Rogers-Ramanujan Functions, Modular Functions, and Computer Algebra

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computer Algebra (WWCA 2016)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 226))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Many generating functions for partitions of numbers are strongly related to modular functions. This article introduces such connections using the Rogers-Ramanujan functions as key players. After exemplifying basic notions of partition theory and modular functions in tutorial manner, relations of modular functions to q-holonomic functions and sequences are discussed. Special emphasis is put on supplementing the ideas presented with concrete computer algebra. Despite intended as a tutorial, owing to the algorithmic focus the presentation might contain aspects of interest also to the expert. One major application concerns an algorithmic derivation of Felix Klein’s classical icosahedral equation.

Dedicated to the symbolic summation pioneer Sergei Abramov who concretely passed milestone 70

Both authors were supported by grant SFB F50-06 of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 85.59
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    i.e., it does not satisfy a linear recurrence with polynomial coefficients.

  2. 2.

    In our context it is convenient to normalize as in (9) instead of using the version \(\varDelta (\tau ):= (2 \pi )^{12} \eta (\tau )^{24}\).

  3. 3.

    Despite the cosets being assumed to be pairwise different, it may well be that \([\gamma _i \infty ]_\varGamma =[\gamma _j \infty ]_\varGamma \) for \(i\ne j\).

  4. 4.

    Recall, \(T=\left( {0 \atop 1}{ -1 \atop 0}\right) \), \(S=\left( {1 \atop 0}{ 1 \atop 1}\right) \).

  5. 5.

    \(\left( {0 \atop -1}{ 1 \atop 0}\right) \left( {a \atop 2 c'}{ b \atop d}\right) \left( {0 \atop 1}{ -1 \atop 0}\right) =\left( {d \atop -b}{ -2 c' \atop a}\right) \) implies \(\left( {1 \atop 0}{ 2 \atop 1}\right) \in T^{-1} \varGamma _0(2) T\).

  6. 6.

    The \(B_n\) are the Bernoulli numbers; as for \(\varDelta \), also for the Eisenstein series we prefer the normalized versions.

  7. 7.

    By Lemma 4.

  8. 8.

    By Lemma 4.

  9. 9.

    i.e., a commutative ring with 1 which is also a vector space over \(\mathbb {C}\).

  10. 10.

    In fact one can use the observation (75) from Sect. 13.

  11. 11.

    \(\pi ^{-1}(V_M)\) contains \(\frac{a}{c}\) (\(=\gamma \infty \)), and \(\pi ^{-1}(V_M)\setminus \{\frac{a}{c}\}\) is an open disc in \(\mathbb {H}\) tangent to the real line at \(\frac{a}{c}\).

  12. 12.

    Apart from the requirement to be a homeomorphism, a second property one needs to verify is that such \(\varphi \) also satisfy the Riemann surface compatibility conditions; see, e.g., [11, 25].

  13. 13.

    Cf. Example 6.

  14. 14.

    It is important to note that the orbit sets of modular transformations are discrete; i.e., they do not have a limit point.

  15. 15.

    Often one restricts to consider such functions only on a complete set of orbit representatives; for example, in the case of \(\varGamma =\mathrm {SL}_2(\mathbb {Z})\) to \(\{\tau \in \mathbb {H}: -1/2\leqslant \mathrm {Re}(\tau )\leqslant 0 \, \text{ and }\, \mathrm {Im}(\tau ) \geqslant \mathrm {Im}(e^{i \tau })\}\cup \{0< \mathrm {Re}(\tau )<1/2 \, \text{ and }\, \mathrm {Im}(\tau ) > \mathrm {Im}(e^{i \tau }) \}\) .

  16. 16.

    Equivalently, \(\varPsi _2\) has single poles at all the elements of the orbit \([\infty ]_{\varGamma _0(2)}\).

  17. 17.

    i.e., q is transcendental over \(\mathbb {F}\).

  18. 18.

    See, for instance, [19].

  19. 19.

    That \(((q,q)_n a_n)_{n\geqslant 0}\) is q-holonomic is immediate by q-holonomic closure properties.

  20. 20.

    See, for instance, [19].

  21. 21.

    See [27] for more information about such finite versions of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities.

  22. 22.

    F(z) is also a q-hypergeometric series; its summand sequence \(\left( f_k(z)\right) _{k\geqslant 0}\) is q-hypergeometric over \(\mathbb {K}\) with \(\mathbb {K}=\mathbb {Q}(z)(q)\).

  23. 23.

    In case no such order 2 equation exists, one proceeds with incrementing the order by one.

  24. 24.

    An excellent account on convergence questions related to the Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction is [10].

  25. 25.

    By stereographic projection the rotations of the sphere turn into Möbius transformations \(z\mapsto \frac{a z + b}{c z +d}\) of the complex plane.

  26. 26.

    This is also immediate from the q-expansion (37) of \(R(\tau )\) at \(\infty \).

  27. 27.

    And also taking into account the fact that j has zeros of multiplicity 3 at each element of the orbit \([\omega ]_{\mathrm {SL}_2(\mathbb {Z})}\), and no zero elsewhere; see Example 38.

  28. 28.

    To obtain an explicit form of this expression set, for instance, \(b_{g,h}(N)=0\) on the right side of [8, (24)].

  29. 29.

    Warning: in many texts on Jacobi theta functions \(q=e^{\pi i \tau }\), in contrast to \(q=e^{2\pi i \tau }\) as throughout this article.

  30. 30.

    The first such “folklore theorem” we considered was Theorem 33.

  31. 31.

    In addition, \(\varphi \) is supposed to be compatible with the other charts; see e.g. [25].

  32. 32.

    From modular forms point of view, (77) deals with the case of forms of weight zero only.

References

  1. Abramov, S.A., Paule, P., Petkovsek, M.: \(q\)-Hypergeometric solutions of \(q\)-difference equations. Discrete Math. 180, 3–22 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abramov, S.A., Petkovsek, M.: Finding all \(q\)-hypergeometric solutions of q-difference equations. In: Leclerc, B., Thibon, J.-Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the FPSAC95 (Noisy-le-Grand, 1995), Univ. de Marne-la-Vallée, pp. 1–10 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ahlfors, L.V.: Complex Analysis, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andrews, G.E.: \(q\)-Series: their development and application in analysis, number theory, combinatorics, physics, and computer algebra. CBMS Reg. Conf. Ser. Math. (66). AMS (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andrews, G.E., Askey, R., Roy, R.: Special Functions. Cambridge University Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andrews, G.E., Berndt, B.C.: Ramanujan’s Lost Notebook Part I. Springer, New York (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Andrews, G.E., Berndt, B.C.: Ramanujan’s Lost Notebook Part III. Springer, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berndt, B.C.: Generalized Dedekind eta-functions and generalized Dedekind sums. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 178, 495–508 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berndt, B.C., Chan, H.H., Huang, S.-S., Kang, S-Y., Sohn, J., Son, S.H.: The Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 105(1), 9–24 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bowman, D., Mc Laughlin, J.: On the divergence of the Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction on the unit circle. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 356, 3325–3345 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Diamond, F., Shurman, J.: A First Course in Modular Forms. Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dieter, U.: Das Verhalten der Kleinschen Funktionen \(\log _{g, h} (\omega _1, \omega _2)\) gegenüber Modultransformationen und verallgemeinerte Dedekindsche Summen. J. Reine Angew. Math. 201, 37–70 (1959)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, http://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.0.14 of 2016-12-21, Olver, F.W.J., Olde Daalhuis, A.B., Lozier, D.W., Schneider, B.I., Boisvert, R.F., Clark, C.W., Miller, B.R., Saunders, B.V., (eds) (2016)

  14. Duke, W.: Continued fractions and modular functions. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 42 (2005), 137–162

    Google Scholar 

  15. Farkas, H.M., Kra, I.: Theta constants, riemann surfaces and the modular group. Grad. Stud. Math., vol. 37. AMS (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Garvan, F.: A \(q\)-product tutorial for a \(q\)-series MAPLE package. SĂ©m. Lothar. Combin. 42, Art. B42d, 27 p. (1999) (electronic)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hemmecke, R.: Dancing samba with Ramanujan partition congruences. J. Symb. Comput. 14 (2016) (To appear)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kauers, M., Koutschan, C.: A Mathematica package for \(q\)-holonomic sequences and power series. Ramanujan J. 19(2), 137–150 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kauers, M., Paule, P.: The Concrete Tetrahedron. Texts and Monographs in Symbolic Computation. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Klein, F.: Lectures on the Icosahedral Equation and the Solutions of Equations of the Fifth Degree, 2nd edn. Dover (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lewittes, J.: Analytic continuation of Eisenstein series. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 177, 469–490 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Mazur, M., Petrenko, B.V.: Representations of analytic functions as infinite products and their application to numerical computations. Ramanujan J. 34, 129–141 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. McKean, H., Moll, V.: Elliptic Curves: Function Theory, Geometry, Arithmetic. Cambridge University Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Meyer, C.: Über einige Anwendungen Dedekindscher Summen. J. Reine Angew. Math. 198, 143–203 (1957)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Miranda, R.: Algebraic Curves and Riemann Surfaces. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 5. AMS (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ono, K.: The Web of Modularity: Arithmetic of the Coefficients of Modular Forms and \(q\)-Series. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, Vol. 102. AMS (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Paule, P.: Short and easy computer proofs of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities and of identities of similar type. Electron. J. Combin. 1, 1–9 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Paule, P., Riese, A.: A Mathematica \(q\)-analogue of Zeilberger’s algorithm based on an algebraically motivated approach to q-hypergeometric telesco**. In: Ismail, M.E.H., Rahman, M. (eds.) Special Functions, q-Series and Related Topics. Fields Institute Communications, vol. 14, pp. 179–210. AMS (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Paule, P., Radu, C-S.: Partition analysis, modular functions, and computer algebra. In: Beveridge, A., Griggs, J.R., Hogben, L., Musiker, G., Tetali, P. (eds.) Recent Trends in Combinatorics, IMA Vol. Mathematical Applications, Vol. 159, pp. 511–544. Springer (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Paule, P., Radu, C-S.: A new witness identity for \(11|p(11n+6)\). In: Alladi, K., Andrews, G.E., Garvan, F. (eds.) Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics. Springer (2017), To appear

    Google Scholar 

  31. Radu, C.-S.: An algorithmic approach to Ramanujan-Kolberg identities. J. Symbolic Comput. 68, 1–33 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Robins, S.: Generalized Dedekind products. Ser. Contemp. Math. 166, 119–128 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Schoeneberg, B.: Elliptic Modular Functions. Springer (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stein, W.: Modular Forms, a Computational Approach. AMS (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stein, W.A., et al.: Sage Mathematics Software (Version 8.0). The Sage Development Team (2017). http://www.sagemath.org

  36. Toth, G.: Glimpses of Algebra and Geometry. Springer (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wilf, H.S., Zeilberger, D.: An algorithmic proof theory for hypergeometric (ordinary and “\(q\)”) multisum/integral identities. Invent. Math. 108, 575–633 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yang, Y.: Transformation formulas for generalized Dedekind eta functions. Bull. London Math. Soc. 36, 671–682 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Zagier, D.: Ramanujan an Hardy: Vom ersten bis zum letzten Brief. Mitt. Dtsch. Math.-Ver. 18, 21–28 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A preliminary version of this article has been presented at FELIM 2017 in Limoges, France. Peter Paule thanks Moulay Barkatou and his colleagues for organizing such a wonderful conference. When preparing the final version of this article, Peter Paule was enjoying outstanding hospitality at the Tian** Center for Applied Mathematics (TCAM), China. Sincerest thanks to Bill Chen and his group for all the kindness! We also want to thank the anonymous referee for carefully reading the paper and giving us several suggestions on how to improve our paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Paule .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Paule, P., Radu, S. (2018). Rogers-Ramanujan Functions, Modular Functions, and Computer Algebra. In: Schneider, C., Zima, E. (eds) Advances in Computer Algebra. WWCA 2016. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 226. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73232-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation