Abstract
The chapter by Justyna Segeš Frelak sheds light on the reaction of Visegrád Group countries to the refugee crisis in the context of solidarity in EU migration policy. Currently, the Visegrád Group (V4) continues to be in strong opposition to compulsory refugee relocation under any scheme. At the same time, the V4 attitude towards migration fundamentally differs from that of several Western European countries. The chapter argues that this is partially connected to the fact that the V4 are among the states with the lowest percentages of foreigners in the European Union. As knowledge about immigration is limited and stereotypes are widespread, the refugee crisis has contributed to an increase in negative opinions about immigration. The anti-immigrant sentiment in the region is not based on real experience with non-nationals. In the case of the Visegrád countries, both populists and mainstream right- or left-wing parties have made use of fears over immigration for their political purposes. Furthermore, this has proven to be a very easy political tactic. Although, the engagement of civil society shows solidarity with refugees, these efforts are often overshadowed by an anti-immigration discourse.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Joint Statement of Heads of Governments of the V4 Countries published on September 16, 2016.
- 2.
- 3.
Programme of the Polish Presidency of the Visegrád Group, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Warsaw 2016.
- 4.
M. Kotzur, “Flexible Solidarity—Effective Solidarity?”, 17 December 2016, https://voelkerrechtsblog.org
- 5.
Z. Vegh, “Flexible solidarity”, 19 December 2016, http://Visegradinsight.eu
- 6.
- 7.
Record number of over 1.2 million first-time asylum seekers registered in 2015, Eurostat44/2016–4 March 2016.
- 8.
Asylum decisions in the EU, Eurostat, 75/2016–20 April 2016.
- 9.
A. Kosowicz and A. Maciejko, “Integracja uchodźców w Polsce w liczbach (Refugee integration in Poland in numbers)”, Polskie Forum Migracyjne (Polish Migration Forum), Warsaw 2007.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
UDSC, statistical data, 2016.
- 13.
K. Wysieńska and Z. Karpiński, “Kapitał ludzki i społeczny uchodźców w Polsce—podsumowanie wyników badania” (Human and social capital of refugees in Poland—summary of results of research), Institute of Public Affairs, Warsaw 2012.
- 14.
“Access to Employment for Beneficiaries of International Protection in Bulgaria, Poland, Romania and Slovakia”, UNHCR, Budapest 2013, V. Antolová, M. Martinkovič, Ľ. Kovács and D. Knošková, “Where is my home? Homelessness and Access to Housing among Asylum-Seekers, Refugees and Persons with International Protection in the Slovak Republic”, UNHCR, Bratislava 2013, K. Wysieńska, Gdzie jest mój dom? Bezdomność i dostęp do mieszkań wśród ubiegających się o status uchodźcy, uchodźców i osób z przyznaną ochroną międzynarodową w Polsce (Where is my home? Homelessness and access to housing among asylum seekers, refugees and persons granted international protection in Poland), IPA, UNHCR 2012.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.
J. Frelak, W. Klaus and J. Wiśniewski, (Eds.), Przystanek Polska. Analiza programów integracyjnych dla uchodźców (Next stop Poland. Analysis of refugee integration programmes), Warsaw: Institute of Public Affairs, Warsaw 2008.
- 18.
M. Hlinčíková, M. Sekulová, Integrácia ľudí s medzinárodnou ochranou na Slovensku: Hľadanie východísk, IVO, Bratislava 2015.
- 19.
- 20.
B. Junyadi, C. Molnar, Central Europe’s Faceless Strangers: The Rise of Xenophobia, Political Capital Institute, Hungary 2016.
- 21.
European Commission, Standard Eurobarometer 84, December 2015.
- 22.
European Parliament: Parlemeter 2015. The main challenges for the EU: migration, and the economic and social situation.
- 23.
CBOS, Stosunek do uchodźców w krajach Grupy Wyszehradzkiej (Attitudes to refugees in Visegrád Group countries), Warsaw, November 2015.
- 24.
Stosunek Polaków do przyjmowania uchodźców, CBOS 2016.
- 25.
- 26.
Europeans Fear Wave of Refugees Will Mean More Terrorism, Fewer Jobs, Pew Research Centre, July 2016.
- 27.
A. Jurečková, Refugees in the Czech Republic? Not a trace—but still a problem, https://www.boell.de
- 28.
Visegrád and migration: Few prospects for a change in position, http://www.euractiv.com
- 29.
Security More Important than Migrants’ Rights’, Spectator.sme.sk, 16 November 2016.
- 30.
M. Hlinčíková, G. Mesežnikov (ed) Otvorená kra**a alebo nedobytná pevnosť? Slovensko, migranti a utečenci, IVO 2016.
- 31.
A. Juhász, B. Hunyadi, E. Zgut, ‘Focus on Hungary: Refugees, Asylum and Migration’ (Political Capital, Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, December 2015), http://www.politicalcapital.hu/wp-content/uploads/pc_boll_hungary_refugees_asylum_and_migration_web.pd
- 32.
B. Junyadi, C. Molnar, Central Europe’s Faceless Strangers: The Rise of Xenophobia, Political Capital Institute, Hungary 2016.
- 33.
S. Schultheis, B. Hunyadi, The Referendum in Hungary: “A Clear Foreign Policy Debacle and a Temporary Domestic Setback for the Government”, 20 October 2016.
- 34.
- 35.
Nothing to Fear but Fear Itself? Case study—Poland/Institute of Public Affairs, 2017.
- 36.
Kopacz: Przyjęcie uchodźców to nasz obowiązek, test na przyzwoitość (accepting refugees is our responsibility, a test of decency), Gazeta Wyborcza, 10 September 2015, http://wyborcza.pl/10,82983,18748772,kopacz-przyjecie-uchodzcow-to-nasz-obowiazek-test-na-przyzwoitosc.html.
- 37.
Visegrád and migration: Few prospects for a change in position http://www.euractiv.com
- 38.
D. Hall and A. Mikulska-Jolles, Uprzedzenia, Strach Czy Niewiedza? Młodzi Polacy o powodach niechęci do przyjmowania uchodźców (Prejudice, Fear or Ignorance? Young Poles on reasons for the reluctance to accept refugees), Warsaw, Stowarzyszenie Interwencji Prawnej (Association for Legal Intervention), 2016.
- 39.
Ł. Bertram, M, Jędrzejek, Analiza Specjalna Obserwatorium Debaty Publicznej: Islamskie hordy, azjatycki najazd, socjalny dżihad. Jak polskie media piszą o uchodźcach (Special Analysis by the Public Debate Observatory: Islamic hordes, the Asian invasion, social jihad. How the Polish media write about refugees), “Kultura Liberalna”, 14 October 2015.
- 40.
M. Tkaczyk, P. Pospěch, J. Macek. Analýza mediálního pokrytí uprchlické krize (výzkumná zpráva). Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2015.
- 41.
B. Gábor and V. Messing, Infiltration of political meaning-production: security threat or humanitarian crisis? The coverage of the refugee ‘crisis’ in the Austrian and Hungarian media in early autumn 2015.
- 42.
A. H. Chudžíková Obraz utečencov v médiách na Slovensku, in: M. Hlinčíková, G. Mesežnikov (ed) Otvorená kra**a alebo nedobytná pevnosť? Slovensko, migranti a utečenci, IVO 2016.
- 43.
Milan Nič, Claire Sturm, Are Slovak and V4 societies ignorant and without any empathy for people esca** war?, 25 May 2016, http://Visegradinsight.eu
- 44.
Anti-immigrant protest organisers seek to unite extremists, 23. Jun 2015 https://spectator.sme.sk/c/20058361/anti-immigrant-protest-organisers-seek-to-unite-extremists.html
- 45.
Attila Juhász, Bulcsú Hunyadi, Edit Zgut, ‘Focus on Hungary: Refugees, Asylum and Migration’, Political Capital, Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, December 2015.
- 46.
J. Segeš Frelak, Zuwanderer unerwünscht: die Flüchtlingsfrage spaltet die polnische Gesellschaft. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, November 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frelak, J.S. (2017). Solidarity in European Migration Policy: The Perspective of the Visegrád States. In: Grimmel, A., Giang, S. (eds) Solidarity in the European Union. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57036-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57036-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57035-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57036-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)