Pattern Classification Techniques for EMG Signal Decomposition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Biosignal Processing
  • 2461 Accesses

Abstract

The electromyographic (EMG) signal decomposition process is addressed by develo** different pattern classification approaches. Single classifier and multiclassifier approaches are described for this purpose. Single classifiers include: certainty-based classifiers, classifiers based on the nearest neighbour decision rule: the fuzzy k-NN classifiers, and classifiers that use a correlation measure as an estimation of the degree of similarity between a pattern and a class template: the matched template filter classifiers. Multiple classifier approaches aggregate the decision of the heterogeneous classifiers aiming to achieve better classification performance. Multiple classifier systems include: one-stage classifier fusion, diversity-based one-stage classifier fusion, hybrid classifier fusion, and diversity-based hybrid classifier fusion schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexandre L A, Campilho A C and M. Kamel (2001) On combining classifiers using sum and product rules. Pattern Recognition Letters, 22:1283–1289

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Andreassean S (1987) Methods for computer-aided measurement of motor unit parameters. The London Symposia – Supplement 39 to Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 13–20

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atiya A F (1992) Recognition of multiunit neural signals. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 39(7):723–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brunelli R and Falavigna D (1995) Person identification using multiple cues. IEEE Transactions in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17(10):955–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chauvet E, Fokapu O, Hogrel J Y et al (2003) Automatic identification of motor unit action potential trains from electromyographic signals using fuzzy techniques. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 41:646–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho Sung-Bae and Kim J H (1995) Combining multiple neural networks by fuzzy integral for robust classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 25(2):380–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho Sung-Bae and Kim J H (1995) Multiple network fusion using fuzzy logic. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 6(2):497–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(2):37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duda R O, Hart P E and Stork D (2001) Pattern Classification. John Wiley & Sons, 2nd edition

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Duin R (2002) The combining classifier: to train or not to train? In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2:765–770

    Google Scholar 

  11. Duin R and Taz D (2000) Experiments with classifier combining rules. In J Kittler and F Roli, editors, Multiple Classifier Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1857:16–29, Gagliari, Italy, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  12. Etawil H A Y (1994) Motor unit action potentials: discovering temporal relations of their trains and resolving their superpositions. Master’s thesis, University of Waterloo.,Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fang J, Agarwal G and Shahani B (1999) Decomposition of multiunit electromyogram signals. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 46(6):685–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleiss J L, Levin B and Paik M C (2003) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. John Wiley & Sons, 3rd edition

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Florestal J R, Mathieu P A and Malanda A (2004) Automatic decomposition of simulated EMG signals. In Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the Canadian Medical and Biological Engineering Society, 29–30

    Google Scholar 

  16. Florestal J R, Mathieu P A and Malanda A (2006) Automated decomposition of intramuscular electromyographic signals. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 53(5):832–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Florestal J R, Mathieu P A and Palmondon R (2007) A genetic algorithm for the resolution of superimposed motor unit action potentials. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 54(12):2163–2171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Giacinto G and Roli F (2001) An approach to the automatic design of multiple classifier systems. Pattern Recognition Letters, 22:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gut R and Moschytz G S (2000) High-precision EMG signal decomposition using communication techniques. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 48(9):2487–2494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hamilton-Wright A and Stashuk D W (2005) Physiologically based simulation of clinical EMG signals. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 52(2):171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hassoun M H, Wang C and Spitzer R (1994) Nnerve: Neural network extraction of repetitive vectors for electromyography – part i: algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 41(11):1039–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hassoun M H, Wang C and Spitzer R (1994). Nnerve: Neural network extraction of repetitive vectors for electromyography – part ii: performance analysis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 41(11):1053–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kamel M S and Wanas N M (2003) Data dependence in combining classifiers. In T.Windeatt and F. Roli, editors, Multiple Classifier Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2790: 1–14 Guilford UK Springer

    Google Scholar 

  24. Keller J M, Gray M R, and Givens J A (1985) A fuzzy k-nearest neighbor algorithm. IEEE Trans Systems Man and Cybernetics, 15(4):580–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kittler J M, Hatef M, Duin R P V et al. (1998) On combining classifiers. IEEE Transactions in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(3):955–966

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lam L and Suen C Y (1997) Application of majority voting to pattern recognition: an analysis of its behavior and performance. IEEE Transaction on Systems Man and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, 27(5):553–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. LeFever R S and De Luca C J (1982) A procedure for decomposing the myoelectric signal into its constituent action potentials – part i: technique, theory, and implementation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 29(3):149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Loudon G H, Jones N B and Sehmi A S (1992) New signal processing techniques for the decompositon of emg signals. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 30(11): 591–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McGill K C (1984) A method for quantitating the clinical electromyogram. PhD dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  30. McGill K C, Cummins K and Dorfman L J (1985) Automatic decomposition of the clinical electromyogram. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 32(7):470–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mirfakhraei K and Horch K (1997) Recognition of temporally changing action potentials in multiunit neural recordings. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 44(2):123–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hamid Nawab S, Wotiz R and De Luca C J (2004) Improved resolution of pulse superpositions in a knowledge-based system EMG decomposition. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1: 69–71

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nikolic M, Sørensen J A, Dahl K et al. (1997) Detailed analysis of motor unit activity. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference, 1257–1260

    Google Scholar 

  34. Paoli G M (1993) Estimating certainty in classification of motor unit action potentials. Master’s thesis, University of Waterloo., Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  35. Partridge D and Yates W B (1996) Engineering multiversion neural-net systems. Neural Computation, 8:869–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rasheed S (2006) A multiclassifier approach to motor unit potential classification for EMG signal decomposition. Ph. D. dissertation, URL: http://etd.uwaterloo.ca/etd/srasheed2006.pdf, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

  37. Rasheed S (2008) Diversity-Based Hybrid Classifier Fusion: A Practical Approach to Motor Unit Potential Classification for Electromyographic Signal Decomposition. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rasheed S, Stashuk D and Kamel M (2004) Multi-classification techniques applied to EMG signal decomposition. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC 04, 2:1226–1231, The Hugue, The Netherland

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rasheed S, Stashuk D and Kamel M (2006) Adaptive certainty-based classification for decomposition of EMG signals. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 44(4):298–310

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rasheed S, Stashuk D and Kamel M (2006) Adaptive fuzzy k-NN classifier for EMG signal decomposition. Medical Engineering & Physics 28(7):694–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rasheed S, Stashuk D and Kamel M (2008) Fusion of multiple classifiers for motor unit potential sorting. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 3(3):229–243

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rasheed S, Stashuk D and Kamel M (2008). A software package for motor unit potential classification using fuzzy k-NN classifier. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 89:56–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rasheed S, Stashuk D and Kamel M (2009) Integrating heterogeneous classifier ensembles for EMG signal decomposition based on classifier agreement. Accepted for publication in IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine and now is published on-line at http://www.ieeexplore.ieee.org

  44. Rasheed S, Stashuk D and Kamel M (2007) A hybrid classifier fusion approach for motor unit potential classification during EMG signal decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 54(9):1715–1721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rasheed S, Stashuk D and Kamel M (2008) Diversity-based combination of non-parametric classifiers for EMG signal decomposition. Pattern Analysis & Applications, 11:385–408

    Google Scholar 

  46. Stashuk D W (1999) Decomposition and quantitative analysis of clinical electromyographic signals. Medical Engineering & Physics, 21:389–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Stashuk D W (2001) EMG signal decomposition: how can it be accomplished and used? Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 11:151–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Stashuk D W and de Bruin H (1988) Automatic decomposition of selective needle-detected myoelectric signals. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 35(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Stashuk D W and Paoli G (1998) Robust supervised classification of motor unit action potentials. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 36(1):75–82

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stefano L D and Mattoccia S (2003) Fast template matching using bounded partial correlation. Machine Vision and Applications, 13:213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sugeno M (1977) Fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals - a survey. In Fuzzy Automata and Decision Processes 89–102 North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  52. Xu L, Krzyzak A and Suen C Y (1992) Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their applications to handwriting recognition. IEEE Transaction on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 22(3):418–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zennaro D, Wellig P, Koch V. M et al. (2003) A software package for the decomposition of long-term multi-channel EMG signals using wavelet coefficients. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 50(1):58–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarbast Rasheed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rasheed, S., Stashuk, D. (2009). Pattern Classification Techniques for EMG Signal Decomposition. In: Naït-Ali, A. (eds) Advanced Biosignal Processing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89506-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89506-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89505-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89506-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation