Abstract
Ekström and Tolson focus on how the credibility of politicians and the professional norms of journalists are discursively negotiated in adversarial interviewing in election campaigns. The comparative analysis includes styles of interviewing in news and current affairs programs in the UK, Sweden, France, Greece and Italy. Conversation analysis is used to explore how journalists push the boundaries of impartiality in question formats, footings and sequences of questioning. Interviews in which politicians’ credibility was seriously challenged occurred in all countries. However significantly more aggressive and face-threatening questioning, than the typical accountability interviewing, occurred in three contexts: in forms of live interviewing performed by celebrity journalists; in specific program formats such as political talk shows; and in interviews with politicians whose views are positioned as deviant and outside the political mainstream.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, M (1984) Our Masters Voices. London: Methuen.
Bull, P (1998) Equivocation theory and news interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17: 36–51.
Bull P, Elliott J (1998) Level of threat; means of assessing interview toughness and neutrality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17: 220–244.
Bull P, Fetzer A (2010) Face, facework and political discourse. International Review of Social Psychology 23: 155–185.
Clayman S (2002) Tribune of the people: Maintaining the legitimacy of aggressive journalism. Media, Culture and Society, 24: 197–216.
Clayman S (2010) Address terms in the service of other actions: The case of news interview talk. Discourse and Communication, 4: 161–183.
Clayman S (2016) The micropolitics of legitimacy: Political positioning and journalistic scrutiny at the boundary of the mainstream. Forthcoming in Social Psychology Quarterly.
Clayman S, Heritage J (2002) The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clayman S, Romaniuk T (2011) Questioning Candidates. In: M Ekström, M Patrona (eds.) Talking Politics in Broadcast Media. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 15–32.
Coleman S (2011) (ed.) Leaders in the Living Room Oxford: Reuters Institute.
Drew P, Heritage J (1992) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ekström M (2009) Announced refusal to answer: A study of norms and accountability in broadcast political interviews. Discourse Studies, 11: 681–702.
Ekström M (2011) Politicians interviewed on television news. Discourse and Society 12: 563–584.
Ekström, M (2015) Political interviews. In: Tracy, K, Ilie, C, Sandel, T (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1175–1186.
Ekström M, Kroon Lundell A (2011) The joint construction of a journalistic expert identity in studio interactions between journalists on TV news. Text and Talk, 3: 1661–681.
Ekström M, Eriksson G (2013) Citizen participation in journalistic discourse: Multiplatform political interviews in the Swedish election campaign 2010. In: Ekström M, and Tolson A (eds) Media Talk and Political Elections in Europe and America Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 181–204.
Ekström, M, Djerf-Pierre, M, Johansson, B, Håkansson, N (2015) Negotiating politicians’ responsibilities in news interviews. Journalism Practice, 10: 983–1004.
Ekström, M, Fitzgerald (2014) Groundhog day: Extended repetitions in political news interviews. Journalism Studies, 15: 82–97.
Eriksson, G (2011) Adversarial moments: a study of short-form interviews in the news. Journalism - Theory, Practice & Criticism, 12: 51–69.
Fairclough, N (2000) New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge.
Goffman, E (1955) On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18: 213–231.
Goffman, E (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
Heritage J (1985) Analyzing news interviews: aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In: van Dijk T A (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol 3 New York: Academic Press. pp. 95–117.
Heritage J (2002a) Designing questions and setting agendas in the news interview. In: Glenn P, LeBaron C, Mandelbaum J (eds.) Studies in Language and Social Interaction Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heritage J (2002b) The limits of questioning: negative interrogatives and hostile question content, Journal of Pragmatics, 34: 1427–1446.
Higgins M (2010) The ‘public inquisitor’ as media celebrity. Cultural Politics, 6: 93–110.
Hutchby I (1996) Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hutchby I (2011a) Non-neutrality and argument in the hybrid political interview. Discourse Studies, 13: 349–365.
Hutchby I (2011b) Doing non-neutral: Belligerent interaction in the hybrid political Interview. In: Ekström M, Patrona M (eds.) Talking Politics in Broadcast Media. Amsterdam: John Benjamins page range.
Liebes T, Kampf Z, Blum-Kulka S (2008) Saddam on CBS and Arafat on IBA: Interviewing the enemy on television. Political Communication, 25: 311–329.
Montgomery M (2007) The Discourse of Broadcast News: A Linguistic Approach. London: Routledge.
Montgomery M (2011) The accountability interview, politics and change in UK public service broadcasting. In: Ekström M, Patrona M (eds.) Talking Politics in Broadcast Media. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 33–56.
Patrona M (2011) Neutralism revisited: When journalists set new rules in political news discourse. In: Ekström M, Patrona M (eds.) Talking Politics in Broadcast Media. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 157–176.
Patrona M (2012) Journalists on the news: the Structured Panel Discussion as a form of broadcast talk. Discourse & Society, 2012: 145–162.
Tolson A (2011) Political Discourse in TV News: Conversational presentation and the politics of ‘trust’. In: Ekström M, Patrona M (eds.) Talking Politics in Broadcast Media. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 57–74.
Tolson A (2013) The telegenic politician? Communication strategies in the UK 2010 party leader debates. In: Ekström, Tolson A (eds.) Media Talk and Political Elections in Europe and America. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 133–155.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ekström, M., Tolson, A. (2017). Political Interviews: Pushing the Boundaries of ‘Neutralism’. In: Ekström, M., Firmstone, J. (eds) The Mediated Politics of Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56629-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56629-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56628-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56629-0
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)