The Accessibility Paradox: Can Research Articles Inspecting Accessibility Be Inaccessible?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computers Hel** People with Special Needs (ICCHP 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14750))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Relevant literature focusing on the accessibility of electronic documents (e.g., PDFs) has been increasing in recent years. Despite its significance, paradoxically, scientific articles, even those related to accessibility-themed topics, often fail to provide fully accessible content, thus creating a gap between theory and practice. Therefore, we aimed to explore how PDF versions of academic articles on digital accessibility evaluation, published in the past ten years, comply with established accessibility standards. We performed a tool-based evaluation using Adobe Accessibility Checker and a manual evaluation to inspect the articles comprehensively. The results showed that none of the analyzed articles were problem-free. They, however, contained recurring, severe accessibility barriers, making it highly challenging for people who rely on screen readers to access information. Also, the evaluated data showed no discernible pattern of changes over the years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Acosta-Vargas, P., Luján-Mora, S., Acosta, T.: Accessibility of portable document format in education repositories. In: 9th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers, pp. 239–242 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adobe Acrobat XI Pro Accessibility Guide: Best Practices for PDF Accessibility. https://acrobatusers.com/assets/uploads/public_downloads/2190/acrobat-xi-pro-accessibility-best-practice-guide.pdf. Accessed 28 Mar 2024

  3. Antonelli, H.L., Rodrigues, S.S., Watanabe, W.M., de Mattos Fortes, R.P.: A survey on accessibility awareness of Brazilian web developers. In: 8th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion, pp. 71–79 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bigham, J.P., Brady, E.L., Gleason, C., Guo, A., Shamma, D.A.: An uninteresting tour through why our research papers aren’t accessible. In: CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 621–631 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brady, E., Zhong, Y., Bigham, J.P.: Creating accessible PDFs for conference proceedings. In: 12th International Web for All Conference, pp. 1–4 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Darvishy, A.: PDF accessibility: tools and challenges. In: Miesenberger, K., Kouroupetroglou, G. (eds.) ICCHP 2018. LNCS, vol. 10896, pp. 113–116. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94277-3_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Devine, H., Gonzalez, A., Hardy, M.: Making accessible PDF documents. In: 11th ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, pp. 275–276 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doblies, L., Stolz, D., Darvishy, A., Hutter, H.-P.: PAVE: a Web application to identify and correct accessibility problems in PDF documents. In: Miesenberger, K., Fels, D., Archambault, D., Peňáz, P., Zagler, W. (eds.) Computers Hel** People with Special Needs, pp. 185–192. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08596-8_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Domínguez Vila, T., Alén González, E., Darcy, S.: Accessibility of tourism websites: the level of countries’ commitment. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 19(2), 331–346 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drümmer, O., Erle, M.: PDF/UA – a new era for document accessibility: understanding, managing and implementing the ISO standard PDF/UA (universal accessibility): introduction to the special thematic session. In: Miesenberger, K., Karshmer, A., Penaz, P., Zagler, W. (eds.) ICCHP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7382, pp. 585–586. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31522-0_88

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Inal, Y.: I feel for you! The effect of empathy exercises on accessibility awareness. Universal Access in the Information Society (2024)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Inal, Y., Guribye, F., Rajanen, D., Rajanen, M., Rost, M.: Perspectives and practices of digital accessibility: a survey of user experience professionals in Nordic countries. In: 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Sha** Experiences, Sha** Society, pp. 1–11 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Inal, Y., Mishra, D., Torkildsby, A.B.: An analysis of web content accessibility of municipality websites for people with disabilities in Norway: Web accessibility of Norwegian municipality websites. In: Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference, pp. 1–12 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Inal, Y., Torkildsby, A.B.: Web accessibility in Higher Education in Norway: to what extent are university websites accessible? In: Nocera, J.A., Lárusdóttir, M.K., Petrie, H., Piccinno, A., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2023, pp. 111–122. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42280-5_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Ismailova, R., Inal, Y.: Comparison of online accessibility evaluation tools: an analysis of tool effectiveness. IEEE Access 10, 58233–58239 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nganji, J.T.: The Portable Document Format (PDF) accessibility practice of four journal publishers. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 37(3), 254–262 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nganji, J.T.: An assessment of the accessibility of PDF versions of selected journal articles published in a WCAG 2.0 era (2014–2018). Learned Publishing 31(4), 391–401 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pradhan, D., et al.: Development and evaluation of a tool for assisting content creators in making PDF files more accessible. ACM Trans. Accessible Comput. 15(1), 1–52 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ribera, M., Pozzobon, R., Sayago, S.: Publishing accessible proceedings: the DSAI 2016 case study. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 19(3), 557–569 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Attila Bekkvik Szentirmai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Szentirmai, A.B., Inal, Y., Torkildsby, A.B. (2024). The Accessibility Paradox: Can Research Articles Inspecting Accessibility Be Inaccessible?. In: Miesenberger, K., Peňáz, P., Kobayashi, M. (eds) Computers Hel** People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14750. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62846-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62846-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-62845-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-62846-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation