Rodentia Navigation

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Synonyms

Acquisition of knowledge about spatial location; Spatial learning

Definition

Rodentia navigation refers to how rodents find their way about (i.e., to find food or water, or to return home), to the many strategies and mechanisms underlying spatially guided behavior. Rodents have a varied range of strategies, some innate and others learned, that help them to navigate, and when faced with a specific spatial task, the one they choose will depend both on their sensorial capacities and on the nature of the stimuli that are available (for reviews see Rodrigo 2002; Tommasi et al. 2012).

Background

Rodents can use different navigational strategies to locate a goal. Moreover, they can use a given strategy in a specific situation and under different conditions, use another one. The ability to find their way round their world is seen as of critical adaptive significance. Rodents can navigate using information based on conspecifics (social influences), on their own movement (i.e., dead...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bisbing, T., Sayde, J. M., Saxon, M., & Brown, M. F. (2015). Factors modulating social influence on spatial choice in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 41, 286–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. F. (2011). Social influences on rat spatial choice. Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews, 6, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamizo, V. D. (2003). Acquisition of knowledge about spatial location: Assessing the generality of the mechanism of learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, K. (1986). A purely geometric module in the rat’s spatial representation. Cognition, 23(2), 149–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, K., & Spetch, M. L. (1998). Mechanisms of landmark use in mamals and birds. In S. Healy (Ed.), Spatial representation in animals (pp. 1–17). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, A., Stürzl, W. S., Zeil, J., & Cheng, K. (2008). The information content of panoramic images II: View-based navigation in nonrectangular experimental arenas. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 15–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collett, T. S., Cartwright, B. A., & Smith, B. A. (1986). Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 158A, 835–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doeller, C. F., & Burgess, N. (2008). Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 5909–5914.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Galef, B. G., Jr. (1988). Communication of information concerning distant diets in a social, central-place foraging species (Rattus norvegicus). In T. R. Zentall & B. G. Galef Jr. (Eds.), Social learning: Psychological and biological perspectives (pp. 119–140). Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilroy, K. E., & Pearce, J. M. (2014). The role of local, distal, and global information in latent spatial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40, 212–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, C. M., & Cook, R. G. (1997). Landmark geometry and identity controls spatial navigation in rats. Animal Learning and Behavior, 25, 312–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosaki, Y., Austen, J. M., & McGregor, A. (2013). Overshadowing of geometry learning by discrete landmarks in the water maze: Effects of relative salience and relative validity of competing cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behaviour Processes, 39, 126–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leising, K. J., & Blaisdell, A. P. (2009). Associative basis of landmark learning and integration in vertebrates. Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews, 4, 80–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh, N. J. (1983). Conditioning and associative learning. Oxford: Claredon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh, N. J. (2002). Do not ask whether they have a cognitive map, but how they find their way about. Psicológica, 23, 165–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesa, V., Osorio, A., Ballesta, S., Marimon, J. M., & Chamizo, V. D. (2017). Geometric vs. non-geometric information: Explaining male rats’ selective preferences in a navigation task. Learning and Motivation, 60, 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. Y., & Shettleworth, S. J. (2007). Learning about environmental geometry: An associative model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 191–212.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, H., & Mittelstaedt, M.-L. (1982). Homing by path integration. In F. Papi & H. G. Wallraff (Eds.), Avian navigation (pp. 290–297). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. G. M. (1981). Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues. Learning and Motivation, 12, 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Claredon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. M. (2009). An associative analysis of spatial learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1665–1684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, W. A., Cruz, C., & Tremblay, J. (2007). Rats take correct novel routes and shortcuts in an enclosed maze. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33(2), 79–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigo, T. (2002). Navigational strategies and models. Psicológica, 23, 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, C. A., Torres, A. A., Mackintosh, N. J., & Chamizo, V. D. (2010). Sex differences in the strategies used by rats to solve a navigation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 36, 395–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, C. A., Chamizo, V. D., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2011). Overshadowing and blocking between landmark learning and shape learning: The importance of sex differences. Learning & Behavior, 39, 324–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tommasi, L., Chiandetti, C., Pecchia, T., Sovrano, V. A., & Vallortigara, G. (2012). From natural geometry to spatial cognition. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 799–824.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. L., Barnett, A. M., & Meck, W. H. (1990). Organizational effects of early gonadal secretions on sexual differentiation in spatial memory. Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 84–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victoria D. Chamizo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Chamizo, V.D., Rodrigo, T. (2022). Rodentia Navigation. In: Vonk, J., Shackelford, T.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55065-7_804

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation