Abstract
In this chapter, Simmons offers a critical engagement with William Franke’s A Philosophy of the Unsayable. Specifically focusing on Franke’s account of the current state of philosophy of religion, Simmons takes issue with the way in which Franke seems to ignore mainstream analytic approaches in his assessment. Moreover, Simmons highlights potential obstacles that a philosophy of the unsayable might face as concerns the status of such a discourse when considered as “philosophy.” Namely, it seems that being able to state clear theses and then offer argumentative evidence for them is crucial for philosophy. Yet such argumentative clarity seems to be what Franke’s proposal eschews. Simmons concludes by offering constructive suggestions for how Franke might overcome such problems by drawing on a broader set of philosophical resources.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simmons, J.A. (2017). Speaking About Silence (Sort of): When Does a Philosophy of the Unsayable Just Stop Being Philosophy?. In: Brown, N., Simmons, J. (eds) Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy . Palgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65900-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65900-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65899-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65900-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)