SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of Training Transfer Factors: The FET Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transfer of Learning in Organizations

  • 1715 Accesses

Abstract

Learning transfer is the main goal that organizations look for, when they invest in training. Due to the difficulty to evaluate transfer directly, many authors have already created different models of transfer factors, which allow diagnosing the aspects that facilitate or hinder transfer. Nevertheless, there is little evidence that these factors are, in fact, transfer predictors. In this chapter, we present the FET (Factors for the Evaluation of Transfer) model as an instrument to measure indirectly and predict training transfer. We expose the theoretical background of the FET model, based on three transfer dimensions (trainee, training, and organization), and on training results (achieved learning, intent to transfer, and deferred transfer). Through Exploratory Factor Analysis, we did a first validation of all the scales that are included in the model; and through multiple regressions, we ascertained the impact of the different variables on the deferred transfer. Results indicate that transfer factors have a greater predictive power on transfer (R 2 = 0.33), rather than achieved learning (R 2 = 0.14) and intent to transfer (R 2 = 0.16); and that the orientation towards job needs is the factor with the strongest impact on transfer (β = 0.33, p < 0.05). Then, the FET model allows us to reliably assess transfer factors as well as predict them moderately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 85.59
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 105.49
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 105.49
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    We tried to report β and p coefficients; when the articles we used did not provide these statistical coefficients, we have reported the nearest one.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alliger, G. M., Tannenbaum, S. I., Bennett, W. Jr., Traver, H., & Shotland, A. (1997). A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel Psychology, 50(2), 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awoniyi, E. A., Griego, O. V., & Morgan, G. A. (2002). Person–environment fit and transfer of training. International Journal of Training and Development, 6(1), 25–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Axtell, C. M., Maitlis, S., & Yearta, S. K. (1997). Predicting immediate and longer-term transfer. Personnel Review, 26(3), 201–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R. A. (2001). Public sector training participation: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Training and Development, 5(2), 136–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, R. O., & Montesino, M. U. (1995). Partnerships for training transfer: Lessons from a corporate study. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 6(3), 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & Morrissey, L. (2004). The effectiveness of verbal self-guidance as a transfer of training intervention: Its impact on presentation performance, self efficacy and anxiety. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(3), 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2007). Training transfer: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 6(7), 263–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2008). A study of best practices in training transfer and proposed model of transfer. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 19(2), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkolter, D., Kluge, A., Sauer, J., & Ritzmann, S. (2009). The predictive qualities of operator characteristics for process control performance: The influence of personality and cognitive variables. Ergonomics, 52(3), 302–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaburu, D. S., & Marinova, S. V. (2005). What predicts skill transfer? An exploratory study of goal orientation, training self-efficacy, and organizational supports. International Journal of Training and Development, 9(2), 110–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, N. (2002). Job/work environment factors influencing training effectiveness within a human service agency: Some indicative support for Baldwin and Ford’s transfer climate construct. International Journal of Training and Development, 6(3), 146–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. S., Dobbins, G. H., & Ladd, R. T. (1993). Exploratory field study of training motivation: Influence of involvement, credibility, and transfer climate. Group & Organization Management, 18(3), 292–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45(12), 1304–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 678–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combs, G. M., & Luthans, F. (2007). Diversity training: Analysis of the impact of self-efficacy. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18(1), 91–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6(2), 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facteau, J. D., Dobbins, G. H., Russel, J. E. A., Ladd, R. T., & Kudisch, J. D. (1995). The influence of general perceptions of the training environment on pretraining motivation and perceived training transfer. Journal of Management, 21(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. K., & Weissbein, D. A. (1997). Transfer of training: An updated review and analysis. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 10(2), 22–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frayne, C. A., & Geringer, J. M. (2000). Self-management training for improving job performance: A field experiment involving salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 361–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudine, A. P., & Saks, A. M. (2004). A longitudinal quasi-experiment on the effects of posttraining transfer interventions. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(1), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gegenfurtner, A. (2011). Motivation and transfer in professional training: A meta-analysis of the moderating effects of knowledge type, instruction, and assessment conditions. Educational Research Review, 6(3), 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gegenfurtner, A., Festner, D., Gallenberger, W., Lehtinen, E., & Gruber, H. (2009). Predicting autonomous and controlled motivation to transfer training. International Journal of Training and Development, 13(2), 124–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire, T. K., Propp, J., & Poertner, J. (1998). The supervisor’s role in the transfer of training. Administration in Social Work, 22(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover. Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2010). The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, J. D., & Barnard, J. K. (2005). Work environment characteristics and implications for training transfer: A case study of the nuclear power industry. Human Resource Development International, 8(1), 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, R., Fernández-Collado, C., & Baptista, P. (2008). Metodología de la investigación (4th ed). México: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holladay, C. L., & Quiñones, M. A. (2003). Practice variability and transfer of training: The role of self-efficacy generality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 1094–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holton, E. F. (1996). The flawed four-level evaluation model. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holton, E. F. (2005). Holton’s evaluation model: New evidence and construct elaborations. Advances in Develo** Human Resources, 7(1), 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holton, E. F., Bates, R. A., & Ruona, W. E. A. (2000). Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(4), 333–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, M. J. (1998). Transfer of training: A multi-stage model designed for practical use by organizations. In C. Scholz & J. Zentes (Eds.), Strategisches Euro-Management (pp. 301–321). Stuttgart: Schaffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluación de acciones formativas. Los cuatro niveles. Barcelona: EPISE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschenbaum, A., & Weisberg. J. (2001). Employee’s turnover intentions and job destination choices. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1), 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontoghiorghes, C. (2004). Reconceptualizing the learning transfer conceptual framework: Empirical validation of a new systemic model. International Journal of Training and Development, 8(3), 210–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuchinke, K. P. (2000). The role of feedback in management training settings. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(4), 381–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2006). Influence of trainee characteristics, instructional satisfaction, and organizational climate on perceived learning and training transfer. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 17(1), 85–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machin, M. A., & Fogarty, G. J. (2003). Perceptions of training—related factors and personal variables as predictors of transfer implementation intentions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(1), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machin, M. A., & Fogarty, G. J. (2004). Assessing the antecedents of transfer intentions in a training context. International Journal of Training and Development, 8(3), 222–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín, M. C. (2004). Diseño y validación de cuestionarios. Matronas Profesión, 5(17), 23–29. Retrieved from http://www.enferpro.com/documentos/validacion_cuestionarios.pdf

  • Marx, R. D. (1982). Relapse prevention for managerial training: A model for maintenance of behavior change. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 433–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., Martineau, J. W., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1993). Individual and situational influences on the development of self-efficacy: Implications for training effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 46(1), 125–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales Vallejo, P. (2006). Medición de actitudes en Psicología y Educación (3rd ed). Madrid: Universidad Pontificia Comillas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno Andrés, M. V. (2009). Avaluació de la transferència de la formació contínua per a directius/ves de l’Administració Pública de Catalunya: creació, aplicació i anàlisi d’un model d’avaluació de la transferència. PhD Thesis. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe, R. A. (1986). Trainees’ attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 736–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe, R. A. (1988). Women and mentoring: A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe, R. A., & Schmitt, N. (1986). The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: Test of a model. Personnel Psychology, 39(3), 497–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noe, R. A., & Wilk, S. L. (1993). Investigation of the factors that influence employees’ participation in development activities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Martocchio, J. J., & Frink, D. D. (1994). A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1285–1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, J. W., Heslin, R., & Jones, J. E. (1976). Instrumentation in human relations training: A guide to 92 instruments with wide application to the behavioral sciences. San Diego: University Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pineda, P. (2010). Evaluation of training in organizations: A proposal for an integrated model. Journal of European Industrial Training, 34(7), 673–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pineda, P. (coords.) (2013). Evaluación de la eficacia de la eficacia de la formación para la innovación: Análisis de casos de éxito. Research report

    Google Scholar 

  • Pineda Herrero, P., & Quesada Pallarès, C. (2013). Evaluación de la transferencia de la formación continua mediante el modelo ETF de factores. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 61(1). Retrieved from http://www.rieoei.org/deloslectores/5290Pineda.pdf.

  • Rouiller, J. Z., & Goldstein, I. L. (1993). The relationship between organizational transfer climate and positive transfer of training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 4(4), 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royer, J. M. (1979). Theories of the transfer of learning. Educational Psychologist, 14(1), 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruona, W. E. A., Leimbach, M., Holton, E. F., & Bates, R. (2002). The relationship between learner utility reactions and predicted learning transfer among trainees. International Journal of Training and Development, 6(4), 218–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Rozell, D., Mullen, B., & Driskell, J. E. (1999). The effect of team building on performance: An integration. Small Group Research, 30(3), 309–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Salas, E., & Brannick, M. T. (2001). To transfer or not to transfer? Investigating the combined effects of trainee characteristics, team leader support, and team climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. A., Hall, R. J., & Boyce, C. (2003). The role of employee reactions in predicting training effectiveness. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(4), 397–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, S. I., & Yukl, G. (1992). Training and development in work organizations. Annual review of psychology, 43(1), 399–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P., Russ-Eft, D., & Chan, D. (2005). A meta-analytic review of behavior modeling training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 692–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thayer PW, Teachout MS. (1995). A Climate for Transfer Model. Rep. AL/HR-TP-1995-0035, Air Force Mat. Command, Brooks Air Force Base, Tex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, B. J., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Kavanagh, M. J. (1995). Applying trained skills on the job: The importance of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tziner, A., Haccoun, R. R., & Kadish, A. (1991). Personal and situational characteristics influencing the effectiveness of transfer of training improvement strategies. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64(2), 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Klink, M., Gielen, E., & Nauta, C. (2001). Supervisory support as a major condition to enhance transfer. International Journal of Training and Development, 5(1), 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velada, R., Caetano, A., Michel, J. W., Lyons, B. D., & Kavanagh, M. J. (2007). The effects of training design, individual characteristics and work environment on transfer of training. International Journal of Training and Development, 11(4), 282–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, S. L., Nordstrom, C. R., & Williams, K. B. (1998). The effect of enhancing selfefficacy prior to job training. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13(4), 633–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • **ao, J. (1996). The relationship between organizational factors and the transfer of training in the electronics industry in Shenzhen, China. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7(1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamkovenko, B., & Holton, III., & E., F. (2009). Towards a theoretical model of dispositional influences on transfer of learning. 10th AHRD International Conference on Human Resource Development. Newcastle: UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarnold, P. R., Mueser, K. T., & Lyons, J. S. (1988). Type A behaviour, accountability, and work rate in small groups. Journal of Research in Personality, 22(3), 353–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Pilar Pineda-Herrero, Carla Quesada-Pallarès & Anna Ciraso-Calí

Authors
  1. Pilar Pineda-Herrero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carla Quesada-Pallarès
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anna Ciraso-Calí
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pilar Pineda-Herrero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Thüringen, Germany

    Käthe Schneider

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pineda-Herrero, P., Quesada-Pallarès, C., Ciraso-Calí, A. (2014). Evaluation of Training Transfer Factors: The FET Model. In: Schneider, K. (eds) Transfer of Learning in Organizations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02093-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation