Abstract

The main purpose of this book is to elucidate what Hegel says and does in “The Doctrine of Being.” In the first section of Chapter 1, I explain why an adequate account of Hegel’s logic requires both a detailed and critical account. In the second section, I explain the sense in which Hegel regarded his speculative logic as a post-Kantian metaphysics . Such logic, Hegel claims, must be both presuppositionless and immanently self-develo**. The third section explores what Hegel meant by a presuppositionless, immanent logic (dialectic ), and why such logic must begin with pure being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adorno, Theodor W. 1973. Negative dialectics. Trans. E. B. Ashton. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, Theodor W. 1994. Hegel: Three studies. Trans. Shierry W. Nicholsen. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ameriks, Karl. 2000. Kant and the fate of autonomy: Problems in the appropriation of critical philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beiser, Frederick C. 1993. Introduction: Hegel and the problem of Metaphysics. In The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, ed. Frederick Beiser, 1–24. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Jonathan. 1974. Kant’s dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristow, William F. 2007. Hegel and the transformation of philosophical critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burbidge, John. 1981. On Hegel’s Logic: Fragments of a commentary. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbidge, John. 2006. The Logic of Hegel’s ‘Logic’: An introduction. Toronto: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbidge, John. 2007. The Relevance of Hegel’s Logic. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 3 (2–3): 211–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Clark. 1997. Hegel’s logic: Between dialectic and history. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, David G. 2007. A commentary to Hegel’s science of Logic. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feuerbach, Ludwig. 1983. Towards a critique of Hegelian philosophy. In The young Hegelians: An anthology, ed. Lawrence S. Stepelevich, 95–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichte, Johann G. 1988. “Concerning the difference between the Spirit and the Letter within Philosophy,” In Early philosophical writings. Translated and edited by Daniel Breazeale, 185–215. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichte, Johann G. 1994. “An attempt at a new presentation of the Wissenschaftslehre.” In Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre and other writings. Translated and edited by Daniel Breazeale, 1–118. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, John F. 1958. Hegel: A re-examination. New York: Collier Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, John F. 1973. Comments on Weil’s ‘The Hegelian Dialectic’. In The Legacy of Hegel, ed. J.J. O’Malley, et al. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, Michael. 1993. Hegel’s dialectical method. In The Cambridge companion to Hegel, ed. Frederick C. Beiser, 130–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1976. Hegel’s dialectic: Five hermeneutical studies. Trans. P. Christopher Smith. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovanni, George Di. 2010. “Introduction.” In The science of Logic, ed. Georg W. and F. Hegel, Trans. George di Giovanni, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, Paul. 1993. Thought and being: Hegel’s critique of Kant. In The Cambridge companion to Hegel, ed. Frederick C. Beiser, 171–210. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guzman, Luis. 2015. Relating Hegel’s science of Logic to contemporary philosophy: Themes and resonances. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Errol E. 1983. An interpretation of the Logic of Hegel. University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Henry S. 1993. Hegel’s intellectual development. In The Cambridge companion to Hegel, ed. Frederick Beiser, 25–51. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Klaus. 1976. Hegel: A non-metaphysical view. In Hegel: A collection of critical essays, ed. Alasdair MacIntyre, 101–124. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartnack, Justus. 1998. An introduction to Hegel’s Logic. Trans. Lars Aagaarg-Mogensen. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W. F. 1833. Wissenschaft der Logik. Erster Theil: Die Objektive Logik. In Erste Abtheilung: Die Lehre Vom Seyn, ed. Leopold Von Henning, Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W. F. 1896. Lectures on the history of philosophy, vol. 3. Trans. Elizabeth S. Haldane. London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W. F. 1929. Hegel’s Science of Logic, vol. 1. Trans. W. H. Johnston and L. G. Struthers. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W. F. 1969. Hegel’s science of Logic. Trans. Arnold V. Miller. Amherst: Humanity Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W. F. 1969. Wissenschaft der Logik I. Erster Teil: Die Objektive Logik. Erstes Buch, In ed. Eva Moldenhauer und Karl M. Michel, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W. F. 1970. Philosophy of nature, being part two of the encyclopaedia of the philosophical sciences. Trans. Ardold V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W. F. 1977. The difference between Fichte’s and Schelling’s system of philosophy. Trans. Henry S. Harris and Walter Cerf. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W. F. 1991. Elements of the philosophy of right. Trans. Hugh B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W. F. 1991. The encyclopaedia Logic: Part I of the encyclopaedia of philosophical sciences with the Zusätze. Trans. T. F Geraets et al. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W. F. 2003. The phenomenology of mind. Trans. James B. Baillie. Mineola: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W. F. 2010. The science of Logic. Trans. George di Giovanni Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, Dieter. 2003. Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölderlin, Friedrich. 1986. Judgment and being. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 11 (1): 17–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houlgate, Stephen. 2005. An introduction to Hegel: Freedom, truth and history. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlgate, Stephen. 2006. The Opening of Hegel’s Logic: From being to infinity. Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyppolite, Jean. 1997. Logic and existence. Trans. Leonard Lawlor and Amit Sen. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inwood, Michael. 1983. Hegel. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of pure reason. Trans. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 2004. Prolegomena to any future metaphysics section. Trans. Gary Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, Søren. 2009. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs, ed. Alastair Hannay. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojève, Alexandre. 1969. Introduction to the reading of hegel: lectures on the phenomenology of spirit. Trans. James H. Nichols, Jr. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauer, S.J. Quentin. 1977. Essays in Hegelian dialectic. New York: Fordham University Press, 114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longuenesse, Beatrice. 2007. Hegel’s critique of metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maker, William. 1994. Philosophy without foundations: Rethinking Hegel. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, Herbert. 1960. Reason and revolution: Hegel and the rise of social theory. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCumber, John. 2014. Hegel’s mature critique of Kant. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, John. 1896. Studies in the Hegelian dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, John. 1910. A Commentary on Hegel’s Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mure, Geoffrey R. G. 1950. A Study of Hegel’s Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, Herbert. J. 1936. Kant’s metaphysic of experience. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkard, Terry. 1988. Hegel’s Dialectic: The explanation of possibility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pippin, Robert B. 1989. Hegel’s idealism: The satisfactions of self-consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl. 1962. The open society and its enemies, In The high tide of prophecy: Hegel, Marx, and the aftermath, vol. 2, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Michael. 1982. Hegel’s Dialectic and its criticism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Stanley The. 2014. Idea of Hegel’s science of Logic. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1961. History of Western Philosophy. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Friedrich W. J. von. 1994. On the history of modern philosophy. Trans. Andrew Bowie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Friedrich. 2007. The grounding of positive philosophy: The Berlin lectures. Trans. Bruce Matthews. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, Sally. 2012. Hegel’s critique of Kant: From dichotomy to identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Norman K. 1992. Commentary to Kant’s critique of pure reason. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1977. Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trendelenburg, Friedrich A. 1871. The logical question in Hegel’s system. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 5 (4): 349–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, Robert M. 2005. Hegel’s philosophy of reality, freedom, and god. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winfield, Richard D. 1988. Reason and justice. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfield, Richard D. 2012. Hegel’s science of Logic: a critical rethinking in thirty lectures. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Allen W. 1992. “Reply.” Bulletin of the Hegelian society of Great Britain 25: 34–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Tabak .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tabak, M. (2017). Introduction. In: The Doctrine of Being in Hegel’s Science of Logic. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55938-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation