Abstract
Sustainability assessment is not an easy task especially in case of small and medium size remanufacturing companies. The remanufacturing process is characterized by high level of uncertainty regarding its timing, quality and quantity of its outputs. Our previous literature studies have showed that there is lack of a simple method for assessment of sustainability dedicated to SMEs in remanufacturing sector. The challenge is to combine the expert’s knowledge and the numerical data. The aim of this chapter is to present a mixed method for assessing the sustainability with the use of Grey Decision Making. The application of the Grey Decision Making (GDM) allows carrying out of the assessment process in a quantifiable way, even with uncertain and incomplete data. The proposed method aims to assess the class of the sustainability, to identify the weaknesses in current operations and then to facilitate making priorities for the improvements action which should to be taken in order to achieve a better sustainability class. The chapter presents also IT tools which was designed to facilitate the assessment process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akay D, Atak M (2007) Grey prediction with rolling mechanism for electricity demand forecasting of Turkey. Energy 32
Chen D, Thiede S, Schudeleit T, Herrmann C (2014) A holistic and rapid sustainability assessment tool for manufacturing SMEs. CIRP Ann Manufact Technol 63(1):437–440
Deng JL (1989) Introduction to grey system theory. J Grey Syst 1(1):1–24
Feng SC, Joung CB (2009) An overview of a proposed measurement infrastructure for sustainable manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 7th global conference on sustainable manufacturing, vol 355, p 360, Chennai, India
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2013) Sustainability reporting guidelines. http://www.385globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/G3.1Guidelinesncl-Technical Protocol.pdf. Accessed 04 386 Dec 2013
Golinska P, Kosacka M, Mierzwiak R, Werner-Lewandowska K (2015) Grey decision making as a tool for the classification of the sustainability level of remanufacturing companies. J Clean Prod 105:28–40
Golinska P, Kübler F (2014) The method for assessment of the sustainability maturity in remanufacturing companies. Proc CIRP 15:201–206
Hacking T, Guthrie P (2008) A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated and sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 28(2):73–89
Harris R (1998) Introduction to decision making, virtual salt. http://www.virtualsalt.com/crebook5.htm. Accessed 15 Dec 2014
Hanbin K (2014) Grey numbers in multiple criteria decision analysis and conflict resolution. PhD thesis available at www.uwspace.uwaterloo.cai/view.php?id=3641
Irmen A (2015) What is economic growth? Powerpoint presentation for SESI lecture on the 26th Oct 2015. Available from http://moodle.flshase.uni.lu/course/view.php?id=3641
Joung CB, Carrell J, Sarkar P, Feng SC (2012) Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing. Ecol Ind 24:148–157
Krajnc D, Glavic P (2005) A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development. Resour Conserv Recycl 43(2):189–208
Li GD, Yamaguchi D, Nagai M (2007) A grey-based decision-making approach to the supplier selection problem. Math Comput Model 46(3):573–581
Liu S, Lin Y, Forrest JYL (2010) Grey systems: theory and applications, vol 68. Springer Science & Business Media
Moldavska A, Welo T (2015) On the applicability of sustainability assessment tools in manufacturing. Proc CIRP 29:621–626
Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L (2007) Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ 60(3):498–508
Pope J, Annandale D, Morrison-Saunders A (2004) Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 24(6):595–616
Rosen MA, Kishawy HA (2012). Sustainable manufacturing and design: concepts, practices and needs. Sustainability 4(2):154–174
Sachs J (2015) The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press, New York
Schau E, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M (2012) Life cycle approach to sustainability assessment: a case study of remanufactured alternators. J Remanufact 2(1):1–14
Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2012) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Ind 15(2012):281–299
Singh S, Olugu EU, Fallahpour A (2014) Fuzzy-based sustainable manufacturing assessment model for SMEs. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16(5):847–860
Sundin E, Lee HM (2011) In what way is remanufacturing good for the environment? In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing (EcoDesign-11), 30 Nov–2 Dec, Kyoto, Japan, pp 551–556
Tepelmann T (2013) A holistic sustainability guide to support factory layout development (Diploma thesis). Technische Universitat Braunschweig
Thiede S, Posselt G, Herrmann C (2013) SME appropriate concept for continuously improving the energy and resource efficiency in manufacturing companies. CIRP J Manufact Sci Technol 6(3):204–211
United Nations (UN) (2007) Indicators for sustainable development. http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/guidelines.pdf. Accessed 06 Dec 2013)
Veleva V, Ellenbecker M (2001) Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology. J Clean Prod 9(6):519–49
Yang Y, John R (2012) Grey sets and greyness. Inform Sci 185(1):249–264
Wang T, Liou M, Hung H (2005) Application of grey theory on forecasting the exchange rate between TWD and USD. In: International conference on business and information, Academy of Taiwan Information System Research and Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, 14–15 July 2005
WCED (1987) World Commission on Environment and Development. Our common future. Oxford University Press
Zavadskas EK, Kaklauskas A, Turskis Z, Tamosaitiene J (2009) Multi-attribute decision-making model by applying grey numbers. Inform Lith Acad Sci 20(2):305–320
Acknowledgements
This chapter refers to the research financed by the Narodowe Centrum Badan i Rozwoju NCBiR (National Centre for Research and Development) in the framework of the German-Polish cooperation for sustainable development, project “Sustainability in remanufacturing operations (SIRO)”, grant no WPN/2/2012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Golinska-Dawson, P., Kosacka, M., Mierzwiak, R., Werner-Lewandowska, K. (2018). The Mixed Method for Sustainability Assessment of Remanufacturing Process Using Grey Decision Making. In: Golinska-Dawson, P., Kübler, F. (eds) Sustainability in Remanufacturing Operations. EcoProduction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60355-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60355-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60353-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60355-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)