. Soil Till Res 80:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard SG, Rogers HH (2000) Spatial and temporal deployment of crop roots in CO2-enriched environments. New Phytol 147:55–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard SG, Prior SA, Rogers HH, Davis MA, Runion GB, Popham TW (2006) Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on root dynamics and productivity of sorghum grown under conventional and conservation agricultural management practices. Agric Ecosyst Environ 113:175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard SG, Strand AE, McCormack ML, Davis MA, Finzi AC, Jackson RB, Matamala R, Rogers HH, Oren R (2008a) Fine root dynamics in a loblolly pine forest are influenced by free-air-CO2-enrichment: a six-year-minirhizotron study. Glob Change Biol 14:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard SG, Strand AE, McCormack ML, Davis MA, Oren R (2008b) Mycorrhizal and rhizomorph dynamics in a loblolly pine forest during 5 years of free-air-CO2-enrichment. Glob Change Biol 14:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Richner W, Liedgens M, Biirgi H, Soldati A, Stamp P (2000) Root Image analysis and interpretation. In: Smit AL, Bengough AG, Engels C, van Noordwijk M, Pellerin S, van de Geijn SC (eds) Root methods – a handbook. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 304–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter DD, Markewitz D, Trumbore SE, Wells CG (1999) Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest. Nature 400:56–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruess RW, Hendrick RL, Bryant JP (1998) Regulation of fine root dynamics by mammalian browsers in early successional Alaskan taiga forests. Ecology 79:2706–2720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruess RW, Hendrick RL, Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Sveinbjornssön B, Allen MF, Maurer GE (2003) Coupling fine root dynamics with ecosystem carbon cycling in black spruce forests of interior Alaska. Ecol Monogr 73:643–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samson BK, Sinclair TR (1994) Soil core and minirhizotron comparison for the determination of root length density. Plant Soil 161:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman JJ, Goedewaagen MAJ (1971) Methods for the examination of root systems and roots: methods in use at the Institute for Soil Fertility for eco-morphological root investigations, 2nd edn. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation in Wageningen Pudoc, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit AL, Groenwold J (2005) Root characteristics of selected field crops: data from the Wageningen Rhizolab (1990–2002). Plant Soil 272:365–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smit AL, Vamerali T (1998) The influence of potato cyst nematodes (Globodera pallida) and drought on rooting dynamics of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Eur J Agron 9:137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit AL, Zuin A (1996) Root growth dynamics of Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea var gemmifera) and leeks (Allium porrum L) as reflected by root length, root colour and UV fluorescence. Plant Soil 185:271–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smit AL, Groenwold J, Vos J (1994a) The Wageningen rhizolab – a facility to study soil-root-shoot-atmosphere interactions in crops. 2. Methods of root observations. Plant Soil 161:289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit AL, Sprangers JFCM, Sablik PW, Groenwold J (1994b) Automated measurement of root length with a three-dimensional high-resolution scanner and image analysis. Plant Soil 158:145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steen E (1991) Usefulness of the mesh bag method in quantitative root studies. In: Atkinson D (ed) Plant root growth. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 75–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinaker DF, Wilson SD (2008) Scale and density dependent relationships among roots, mycorrhizal fungi and collembola in grassland and forest. Oikos 117:703–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens GN, Jones RH, Mitchell RJ (2002) Rapid fine root disappearance in a pine woodland: a substantial carbon flux. Can J For Res 32:2225–2230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strand AE, Pritchard SG, McCormack ML, Davis MA, Oren R (2008) Irreconcilable differences: fine-root life spans and soil carbon persistence. Science 319:456–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor HM, Böhm W (1976) Use of acrylic plastic as rhizotron windows. Agron J 68:693–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney GL, Fahey TJ (2001) Evaluation of minirhizotron estimates of fine root longevity in the forest floor of a temperate broadleaf forest. Plant Soil 229:167–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney GL, Fahey TJ (2002) Fine root turnover in a northern hardwood forest: a direct comparison of the radiocarbon and minirhizotron methods. Can J For Res 32:1692–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingey DT, Phillips DL, Johnson MG (2003) Optimizing minirhizotron sample frequency for an evergreen and deciduous tree species. New Phytol 157:155–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vamerali T, Ganis A, Bona S, Mosca G (1999) An approach to minirhizotron root image analysis. Plant Soil 217:183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vamerali T, Ganis A, Bona S Mosca G (2002) Advances in minirhizotron root image analysis. In: Proceedings of the VII ESA Congress, 15–18 July 2002, Córdoba, Spain, pp 419–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Vamerali T, Ganis A, Bona S, Mosca G (2003a) Fibrous root turnover and growth in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var saccharifera) as affected by nitrogen shortage. Plant Soil 255:169–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vamerali T, Guarise M, Ganis A, Bona S, Mosca G (2003b) Analysis of root images from auger sampling with a fast procedure: a case of application to sugar beet. Plant Soil 255:387–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vamerali T, Ganis A, Mosca G (2009) Methods for thresholding minirhizotron root images In: Proceedings of the seventh international symposium “Root Research and Applications” RootRAP, 2–4 September 2009, Boku, Vienna, Austria, pp 1–2 (CD-ROM)

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Geijn SC, Vos J, Groenwold J, Goudriaan J, Leffelaar PA (1994) The Wageningen rhizolab – a facility to study soil-root-shoot-atmosphere interactions in crops. 1. Description of main functions. Plant Soil 161:275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Krift TAJ, Berendse F (2002) Root life spans of four grass species from habitats differing in nutrient availability. Funct Ecol 16:198–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk M, De Jager A, Floris J (1985) A new dimension to observations in minirhizotrons: a stereoscopic view on root photographs. Plant Soil 86:447–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veen BW, Van Noordwijk M, De Willigen P, Boone FR, Kooistra MJ (1992) Root-soil contact of maize, as measured by a thin-section technique. III. Effects on shoot growth, nitrate and water uptake efficiency. Plant Soil 139:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos J, Groenwold J (1987) The relation between root growth along observation tubes and in bulk soil. In: Taylor HM (ed) Minirhizotron observation tubes: methods and applications for measuring rhizosphere dynamics. ASA special publication number 50. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Burch WH, Mou P, Jones RH, Mitchell RJ (1995) Accuracy of visible and ultraviolet light for estimating live root proportions with minirhizotrons. Ecology 76:2330–2334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells CE, Eissenstat DM (2001) Marked differences in survivorship among apple roots of different diameter. Ecology 82:882–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesler F, Horst WF (1994) Root growth of maize cultivars under field conditions as studied by the core and minirhizotron method and relationships to shoot growth. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 157:351–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams SM, Weil RR (2003) Crop cover root channels may alleviate soil compaction effects on soybean crop. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:1403–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Withington JM, Elkin AD, Bułaj B, Olesiński J, Tracy KN, Bouma TJ, Oleksyn J, Anderson LJ, Modrzyński J, Reich PB, Eissenstat DM (2003) The impact of material used for minirhizotron tubes for root research. New Phytol 160:533–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng G, Birchfield ST, Wells CE (2006) Detecting and measuring fine roots in minirhizotron images using matched filtering and local entropy thresholding. Mach Vision Appl 17:265–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng G, Birchfield ST, Wells CE (2008) Automatic discrimination of fine roots in minirhizotron images. New Phytol 177:549–557

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng G, Birchfield ST, Wells CE (2010) Rapid automated detection of roots in minirhizotron images. Mach Vision Appl 21:309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Parma, Viale G.P. Usberti 11/A, 43100, Parma, Italy

    Teofilo Vamerali

  2. Department of Environmental Agronomy and Crop Sciences, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020, Legnaro, Padova, Italy

    Marianna Bandiera & Giuliano Mosca

Authors
  1. Teofilo Vamerali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marianna Bandiera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giuliano Mosca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teofilo Vamerali .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dipto. Ortoflorofrutticoltura, Università Firenze, Viale delle Idee 30, Sesto Fiorentino, 50019, Italy

    Stefano Mancuso

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vamerali, T., Bandiera, M., Mosca, G. (2012). Minirhizotrons in Modern Root Studies. In: Mancuso, S. (eds) Measuring Roots. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22067-8_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation