Comparative Analysis of MH Versus LED Prototype Luminaires: Case Study for Lighting Public Areas

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovation and Research – Smart Technologies & Systems (CI3 2023)

Abstract

The primary aim of this study is to validate prototype Light Emitting Diodes (LED) luminaires designed for outdoor applications. It involves replacing 7 metal halide luminaires (MH) with 7 LED luminaires, covering an area of 1129 m. The results reveal significant improvements in illumination, as demonstrated by a comparative distribution and illuminance graph. The LED luminaires achieve an average illuminance of 27.9 lx with a relatively low standard deviation of 15.8, whereas the MH luminaires only attain an average of 25.7 lx, accompanied by a high deviation of 24.7. Moreover, the study delves into the environmental and economic implications of this transition. By applying Ecuadorian electrical system factors, it was determined that the LED luminaires result in a substantial 64.8% reduction in energy consumption, equating to 3,740 kWh saved annually. This leads to considerable monetary savings of 505 dollars, and a noteworthy reduction of 1,279 kg of CO2 emissions every year, contributing to a more sustainable and cost-effective lighting solution for the 7-luminaire system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vanesa Carolina, B.L., Trujillo Guerrero, M.F., Pozo Palma, P.M., Chasi Gallo, C.C., Chavez Tapia, G.S.: International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Science (INCISCOS) (2018), pp. 107–114 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen, K.Q., Tran, P.D., Nguyen, L.T., To, P.V., Morris, C.J.: Aquac Fish 6, 432 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferreira, V.J., Knoche, S., Verma, J., Corchero, C.: J. Clean. Prod. 317, 128575 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Orzáez, H., Jesús, M.: Technological led´s change in public projects lighting. “swot” analysis: strengths and weaknesses (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Valentová, M., Quicheron, M., Bertoldi, P.: Int. J. Green Ene. 12, 843 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rode, I., Moriarty, M., Beattie, C., Mcintosh, J., Hargroves, K.: Technologies and Processes to Reduce Carbon Intensity of Main Road Projects (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. García-Tenorio, F.A., Simisterra-Quintero, J.J., Barre-Cedeño, K.N., Bautista-Sánchez, J.V., Chere-Quiñónez, B.F.: Sapienza: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 3, 245 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Profesional, C., Hermes, J., Hijar, L., Alcántara, F., Lima -Perú, M.: Facultad de Ingeniería (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bosco, L.D., Catuogno, G.R., Flores, H.D.: IEEE Congreso Bienal de Argentina (ARGENCON), pp. 1–4 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rueda-Punina, V.J.: FIGEMPA: Investigación y Desarrollo 14, 111 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luna, V., Arias-Cazco, D., Aguila Téllez, A.: in (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Novasinergia revista digital de ciencia, ingeniería y tecnología 5, 58 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davidovic, M., Kostic, M.: Energy 254, 124299 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fryc, I., Czyżewski, D., Fan, J., Gălăţanu, C.D.: Energies (Basel) 14 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morgan Pattison, P., Hansen, M., Tsao, J.Y.: C R Phys 19, 134 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolina Chasi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Moreno, G., Peralta, D., Molina, J., Chasi, C., Martínez-Gómez, J. (2024). Comparative Analysis of MH Versus LED Prototype Luminaires: Case Study for Lighting Public Areas. In: Vizuete, M.Z., et al. Innovation and Research – Smart Technologies & Systems. CI3 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 1041. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63437-6_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation