Solidarity in European Migration Policy: The Perspective of the Visegrád States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Solidarity in the European Union
  • 1774 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter by Justyna Segeš Frelak sheds light on the reaction of Visegrád Group countries to the refugee crisis in the context of solidarity in EU migration policy. Currently, the Visegrád Group (V4) continues to be in strong opposition to compulsory refugee relocation under any scheme. At the same time, the V4 attitude towards migration fundamentally differs from that of several Western European countries. The chapter argues that this is partially connected to the fact that the V4 are among the states with the lowest percentages of foreigners in the European Union. As knowledge about immigration is limited and stereotypes are widespread, the refugee crisis has contributed to an increase in negative opinions about immigration. The anti-immigrant sentiment in the region is not based on real experience with non-nationals. In the case of the Visegrád countries, both populists and mainstream right- or left-wing parties have made use of fears over immigration for their political purposes. Furthermore, this has proven to be a very easy political tactic. Although, the engagement of civil society shows solidarity with refugees, these efforts are often overshadowed by an anti-immigration discourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Joint Statement of Heads of Governments of the V4 Countries published on September 16, 2016.

  2. 2.

    https://euobserver.com/migration/135960

  3. 3.

    Programme of the Polish Presidency of the Visegrád Group, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Warsaw 2016.

  4. 4.

    M. Kotzur, “Flexible Solidarity—Effective Solidarity?”, 17 December 2016, https://voelkerrechtsblog.org

  5. 5.

    Z. Vegh, “Flexible solidarity”, 19 December 2016, http://Visegradinsight.eu

  6. 6.

    http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/File:Non-national_population_by_group_of_citizenship,_1_January_2014_%28%C2%B9%29_YB15.png

  7. 7.

    Record number of over 1.2 million first-time asylum seekers registered in 2015, Eurostat44/2016–4 March 2016.

  8. 8.

    Asylum decisions in the EU, Eurostat, 75/2016–20 April 2016.

  9. 9.

    A. Kosowicz and A. Maciejko, “Integracja uchodźców w Polsce w liczbach (Refugee integration in Poland in numbers)”, Polskie Forum Migracyjne (Polish Migration Forum), Warsaw 2007.

  10. 10.

    http://www.unhcr-centraleurope.org/pdf/resources/statistics/asylum-trends-in-central-europe-2010-2012.html

  11. 11.

    http://www.mvcr.cz/migrace/clanek/mezinarodni-ochrany.aspx

  12. 12.

    UDSC, statistical data, 2016.

  13. 13.

    K. Wysieńska and Z. Karpiński, “Kapitał ludzki i społeczny uchodźców w Polsce—podsumowanie wyników badania” (Human and social capital of refugees in Poland—summary of results of research), Institute of Public Affairs, Warsaw 2012.

  14. 14.

    “Access to Employment for Beneficiaries of International Protection in Bulgaria, Poland, Romania and Slovakia”, UNHCR, Budapest 2013, V. Antolová, M. Martinkovič, Ľ. Kovács and D. Knošková, “Where is my home? Homelessness and Access to Housing among Asylum-Seekers, Refugees and Persons with International Protection in the Slovak Republic”, UNHCR, Bratislava 2013, K. Wysieńska, Gdzie jest mój dom? Bezdomność i dostęp do mieszkań wśród ubiegających się o status uchodźcy, uchodźców i osób z przyznaną ochroną międzynarodową w Polsce (Where is my home? Homelessness and access to housing among asylum seekers, refugees and persons granted international protection in Poland), IPA, UNHCR 2012.

  15. 15.

    http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/financing/fundings/map**-funds/countries/hungary/index_en.htm

  16. 16.

    http://www.migszol.com/integration-contract.html

  17. 17.

    J. Frelak, W. Klaus and J. Wiśniewski, (Eds.), Przystanek Polska. Analiza programów integracyjnych dla uchodźców (Next stop Poland. Analysis of refugee integration programmes), Warsaw: Institute of Public Affairs, Warsaw 2008.

  18. 18.

    M. Hlinčíková, M. Sekulová, Integrácia ľudí s medzinárodnou ochranou na Slovensku: Hľadanie východísk, IVO, Bratislava 2015.

  19. 19.

    http://www.mvcr.cz

  20. 20.

    B. Junyadi, C. Molnar, Central Europe’s Faceless Strangers: The Rise of Xenophobia, Political Capital Institute, Hungary 2016.

  21. 21.

    European Commission, Standard Eurobarometer 84, December 2015.

  22. 22.

    European Parliament: Parlemeter 2015. The main challenges for the EU: migration, and the economic and social situation.

  23. 23.

    CBOS, Stosunek do uchodźców w krajach Grupy Wyszehradzkiej (Attitudes to refugees in Visegrád Group countries), Warsaw, November 2015.

  24. 24.

    Stosunek Polaków do przyjmowania uchodźców, CBOS 2016.

  25. 25.

    https://www.aktuality.sk

  26. 26.

    Europeans Fear Wave of Refugees Will Mean More Terrorism, Fewer Jobs, Pew Research Centre, July 2016.

  27. 27.

    A. Jurečková, Refugees in the Czech Republic? Not a trace—but still a problem, https://www.boell.de

  28. 28.

    Visegrád and migration: Few prospects for a change in position, http://www.euractiv.com

  29. 29.

    Security More Important than Migrants’ Rights’, Spectator.sme.sk, 16 November 2016.

  30. 30.

    M. Hlinčíková, G. Mesežnikov (ed) Otvorená kra**a alebo nedobytná pevnosť? Slovensko, migranti a utečenci, IVO 2016.

  31. 31.

    A. Juhász, B. Hunyadi, E. Zgut, ‘Focus on Hungary: Refugees, Asylum and Migration’ (Political Capital, Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, December 2015), http://www.politicalcapital.hu/wp-content/uploads/pc_boll_hungary_refugees_asylum_and_migration_web.pd

  32. 32.

    B. Junyadi, C. Molnar, Central Europe’s Faceless Strangers: The Rise of Xenophobia, Political Capital Institute, Hungary 2016.

  33. 33.

    S. Schultheis, B. Hunyadi, The Referendum in Hungary: “A Clear Foreign Policy Debacle and a Temporary Domestic Setback for the Government”, 20 October 2016.

  34. 34.

    http://www.median.hu/object.c38fa2c9-5bc2-40c9-ae38-bab515a5f172.ivy

  35. 35.

    Nothing to Fear but Fear Itself? Case study—Poland/Institute of Public Affairs, 2017.

  36. 36.

    Kopacz: Przyjęcie uchodźców to nasz obowiązek, test na przyzwoitość (accepting refugees is our responsibility, a test of decency), Gazeta Wyborcza, 10 September 2015, http://wyborcza.pl/10,82983,18748772,kopacz-przyjecie-uchodzcow-to-nasz-obowiazek-test-na-przyzwoitosc.html.

  37. 37.

    Visegrád and migration: Few prospects for a change in position http://www.euractiv.com

  38. 38.

    D. Hall and A. Mikulska-Jolles, Uprzedzenia, Strach Czy Niewiedza? Młodzi Polacy o powodach niechęci do przyjmowania uchodźców (Prejudice, Fear or Ignorance? Young Poles on reasons for the reluctance to accept refugees), Warsaw, Stowarzyszenie Interwencji Prawnej (Association for Legal Intervention), 2016.

  39. 39.

    Ł. Bertram, M, Jędrzejek, Analiza Specjalna Obserwatorium Debaty Publicznej: Islamskie hordy, azjatycki najazd, socjalny dżihad. Jak polskie media piszą o uchodźcach (Special Analysis by the Public Debate Observatory: Islamic hordes, the Asian invasion, social jihad. How the Polish media write about refugees), “Kultura Liberalna”, 14 October 2015.

  40. 40.

    M. Tkaczyk, P. Pospěch, J. Macek. Analýza mediálního pokrytí uprchlické krize (výzkumná zpráva). Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2015.

  41. 41.

    B. Gábor and V. Messing, Infiltration of political meaning-production: security threat or humanitarian crisis? The coverage of the refugee ‘crisis’ in the Austrian and Hungarian media in early autumn 2015.

  42. 42.

    A. H. Chudžíková Obraz utečencov v médiách na Slovensku, in: M. Hlinčíková, G. Mesežnikov (ed) Otvorená kra**a alebo nedobytná pevnosť? Slovensko, migranti a utečenci, IVO 2016.

  43. 43.

    Milan Nič, Claire Sturm, Are Slovak and V4 societies ignorant and without any empathy for people esca** war?, 25 May 2016, http://Visegradinsight.eu

  44. 44.

    Anti-immigrant protest organisers seek to unite extremists, 23. Jun 2015 https://spectator.sme.sk/c/20058361/anti-immigrant-protest-organisers-seek-to-unite-extremists.html

  45. 45.

    Attila Juhász, Bulcsú Hunyadi, Edit Zgut, ‘Focus on Hungary: Refugees, Asylum and Migration’, Political Capital, Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, December 2015.

  46. 46.

    J. Segeš Frelak, Zuwanderer unerwünscht: die Flüchtlingsfrage spaltet die polnische Gesellschaft. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, November 2015.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justyna Segeš Frelak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frelak, J.S. (2017). Solidarity in European Migration Policy: The Perspective of the Visegrád States. In: Grimmel, A., Giang, S. (eds) Solidarity in the European Union. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57036-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation