Radical Ekphrasis; or, An Ethics of Seeing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Translating across Sensory and Linguistic Borders

Abstract

In ‘Radical Ekphrasis; or, An Ethics of Seeing’ poet and translator Sophie Collins applies Susan Sontag’s description of photography to another mode of representation: ekphrastic poetry. Presented here as a form of intersemiotic translation—a hermeneutic practice that converts visual representations into verbal representations—ekphrasis is considered in terms of its neglected radical aesthetic and political possibilties. Specifically, through reference to the available theory and contemporary examples of ekphrastic poetry, Collins considers how the conventional ekphrastic dynamic, as informed by sexist formulations of Michel Foucault’s gaze, might be subverted through engagement with alternative strategies, source materials and contexts of reception. Collins concludes this study by reflecting on two of her own ekphrastic poems, ‘Healers’ and ‘Thank You For Your Honesty’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Thailand)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 128.39
Price includes VAT (Thailand)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 159.99
Price excludes VAT (Thailand)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Oft-cited examples from Anglophone literature include John Keats’s “Ode on a Grecian Urn” (1820), W.H. Auden’s “Musée des Beaux Arts” (1939) and John Ashberry’s “Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror” (1974).

  2. 2.

    In which a toddler, looking into a mirror, first realises their external appearance, inducing further apperceptions.

  3. 3.

    See, for example, the work of Linda Nochlin, Judy Chicago, Griselda Pollock and Chris Kraus.

  4. 4.

    See, for example, the Advancing Women Artists Foundation: www.advancingwomenartists.org/invisible-women.php; the Gallery Tally: gallerytally.tumblr.com.

  5. 5.

    As its title would suggest, Morgan adopts photographs as the source material for this book-length ekphrastic project.

  6. 6.

    In his introduction to Poets on Painters: Essays on the Art of Painting by Twentieth-Century Poets, J. D. McClatchy provides a strangely sensual account of the ekphrastic impulse: ‘to trace the beloved’s body is a traditional poetic feat, and a painting is as beguiling as any idealized lip or lash, any fetish’ (McClatchy1988: xiii).

  7. 7.

    Invoked here too is Russ’s concept of ‘anomalousness’; if Sexton is death-obsessed, why then is Auden not ‘morbid’ or ‘morose’?

  8. 8.

    Via Google.com, last checked 4 February 2018.

  9. 9.

    There is, of course, equally a type of experience that occurs in the museum that is impossible online; most importantly, we are able to gain a physical sense of the object, its dimensions, its texture, its impact on a room.

  10. 10.

    The leaked nudes of Jennifer Lawrence, Kim Kardashian and others, and the threats of (sexual) violence made towards Zoe Quinn, Anita Sarkeesian and Emma Watson, can be traced back to 4chan’s boards. More recently, the site has been attributed blame for generating support for Donald Trump among young white males, and the recent uprise in fascist support and fascist visibility in mainstream contexts.

  11. 11.

    This raises a question regarding the limits of ekphrasis in poetry: if the majority of poems contain some element of imagery or visual description, surely all poems can be classified as ekphrasis to some degree? Ekphrasis might be usefully differentiated by distinguishing between poetry that simply describes the visual (imagery) and that which describes a visual representation (ekphrasis).

References

  • Allen, Rachael. 2014. Faber New Poets 9. London: Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Elizabeth. 1979. “In the Waiting Room.” In The Complete Poems 1927–1979, edited by Elizabeth Bishop. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux. https://www.poets.org/poetsorg/poem/waiting-room. Accessed January 28, 2018.

  • Capildeo, Vahni. 2016. “Snake in the Grass.” In Currently & Emotion: Translations, 291. London: Test Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadas, Rachel. 2009. “To Really See the Dragon.” In In the Frame: Women’s Ekphrastic Poetry from Marianne Moore to Susan Wheeler, edited by Jane Hedley, Nick Halpern, and Willard Spiegelman, 107–18. Newark, NJ: University of Delaware Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedley, Jane. 2009. “Introduction: The Subject of Ekphrasis.” In In the Frame: Women’s Ekphrastic Poetry from Marianne Moore to Susan Wheeler, edited by Jane Hedley, Nick Halpern, and Willard Spiegelman, 15–40. Newark, NJ: University of Delaware Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, James A.W. 1993. Museum of Words. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, Ben. 2013. “The Actual World.” The Frieze (156), June 16. https://frieze.com/article/actual-world. Accessed May 30, 2018.

  • Loizeaux, Elizabeth Bergmann. 2009. “Women Looking: The Feminist Ekphrasis of Marianne Moore and Adrienne Rich.” In In the Frame: Women’s Ekphrastic Poetry from Marianne Moore to Susan Wheeler, edited by Jane Hedley, Nick Halpern, and Willard Spiegelman, 121–44. Newark, NJ: University of Delaware Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClatchy, J.D. 1988. Poets on Painters: Essays on the Art of Painting by Twentieth-Century Poets. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, Laura. 1975. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Screen 16 (3): 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6. Accessed May 30, 2018.

  • Pollock, Griselda. 1992. “The Gaze and the Look: Women with Binoculars—A Question of Difference.” In Dealing with Degas: Representations of Women and the Politics of Vision, edited by Richard Kendall and Griselda Pollock, 106–30. London: Pandora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, Joanna. 1984. How to Suppress Women’s Writing. London: The Women’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, Anne. 2000. Selected Poems. Edited by Diane Wood Middlebrook and Diana Hume George. Boston and New York: Mariner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, Susan. 1979. On Photography. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, Leo. 1962 “‘The Ode on a Grecian Urn,’ or Content vs. Metagrammar.” Essays on English and American Literature, edited by Anna Hatcher, 67–97. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyerl, Hito. 2010. “A Thing Like You and Me.” Henie Onstad Art Centre, Norway, May 20–August 15. Exhibition Catalogue. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/15/61298/a-thing-like-you-and-me/. Accessed May 30, 2018.

  • Van Gogh Museum. n.d. “691: To Theo van Gogh. Arles, on or about Saturday, 29 September 1888.” Van Gogh Letters, para. 5 of 21. http://www.vangoghletters.org/vg/letters/let691/letter.html#translation. Accessed April 6, 2013.

  • Venuti, Lawrence. 2010. “Ekphrasis, Translation Critique.” Art in Translation 2 (2): 131–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Collins, S. (2019). Radical Ekphrasis; or, An Ethics of Seeing. In: Campbell, M., Vidal, R. (eds) Translating across Sensory and Linguistic Borders. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97244-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97244-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97243-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97244-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation