Mental Faculties in Early Modern Philosophy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences
  • 151 Accesses

Synonyms

Cognitive faculties; Cognitive/mental capacities; Cognitive/mental powers

Introduction

Mental or cognitive faculties (such as the senses, imagination, memory, understanding (or intellect), and will) played a major role in (late) Aristotelian and Renaissance Platonic thought before early modern philosophers began to reconsider the traditional views of the metaphysical structure of the world and our epistemological access to it. Early modern philosophers were often highly critical, and even polemical, toward their predecessors’ metaphysical and epistemological outlook in general and their views of faculties in particular. Despite this, however, virtually all of them talked about mental faculties (in one way or another), and many of them even structured their theories of cognition and epistemology around the discussion of our faculties. At the same time, early modern authors from René Descartes to Thomas Reid held surprisingly diverse views as to what faculties really are, how...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnauld P, Nicole J (1662) Logic or the art of thinking (ed and trans: Buroker JV). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon F (1620) The new Organon. In: Jardine L, Silverthrone M (ed). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker P (2018) The soul and its parts: debates about the powers of the soul. In: Schmid S (ed) Philosophy of mind in the late middle ages and renaissance. Routledge, London/New York, pp 63–82

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berkeley G (1710) Principles of human knowledge. In: Robinson H (ed) Principles of human knowledge and three dialogues. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes R (1620) Rules for the direction of the mind. In: Descartes 1984, vol 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes R (1633) Treatise on man. In: The world and other writings (ed and trans: Gaukroger S), ibid. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes R (1637) Discourse on method. In: Descartes 1984, vol 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes R (1641) Meditations on first philosophy. In: Descartes 1984, vol 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes R (1983–1991) Oeuvres de Descartes. In: Adam Ch, Tannery P (ed). Vrin [= AT], Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes R (1984) Philosophical writings of Descartes, 2 vols (ed and trans: Cottingham J, Stoothoff R, Murdoch D). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaukroger S (1989) Cartesian logic: an essay on Descartes’s conception of inference. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg S (2008) ‘Things that undermine each other’: occasionalism, freedom, and attention in Malebranche. In: Garber D, Nadler S (eds) Oxford studies in early modern philosophy, vol 4. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 113–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg S (2015) Occasionalism, human freedom, and consent in Malebranche. In: Garber D, Rutherford D (eds) Oxford studies in early modern philosophy, vol 7. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 150–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield G (2008) The cognitive faculties. In: Garber D, Ayers M (eds) The Cambridge history of seventeenth-century philosophy, vol II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 953–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes T (1640) The elements of law natural and politic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1928

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes T (1651) Leviathan. In: Tuck R (ed). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes T (1655) De corpore. In: Molesworth W (ed) The English works of Thomas Hobbes, vol 1. John Bohn, London. 1839

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume D (1739) A treatise of human nature. In: Norton D, Norton M (ed). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume D (1748) An enquiry concerning human understanding. In: Beauchamp T (ed). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison K (1991) Dormitive virtues, scholastic qualities, and the new philosophies. Hist Sci 29:245–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz GW (1705) New essays concerning human understanding (ed and trans: Remnant P, Bennett J). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke J (1689) An essay concerning human understanding. In: Nidditch P (ed). Clarendon, Oxford, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Malebranche N (1674/75) The search after truth [including the elucidations] (ed and trans: Lennon Th, Olscamp P). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Malebranche N (1688) Dialogues on metaphysics and on religion. In: Jolley N (ed), trans: Scott D. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Malherbe M (1996) Bacon’s method of science. In: Peltonen M (ed) The Cambridge companion to Bacon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 75–98

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols R (2007) Thomas Reid’s theory of perception. Clarendon, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perler D (2013) What are faculties of the soul? Descartes and his scholastic background. In: Marenbon J (ed) Continuity and innovation in medieval and modern philosophy. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 9–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Perler D (2015) Faculties in medieval philosophy. In: Perler D (ed) The faculties: a history. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, pp 97–139

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit P (2008) Made with words. Hobbes on language, mind, and politics. Princeton University Press, Princeton/Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid T (1785) Essays on the intellectual powers of man. In: Brookes D (ed). Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid T (1788) Essays on the active powers of man. In: Haakonssen K, Harris J (eds). Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid S (2015) Faculties in early modern philosophy. In: Perler D (ed) The faculties: a history. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, pp 150–197

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman P (2004) Ideas, mental faculties, and method: the logic of ideas of Descartes and Locke and its reception in the Dutch Republic 1630–1750. Brill, Leiden et al

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sgarbi M (2018) Renaissance facultative logic and the workings of the mind: the ‘cognitive turn’. In: Schmid S (ed) Philosophy of mind in the late middle ages and renaissance. Routledge, London/New York, pp 270–290

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza B (1677) Ethics demonstrated in geometrical order. In: The collected works of Spinoza, vol 1 (ed and trans: Curley E). Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1985

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan Schmid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Schmid, S. (2020). Mental Faculties in Early Modern Philosophy. In: Jalobeanu, D., Wolfe, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_225-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_225-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20791-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20791-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation