Abstract
Trust scholars emphasize the importance of trust research given that trust is integral to societal functioning. However, evidence suggests there is a “dark side” to trust. We discuss a specific facet of the dark side of individuals’ trust in institutions, which we call compensatory institutional trust. We review theory and evidence suggesting that individuals’ trust in institutions can be generated in order to satisfy psychological needs. Specifically, when experiencing threats to safety, security, or a sense of meaning and understanding, individuals will sometimes trust institutions more than otherwise. A motivated increase in the perception that institutions are trustworthy may palliate existential and epistemic threats. We detail theoretical perspectives that speak to compensatory institutional trust, namely, terror management theory, theory on system-justifying beliefs, compensatory control theory, and the meaning maintenance model. We emphasize these perspectives’ relations to compensatory institutional trust by reviewing illustrative empirical examples of compensatory institutional trust-relevant processes. Altogether, we aim to illuminate the utility of the compensatory institutional trust framework in shedding light on psychological processes that may underlie findings in the trust literature. Ultimately, we make a call to trust researchers to not neglect addressing this dark side of institutional trust in their scholarship.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
We remain agnostic with regard to theoretical differentiation between trust in institutions and trust in the individuals within institutions because that is not within the scope of this chapter. For further discussion of this issue, see Campos-Castillo et al. (2016) as well as Herian and Neal (2016).
References
Altemeyer, R. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bilsky, W., & Schwarz, S. H. (1994). Values and personality. European Journal of Personality, 8, 163–181.
Burger, J. M. (1989). Negative reactions to increases in perceived person control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 246–256.
Burke, B. L., Kosloff, S., & Landau, M. J. (2013). Death goes to the polls: A meta-analysis of morality salience effects on political attitudes. Political Psychology, 34, 183–200.
Campos-Castillo, C., Woodson, B. W., Theiss-Morse, E., Sacks, T., Fleig-Palmer, M. M., & Peek, M. E. (2016). Examining the relationship between interpersonal and institutional trust in political and health care contexts. In E. Shockley, T. M. S. Neal, L. M. PytlikZillig, & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on trust: Towards theoretical and methodological integration. New York: Springer.
Cole, L. M., & Cohn, E. S. (2016). Institutional trust across cultures: Its definitions, conceptualizations, and antecedents across Eastern and Western European Nations. In E. Shockley, T. M. S. Neal, L. M. PytlikZillig, & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on trust: Towards theoretical and methodological integration. New York: Springer.
Fibert, Z., & Ressler, W. H. (1998). Intolerance of ambiguity and political orientation among Israeli university students. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 33–40.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: Social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., et al. (1990). Evidence for terror management II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 308–318.
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 189–212). New York: Springer.
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Arndt, J. (2008). A basic but uniquely human motivation: Terror management. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 114–134). New York: Guilford.
Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 88–110.
Herian, M. N., & Neal, T. M. S. (2016). Trust as a multilevel phenomenon across contexts: Implications for improved interdisciplinarity in trust research. In E. Shockley, T. M. S. Neal, L. M. PytlikZillig, & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on trust: Towards theoretical and methodological integration. New York: Springer.
Ji, L. J., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 943–955.
Jonas, E., & Fischer, P. (2006). Terror management and religion: Evidence that intrinsic religiousness mitigates worldview defense following morality salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 553.
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereoty** in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.
Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–920.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126–136.
Jost, J. T., & van der Toorn, J. (2012). System justification theory. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 313–343). London: Sage.
Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Napier, J. L., Callan, M. J., & Laurin, K. (2008). God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 18–35.
Kay, A. C., Whitson, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Compensatory control: Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 264–268.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivation bases. New York: Plenum.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
Landau, M. J., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., et al. (2004). Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1136–1150.
Laurin, K., Shepherd, S., & Kay, A. C. (2010). Restricted emigration, system inescapability and defense of the status quo: System-justifying consequences of restricted exit opportunities. Psychological Science, 21, 1075–1082.
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
Muñoz, J., Torcal, M., & Bonet, E. (2011). Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European Union: Congruence or compensation? European Union Politics, 12, 551–574.
Neal, T. M. S., Shockley, E., & Schilke, O. (2016). The “dark side” of institutional trust. In E. Shockley, T. M. S. Neal, L. M. PytlikZillig, & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on trust: Towards theoretical and methodological integration. New York: Springer.
Newton, K. (2001). Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review, 22, 201–214.
Pepitone, A., & Saffiotti, L. (1997). The selectivity of nonmaterial beliefs in interpreting life events. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 23–35.
Proulx, T. (2012). Threat-compensation in social psychology: Is there a core motivation? Social Cognition, 30, 643–651.
Proulx, T., & Heine, S. J. (2008). The case of transmogrifying experimenter: Affirmation of moral schema following implicit change detection. Psychological Science, 19, 1294–1300.
Proulx, T., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). The five “A”s of meaning maintenance: Finding meaning of the theories of sense-making. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 317–335.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.
Rutjens, B. T., van Harreveld, F., & van der Pligt, J. (2010). Yes we can: Belief in progress as compensatory control. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 246–252.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.
Shepherd, S., & Kay, S. C. (2012). On the perpetuation of ignorance: System dependence, system justification, and the motivated avoidance of socio-political information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 264–280.
Shepherd, S., Kay, S. C., Landau, M. J., & Keefer, L. A. (2011). Evidence for the specificity of control motivations in worldview defense: Distinguishing compensatory control from uncertainty management and terror management processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 949–958.
Shockley, E., & Fairdosi, A. S. (2015). Power to the people? Psychological mechanisms of disengagement from direct democracy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 579–586. doi:10.1177/1948550614568159.
Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991). A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 93–159.
Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2004). The cultural animal: Twenty years of terror management theory and research. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 13–34). New York: Guilford.
Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261–302). New York: Academic Press.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115–191). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
van der Toorn, J., Tyler, T. R., & Jost, J. T. (2011). More than fair: Outcome dependence, system justification, and the perceived legitimacy of authority figures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 127–138.
Warren, M. E. (1999). Democracy and trust. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049–1062.
Weisz, J. R., Rothbaum, F. M., & Blackburn, T. C. (1984). Standing out and standing in: The psychology of control in America and Japan. American Psychologist, 39, 955–969.
Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322, 115–117.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shockley, E., Shepherd, S. (2016). Compensatory Institutional Trust: A “Dark Side” of Trust. In: Shockley, E., Neal, T., PytlikZillig, L., Bornstein, B. (eds) Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22261-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22261-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22260-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22261-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)