Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in K-12 social studies education presents a complex blend of opportunities and challenges. This paper explores the transformative potential and ethical dilemmas of employing AI, particularly in engaging with historical primary sources. Utilizing a Delphi methodology, this study captures insights from social studies educators on AI's role in enhancing or complicating the teaching and learning process. The research reveals the transformative potential of AI to deepen historical understanding and empathy through innovative tools, yet it also underscores significant concerns about the accuracy, representation of historical events and figures, and the authenticity of educational content. This exploration presents the paradox inherent in educational AI: its ability to radically transform learning experiences with innovative tools while also threatening to obscure the distinction between historical accuracy and fabrication. The emerging capabilities of generative AI prompt vital questions concerning the legitimacy of information, trustworthiness, and authenticity in historical representation. We consider the implications of AI for pedagogy, emphasizing the need for instructional approaches that engage students in the critical analysis of complex influences sha** historical narratives and visual representations. The paper also addresses the role of AI in perpetuating or challenging historical narratives and biases. It underscores the importance of critical theory in social studies education to analyze the impact of synthetic media and conversational AI agents on students’ perceptions of history. We emphasize the need for collaboration between educators, technologists, and historians to ensure that AI tools enrich the educational landscape without compromising the integrity and complexity of historical understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berson, I.R., Berson, M.J.: The democratization of AI and its transformative potential in social studies education. Soc. Educ. 87(2), 114–118 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Council for the Social Studies: New definition of social studies approved. https://www.socialstudies.org/media-information/definition-social-studies-nov2023

  3. Berson, I.R., Berson, M.J.: Develo** multiple literacies of young learners with digital primary sources. In: Russell, W. (ed.) Digital Social Studies, pp. 45–60. Information Age Publishing (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berson, I.R., Berson, M.J., Dennis, D. V., Powell, R.: Leveraging literacy: research on critical reading in the social studies. In: Manfra, M.M., Bolick, C.M. (eds.) Handbook of Social Studies Research, pp. 414–439. Wiley-Blackwell (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berson, I.R., Berson, M.J., Snow, B.: KidCitizen: designing an app for inquiry with primary sources. Soc. Educ. 81(2), 105–108 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Luo, W., et al.: Aladdin’s genie or Pandora’s box for early childhood education? experts chat on the roles, challenges, and developments of ChatGPT. Early Educ. Dev. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2023.2214181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berson, I.R., Berson, M.J., Luo, W., He, H.: Intelligence augmentation in early childhood education: a multimodal creative inquiry approach. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Dimitrova, V., Matsuda, N., Santos, O.C. (eds.) Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 1831, pp. 756–763. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_116

  8. Martorella, P.H.: Consensus building among social educators: a Delphi study. Theory Res. Soc. Educ. 19(1), 83–94 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1991.10505629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fogo, B.: Core practices for teaching history: the results of a Delphi panel survey. Theory Res. Soc. Educ. 42(2), 151–196 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2014.902781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Danoff, M., Kyung, Y.: Simulating the past: the case for AI in history pedagogy, Teachers College, Columbia University (2022). https://media.journoportfolio.com/users/296141/uploads/67c3735e-b156-4729-93a1-a5c4b8b6bce0.pdf

  11. Burgard, K.L.B., Boucher, M.L., Ellsworth, T.M.: Reexamining the classroom simulation: guidelines for making affirming pedagogical choices. Middle Sch. J. 55(1), 4–12 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2023.2282600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sheng, X.: The role of artificial intelligence in history education of Chinese high schools. J. Educ. Humanities Soc. Sci. 8 (2023). https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4255

  13. Toktamysov, S., Alwaely, S.A., Gallyamova, Z.: Digital technologies in history training: the impact on students` academic performance. Educ. Inf. Technol. 28, 2173–2186 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11210-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Caporusso, N.: Deepfakes for the good: a beneficial application of contentious artificial intelligence technology. In: Ahram, T. (ed.) Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 1213, pp. 235–241. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51328-3_33

  15. Selwyn, N.: On the limits of artificial intelligence (AI) in education. Nordisk tidsskrift for pedagogikk og kritikk 10, 3–14 (2024). https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v10.6062

  16. Cook, P.: Beyond “fake news”: misinformation studies for a postdigital era. In: Parker, L. (ed.) Education in the Age of Misinformation: Philosophical and Pedagogical Explorations, pp. 9–31. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25871-8

  17. Giroux, H.A.: The crisis of public values in the age of the new media. Crit. Stud. Media Commun. 28(1), 8–29 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2011.544618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Giroux, H.A.: Critical theory and rationality in citizenship education. Curric. Inq. 10(4), 329–366 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1980.11075229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Giroux, H.A.: Resisting difference: Cultural studies and the discourse of critical pedagogy. In: Grossberg, L., Nelson, C., Treichler, P. (eds.) Cultural Studies, pp. 199–212. Routledge, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Casiraghi, S.: Anything new under the sun? Insights from a history of institutionalized AI ethics. Ethics Inf. Technol. 25 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-023-09702-0

  21. The Institute for Ethical AI in Education: The ethical framework for AI in education. https://www.buckingham.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/The-Institute-for-Ethical-AI-in-Education-The-Ethical-Framework-for-AI-in-Education.pdf

  22. Rennolds, N., Varanasi, L.: AI chatbots for historical figures are an ethical minefield (2023). https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-chatbots-ethics-dangers-historical-figures-2023-10

  23. Adams, C., Pente, P., Lemermeyer, G., Rockwell, G.: Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in K-12 education. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100131

  24. Coburn, C., Williams, K., Stroud, S.R.: Enhanced Realism or A.I.-Generated Illusion? Synthetic Voice in the Documentary Film Roadrunner. J. Media Ethics Explor. Questions Media Morality 37, 282–284 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2022.2113883

  25. Chan, H.Y., Liu, S.W., Hou, H.T.: Interacting with real-person non-player characters to learn history: development and playing behavior pattern analysis of a remote scaffolding-based situated educational game. Interact. Learn. Environ. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2192745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pataranutaporn, P., et al.: Living memories: AI-generated characters as digital mementos. In: International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI, pp. 889–901. Association for Computing Machinery (2023) https://doi.org/10.1145/3581641.3584065

  27. Hutson, J., Ratican, J.: Life, death, and AI: Exploring digital necromancy in popular culture—Ethical considerations, technological limitations, and the pet cemetery conundrum. Metaverse 4(1) (2023). https://doi.org/10.54517/m.v4i1.2166

  28. Haller, E., Rebedea, T.: Designing a chat-bot that simulates an historical figure. In: Proceedings - 19th International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science, CSCS 2013, pp. 582–589 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCS.2013.85

  29. Noh, Y.G., Hong, J.H.: Designing reenacted chatbots to enhance museum experience. Appl. Sci. 11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167420

  30. Jonker, E.: Reflections on history education: easy and difficult histories. J. Educ. Media Memory Soc. 4(1), 95–110 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3167/jemms.2011.040107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Melo-Pfeifer, S., Gertz, H.D.: Learning about disinformation through situated and responsive pedagogy: Bridging the gap between students’ digital and school lives. In: Parker, L. (ed.) Education in the Age of Misinformation: Philosophical and Pedagogical Explorations, pp. 225–249. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25871-8

  32. Hartman, S.: Venus in two acts. Small Axe: A Caribbean J. Criticism 12(2), 1–14 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1215/-12-2-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hartman, S.: Wayward lives, beautiful experiments: Intimate histories of social upheaval. W.W. Norton and Company (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Diliberti, M.K., Woo, A., Kaufman, J.H.: The missing infrastructure for elementary (K-5) social studies instruction: Findings from the 2022 American instructional resources survey. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA (2023). https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA134-17.html

  35. Diliberti, M.K., Schwartz, H.L., Doan, S.Y., Shapiro, A., Rainey, L.R., Lake, R.J.: Using artificial intelligence tools in K-12 classrooms. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA (2024). https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA956-21.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilene R. Berson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Berson, I.R., Berson, M.J. (2024). AI in K-12 Social Studies Education: A Critical Examination of Ethical and Practical Challenges. In: Olney, A.M., Chounta, IA., Liu, Z., Santos, O.C., Bittencourt, I.I. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium and Blue Sky. AIED 2024. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 2150. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64315-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64315-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-64314-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-64315-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation