Abstract
Since GPT-4’s release it has shown novel abilities in a variety of domains. This paper explores the use of LLM-generated explanations as on-demand assistance for problems within the ASSISTments platform. In particular, we are studying whether GPT-generated explanations are better than nothing on problems that have no supports and whether GPT-generated explanations are as good as or better than teacher-authored explanations. This study contributes to existing literature since as of yet, there are no studies on the scale of ASSISTments evaluating the effectiveness of GPT support in education. Should GPT explanations prove effective then we plan to continue develo** and evaluating explanations, hints, and other supports with GPT within ASSISTments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, D.M., et al.: Using erroneous examples to improve mathematics learning with a web-based tutoring system. Comput. Hum. Behav. 36, 401–411 (2014)
Feng, M., Heffernan, N.T.: Informing teachers live about student learning: reporting in the assistment system. Technol. Instr. Cogn. Learn. 3(1/2), 63 (2006)
Gurung, A., et al.: How common are common wrong answers? Crowdsourcing remediation at scale. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, L@S 2023, pp. 70–80. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3573051.3593390
Heffernan, N.T., Heffernan, C.L.: The ASSISTments ecosystem: building a platform that brings scientists and teachers together for minimally invasive research on human learning and teaching. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 24(4), 470–497 (2014)
Imani, S., Du, L., Shrivastava, H.: MathPrompter: mathematical reasoning using large language models (2023)
Khanmigo (2023). https://khanmigo.ai/
Markel, J.M., Opferman, S.G., Landay, J.A., Piech, C.: GPTeach: interactive ta training with GPT-based students. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, L@S 2023, pp. 226–236. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3573051.3593393
McLaren, B.M., van Gog, T., Ganoe, C., Karabinos, M., Yaron, D.: The efficiency of worked examples compared to erroneous examples, tutored problem solving, and problem solving in computer-based learning environments. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55, 87–99 (2016)
Pardos, Z.A., Bhandari, S.: Learning gain differences between ChatGPT and human tutor generated algebra hints (2023)
Patikorn, T., Heffernan, N.T.: Effectiveness of crowd-sourcing on-demand assistance from teachers in online learning platforms. In: Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, L@S 2020, pp. 115–124. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3386527.3405912
Prihar, E., et al.: Comparing different approaches to generating mathematics explanations using large language models. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Dimitrova, V., Matsuda, N., Santos, O.C. (eds.) AIED 2023. CCIS, vol. 1831, pp. 290–295. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_45
Prihar, E., Patikorn, T., Botelho, A., Sales, A., Heffernan, N.: Toward personalizing students’ education with crowdsourced tutoring. In: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, L@S 2021, pp. 37–45. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3430895.3460130
Razzaq, L.M., Heffernan, N.T.: To tutor or not to tutor: that is the question. In: Dimitrova, V. (ed.) AIED, pp. 457–464. IOS Press (2009)
Schnepper, L.C., McCoy, L.P.: Analysis of misconceptions in high school mathematics. Netw. Online J. Teach. Res. 15(1), 625–625 (2013). https://newprairiepress.org/networks/vol15/iss1/7/
VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T., Baggett, W.B.: Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cogn. Instr. 21(3), 209–249 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2103_01
Wei, J., et al.: Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. In: Koyejo, S., Mohamed, S., Agarwal, A., Belgrave, D., Cho, K., Oh, A. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 24824–24837. Curran Associates, Inc. (2022). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/9d5609613524ecf4f15af0f7b31abca4-Paper-Conference.pdf
Whitehill, J., Seltzer, M.: A crowdsourcing approach to collecting tutorial videos–toward personalized learning-at-scale. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, pp. 157–160 (2017)
Williams, J.J., et al.: AXIS: generating explanations at scale with learnersourcing and machine learning. In: Proceedings of the Third ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, pp. 379–388 (2016)
**ao, C., Xu, S.X., Zhang, K., Wang, Y., **a, L.: Evaluating reading comprehension exercises generated by LLMs: a showcase of ChatGPT in education applications. In: Proceedings of the 18th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2023), pp. 610–625 (2023)
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank NSF (2118725, 2118904, 1950683, 1917808, 1931523, 1940236, 1917713, 1903304, 1822830, 1759229, 1724889, 1636782, & 1535428), IES (R305N210049, R305D210031, R305A170137, R305A170243, R305A180401, R305A120125, & R305R220012), GAANN (P200A120238, P200A180088, P200A150306, & P200A150306), EIR (U411B190024 S411B210024, & S411B220024), ONR (N00014-18-1-2768), NIH (via a SBIR R44GM146483), Schmidt Futures, BMGF, CZI, Arnold, Hewlett and a $180,000 anonymous donation. None of the opinions expressed here are those of the funders.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Haim, A., Worden, E., Heffernan, N.T. (2024). The Effectiveness of AI Generated, On-Demand Assistance Within Online Learning Platforms. In: Olney, A.M., Chounta, IA., Liu, Z., Santos, O.C., Bittencourt, I.I. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium and Blue Sky. AIED 2024. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 2151. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64312-5_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64312-5_45
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-64311-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-64312-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)