Abstract
We have seen that using a test for medical diagnosis requires that we distinguish two quite distinct sources of information: the characteristics of the test and the characteristics of the patient. Test characteristics are measured by likelihoods found by testing and experiment. Patient characteristics are found from data which describe the prevalence of a condition in the population and described as base rates. These are brought together in Bayes’ Rule
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Rescher N (1985) Pascal’s Wager: a study of practical reasoning in philosophical theology. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN
Schlaifer R (1959) Probability and statistics for business decisions: an introduction to managerial economics under uncertainty. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 19
Hacking I (1975) The emergence of probability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Finklestein MO, Levin B (1990) Statistics for lawyers. Springer, New York, p 93
Peters T (2001) Tom peters’ true confessions. Fast Company (December). https://www.fastcompany.com/44077/tom-peterss-true-confessions Accessed 21 Sept 2017
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185(4177):1124−1131
Kahneman D (2011) Thinking fast and slow. Allen Lane, London
Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (eds) (1982) Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, New York
Kynn M (2008) The ‘heuristics and biases’ bias in expert elicitation. J R Stat Soc Ser A 171(1):239–264
Garthwaite PH, Kadane JB, O’Hagan A (2005) Statistical methods for eliciting probability distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 100(470):680−701
O’Hagan A, Buck CE, Daneshkhah A, Eiser JR, Garthwaite PH, Jenkinson DJ, Oakley JE, Rakow T (2006) Uncertain judgements: eliciting expert’s probabilities. Wiley, Chichester
Bedford T, Cooke R (2001) Probabilistic risk analysis: foundations and methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Morgan MG, Henrion M (1990) Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gosling JP, Hart A, Mouat DC, Sabirovic M, Scanlan S, Simmons A (2012) Quantifying experts’ uncertainty about the future cost of exotic diseases. Risk Anal 32(5):881−893
O’Hagan A (1998) Eliciting expert beliefs in substantial applications. Statistician 47(1):21–35
MacDonald JA, Small MJ, Morgan MG (2008) Explosion probability of unexploded ordnance: expert beliefs. Risk Anal 28(4):825–841
Jaynes ET (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys Rev 106(4):620−630
Jaynes ET (2003) Probability theory: the logic of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Murphy AH, Winkler RL (1984) Probability forecasting in meteorology. J Am Stat Assoc 79(387):489−500
Budescu DV, Du N (2007) Coherence and consistency of investors’ probability judgements. Manag Sci 53(11):1731−1744
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jessop, A. (2018). Being Careful About Base Rates. In: Let the Evidence Speak. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71392-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71392-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71391-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71392-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)