HEMIS Project (Electrical Powertrain HEalth Monitoring for Increased Safety of FEVs): Limitations of Electromagnetic Standards for Vehicles Equipped with Electrical Powertrain

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electric Vehicle Systems Architecture and Standardization Needs

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mobility ((LNMOB))

Abstract

The HEMIS project is concerned with health monitoring of electrical powertrain in order to enhance the maintainability and safety of electric vehicles. Electromagnetic emissions from electrical powertrain will change the electromagnetic environment in vehicles, which may have implications for electromagnetic compatibility and, because of the high electrical power levels, human exposure to electromagnetic fields. This paper outlines some of the electromagnetic issues under investigation in the project, including limitations of existing test methods for electromagnetic compatibility, and a lack of test methods for the assessment of in-vehicle human exposure, as well as for both electromagnetic compatibility and human field exposure issues relating to wireless charging of traction batteries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Accenture (2011) Plug-in electric vehicles. Changing perceptions, hedging bets. Accenture end-consumer survey on the electrification of private transport

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sedano B, Ruddle AR, Unanue I, Low L, Astigarraga D, Ibarra I, Cerro I, Galarza A (2013) HEMIS: electrical powertrain health monitoring for increased safety of FEVs. Chem Eng Trans 33:781–786

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ruddle AR, Armstrong R (2013) Review of current EMC standards in relation to vehicles with Electric powertrains. In: Proceedings of the 12th international European EMC symposium Bruges, Belgium, pp 298–303, Sept 2013

    Google Scholar 

  4. Directive 2004/104/EC of 14 October 2004 adapting to technical progress Council Directive 72/245/EEC relating to the radio interference (electromagnetic compatibility) of vehicles and amending Directive 70/156/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type-approval of motor vehicles and their trailers. Off J EU, No L 337, pp 13–58, 13 Nov 2004

    Google Scholar 

  5. UNECE (2012) Regulation No. 10—Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to electromagnetic compatibility, Add 9, Rev 4, 6 March 2012

    Google Scholar 

  6. Commission Regulation (EC) No. 661/2009 of 13 July 2009 concerning type-approval requirements for the general safety of motor vehicles, their trailers and systems, components and separate technical units intended therefor”, Off J EU, No L 200, pp 1–24, 31 July 2009

    Google Scholar 

  7. ISO 11452 Component test methods for electrical disturbances in road vehicles, 11 parts

    Google Scholar 

  8. CISPR 25:2002+C1:2004 Limits and methods of measurement of radio disturbance characteristics for the protection of receivers used on board vehicles, 2nd edn. Corrigendum 1, March 2004

    Google Scholar 

  9. Janssen V (2011) RFI emission measurements: current status on CISPR standards. www.schurter.com/en/Documents-References/Downloads-Document-Request. Accessed 14 Feb 2011

  10. ISO 11451 Road vehicles—Vehicle test methods for electrical disturbances from narrowband radiated electromagnetic energy, 4 parts

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schmid G, Überbacher R, Göth P (2009) ELF and LF magnetic field exposure in hybrid- and electric cars. In: Proceedings on bio-electromagnetics conference 2009, Davos, Switzerland, Paper 9, 3 June 2009

    Google Scholar 

  12. CISPR 12:2001+A1:2005 (2005) Vehicles, motorboats and spark-ignited engine driven devices. Radio disturbances characteristics. Limits and methods of measurements, 5th edn. Amendment 1, 24 Feb 2005

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ruddle AR, Topham DA, Ward DD, Page PJ (1999) Theoretical, analysis of automotive emissions measurements at 3 m and 10 m ranges. In: Proceedings of the 13th Zurich EMC symposium, pp 285–289, Feb 1999

    Google Scholar 

  14. SAE Recommended Practice J551-5:2012 (2012) Performance levels and methods of measurement of magnetic and electric field strength from electric vehicles, 150 kHz to 30 MHz, 11 May 2012

    Google Scholar 

  15. de Santiago J, Bernhoff H, Ekergård B, Eriksson S, Ferhatovic S, Waters R, Leijon M (2012) Electrical motor drivelines in commercial all-electric vehicles: a review. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 61(2):475–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 1999/519/EC (1999) Council recommendation of 12th July 1999 on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz–300 GHz). Off J EC, No L 199, pp 59–70, 30 July 1999

    Google Scholar 

  17. ICNIRP (1998) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys 74(4):494–522, April 1998

    Google Scholar 

  18. Directive 2013/35/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26th June 2013 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (20th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) and repealing Directive 2004/40/EC. Off J EU, No L 179, pp 1–21, 29 June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  19. ICNIRP (2010) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz–100 kHz). Health Phys 99(6):818–836

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ruddle AR, Low L, Vassilev A (2013) Evaluating low frequency magnetic field exposure from traction current transients in electric vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 12th international European EMC symposium, Bruges, Belgium, pp 78–83, Sept 2013

    Google Scholar 

  21. CENELEC, EN 45502 Active implantable medical devices, 2 parts

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kainz W, Casamento JP, Ruggera PS, Chan DD, Witters DM (2005) Implantable cardiac pacemaker electromagnetic compatibility testing in a novel security system simulator. IEEE Trans Biomedical Eng 52(3):520–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. della Chiara G, Primiani VM, Moglie F (2007) Experimental and numeric investigation about electromagnetic interference between implantable cardiac pacemaker and magnetic fields at power line frequency. Ann Ist Super Sanità 43(3):248–253

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement no. 314609. The authors are grateful for the support and contributions from other members of the HEMIS project consortium, from CEIT (Spain), IDIADA (Spain), Jema (Spain), MIRA (UK), Politecnico di Milano (Italy), VTT (Finland) and York EMC Services (UK). Further information can be found on the project website (www.hemis-eu.org).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alastair R. Ruddle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ruddle, A.R., Armstrong, R., Galarza, A. (2015). HEMIS Project (Electrical Powertrain HEalth Monitoring for Increased Safety of FEVs): Limitations of Electromagnetic Standards for Vehicles Equipped with Electrical Powertrain. In: Müller, B., Meyer, G. (eds) Electric Vehicle Systems Architecture and Standardization Needs. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13656-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13656-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13655-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13656-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation