Abstract
Shoreline morphodynamics refers to the counting the interaction, interface and adjustment of the seafloor topography and fluid hydrodynamic processes, seafloor morphologies and sequences of change dynamics involving the motion of sediment transports. Hydrodynamic processes include those of waves, tides and wind-induced currents. The present study involves an endeavour to appraise the transect wise investigative model for predicting the future shoreline position in order to monitor the shoreline shift along the coast in Balasore district of Orissa, India. The present study regarding the shoreline shift has been analysed in two ways such as short term and long term shoreline position analysis through Linear Regression (LR) model and End Point Rate (EPR) model respectively on the basis of these model generated shoreline dynamics nature, the future shoreline position has also been predicted. The model error or positional shift at each sample points (Transects) is observed. The positional error varies from −4.82 to 212.41 m. It has been found that model prediction error is higher in the mouth of river Subarnarekha. The overall error for the entire predicted shoreline was found to be 41.88 m by Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). In addition, further it was tested by means difference between actual and predicted shoreline positions using ‘t’ test and it has been found that predicted shore line is not significantly different from actual shoreline position at (t132 = 0.278, p < 0.005). The obtained results of the present study suggest that the utilization of remote sensing data in addition with the GIS technology and statistical technique are very appropriate for extraction of shoreline and its shifting calculation. The magnitude of erosion is higher in the northern part of the coastline in the left bank area of Subarnarekha river estuary and also in the estuarine part of river Dugdugi and Burahbalang which is seen from the imagery of 1972 to 2010 and the model predicted shoreline also depicts the same. The southern part of the shoreline near Rasalpur, Joydevkasba is considerably stable indicated by the same model. The cross validation (The estimated shoreline was compared with the actual shoreline delineated from satellite imagery of 2013) shows that the model can predict consistent guesstimate of the shoreline position with satisfactory accuracy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Basco, (1991). Boundary conditions and long term shoreline change rates for the Southern Virginia ocean coastline. Shore and Beach, 59, 8–13.
Bertacchini, E., & Capra, A. (2010). Map updating and coastline control with very high resolution satellite images: application to Molise and Puglia coasts (Italy). Italian Journal of Remote Sensing, 42, 103–115. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5721/ItJRS20104228.
Dolan, Fenster, & Holmes, (1991). Temporal analysis of shoreline recession and accretion. Journal of Coastal Research, 7, 723–744.
Douglas, & Crowell, (2000). Long-term shoreline position prediction and error propagation. Journal of Coastal Research, 16, 145–152.
Fenster, Dolan, & Elder, (1993). A new method for predicting shoreline positions from historical data. Journal of Coastal Research, 9, 147–171.
Himmelstoss, E. A. (2009). DSAS 4.0—Installation instructions and user guide. In E. R. Thieler, E. A. Himmelstoss, J. L. Zichichi, Ergul, & Ayhan, (Eds.), The digital shoreline analysis system (DSAS) version 4.0—An ArcGIS extension for calculating shoreline change: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1278, ver. 4.2. p. 81 Accessed April 4 2013. at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1278/.
Lee, J., & Jurkevich, I. (1990). Coastline detection and tracing in SAR images. IEEE Transactions in Geosciences and Remote Sensing, 28, 662–668. doi:10.1109/TGRS.1990.572976.
Maiti, S., & Bhattacharya, A. (2009). Shoreline change analysis and its application to prediction: A remote sensing and statistics based approach. Marine Geology, 257, 11–23. doi:10.1016/j.margeo.2008.10.006.
Paine, & Morton, (1989). Shoreline and vegetation line movement, Texas Gulf coast 1974 to 1982. The University of Texas at Austin. Bureau of Economic and Geology and Geological Circular, 89(1), 50.
Rissanen, J. (1978). Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica, 14, 465–471. doi:10.1016/0005-1098(78)90005-5.
Siddiqui, M., & Maajid, S. (2004). Monitoring of geomorphological changes for planning reclamation work in coastal area of Karachi, Pakistan. Advances in Space Research, 33, 1200–1205. doi:10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00373-9.
Thieler, O’Connell, & Schupp. (2001). The Massachusetts shoreline change project—1800s to 1994. US GS Administrative Report to the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Managemen. Boston, MA, p. 26 + Appendices.
White, K., & El Asmar, H. (1999). Monitoring changing position of coastlines using Thematic Mapper imagery, an example from the Nile Delta. Geomorphology, 29, 93–105. doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00008-2.
Wright, & Pilkey, Jr. (1989). The effect of hard stabilization upon dry beach width. Proceedings of Coastal Zone ’89. American Society of Civil Engineers. pp. 676–790.
Wright, & Thorm, (1977). Coastal Depositional Landforms: a morphodynamic approach. Progress in Physical Geography, 1(3), 412–459.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barman, N.K., Chatterjee, S., Paul, A.K. (2016). Shoreline Dynamics in Subarnarekha Delta Plain. In: Coastal Morphodynamics. SpringerBriefs in Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33575-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33575-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33574-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33575-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)