Abstract
In this chapter, the multiobjective optimization design procedure will be used to tune the autopilot controllers for an autonomous Kadett\(\copyright \) aircraft. For this aim, a multivariable PI controller is defined, and a many-objectives optimization instance is tackled using designer preferences. After the multicriteria decision making stage, the selected controller is implemented and evaluated in a real flight test.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Tail rudder control is obtained as a ratio control from ailerons control: \(u_{RU}=0.25u_A\).
- 3.
Lithium polymer battery.
- 4.
References
CSS (2012) Unmanned aerial vehicle. Special issue. IEEE Control Syst Mag 32(5)
Du J, Zhang Y, Lü T (2008) Unmanned helicopter flight controller design by use of model predictive control. WSEAS Trans Syst 7(2):81–87
Fregene K (2012) Unmanned aerial vehicles and control: lockheed martin advanced technology laboratories. IEEE Control Syst 32(5):32–34
Kadmiry B, Driankov D (2004) A fuzzy flight controller combining linguistic and model-based fuzzy control. Fuzzy Sets Syst 146(3):313–347
Klein V, Morelli EA (2006) Aircraft system identification: theory and practice. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Reston, Va, USA
Pounds PE, Bersak DR, Dollar AM (2012) Stability of small-scale uav helicopters and quadrotors with added payload mass under PID control. Auton Robots 33(1–2):129–142
Reynoso-Meza G, Sanchis J, Blasco X, Freire RZ (2016) Evolutionary multi-objective optimisation with preferences for multivariable PI controller tuning. Expert Syst Appl 51:120–133
Song P, Qi G, Li K (2009) The flight control system based on multivariable PID neural network for small-scale unmanned helicopter. In: International conference on information technology and computer science, 2009. ITCS 2009, vol 1, IEEE, pp 538–541
Velasco J, Garcia-Nieto S, Simarro R, Sanchis J (2015) Control strategies for unmanned aerial vehicles under parametric uncertainty and disturbances: a comparative study. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(9), 1–6. 1st IFAC workshop on advanced control and navigation for autonomous aerospace vehicles ACNAAV15Seville, Spain 10–12 June 2015
Velasco Carrau J, Garcia-Nieto S (2014) Unmanned aerial vehicles model identification using multi-objective optimization techniques. In: World Congress (2014), vol 19, pp 8837–8842
Velasco-Carrau J, García-Nieto S, Salcedo J, Bishop R (2015) Multi-objective optimization for wind estimation and aircraft model identification. J Guid Control Dyn 1–18
Wang J, Hovakimyan N, Cao C (2010) Verifiable adaptive flight control: unmanned combat aerial vehicle and aerial refueling. J Guid Control Dyn 33(1):75–87
Wargo CA, Church GC, Glaneueski J, Strout M (2014) Unmanned aircraft systems (uas) research and future analysis. In: IEEE aerospace conference, 2014. IEEE, pp 1–16
Zarei J, Montazeri A, Motlagh MRJ, Poshtan J (2007) Design and comparison of lqg/ltr and h-inf controllers for a vstol flight control system. J. Franklin Inst. 344(5):577–594
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reynoso Meza, G., Blasco Ferragud, X., Sanchis Saez, J., Herrero Durá, J.M. (2017). Multiobjective Optimization Design Procedure for an Aircraft’s Flight Control System. In: Controller Tuning with Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 85. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41301-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41301-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41299-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41301-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)