Abstract
The vulnerability assessment of architectural cultural heritage represents a challenging, however necessary, activity towards defining risk preparedness plans for historic urban environments and more resilient communities. Nevertheless, the singularities and specificities that historical constructions often present the need for customising/tailoring and adapting generalised and common vulnerability assessment approaches. The balance between detail and scale when surveying historical structures implies that the feasibility of achieving urban-scale data acquisitions depends primarily on adopting relatively simple models and descriptions. In this sense, several simplified (often parametric) approaches have been developed for assessing the seismic vulnerability of historical constructions based on a limited set of descriptors. Although the selection of the parameters that influence the seismic response of the structures have been drawn from empirical observations (e.g., in the aftermath of intense seismic events), such regressive analysis may be improved and facilitated by employing Machine Learning categorisation algorithms. This chapter investigates the usability of parameter-based screenings of historical cities for assembling an urban-scale database that is further used for assessing the analytical vulnerability of historical constructions based on existing intensity/damage models. Furthermore, the observations acquired in the aftermath of a strong seismic event (that of the 19th of September 2017 in Mexico) are herein used for calibrating the model using a Random Forest Classifier algorithm, achieving a more representative intensity/damage model and, therefore, representing an opportunity for obtaining typologically tailored seismic vulnerability models in the context of a feasible urban-scale survey and post-earthquake observations. These trained algorithms are valuable tools in supporting risk preparedness and management policies based on the results of rapid screenings for proactively identifying vulnerable assets and evaluating the impact of different mitigation measures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Y. Alberto, M. Otsubo, H. Kyokawa, T. Kiyota, I. Towhata, Reconnaissance of the 2017 Puebla, Mexico earthquake. Soils Found. 58, 1073–1092 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.06.007
A. Borri, M. Corradi, G. Castori, A. De Maria, A method for the analysis and classification of historic masonry. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 13, 2647–2665 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9731-4
C. Alvarado Rosas, Conservación del patrimonio cultural en el Pueblo Mágico de Tepoztlán, Morelos (2001–2012). Territorios 16, 15–33 (2015). https://doi.org/10.12804/territ32.2015.01
C. Dore, M. Murphy, Integration of historic building information modeling (HBIM) and 3D GIS for recording and managing cultural heritage sites, in 2012 18th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia (IEEE, 2012), pp. 369–376
G.M. Calvi, R. Pinho, G. Magenes, J.J. Bommer, L.F. Restrepo-Vélez, H. Crowley, Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years. ISET J. Earthq. Technol. 43, 75–104 (2006)
Centre Europèen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, European Macroseismic Scale 1998. Cah du Cent Eur Géodynamique Séismologie 15, 99 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2312/EMS-98.full.en
Consiglio dei Ministri della Reppublica Italiana. 9 Febbraio 2011—Valutazione e riduzione del rischio sismico del patrimonio culturale con riferimento alle Norme tecniche per le costruzioni di cui al decreto del Ministero deelle Infrastrutture e dei trasporti del 14 gennaio 2008, (2014)
T.M. Ferreira, R. Maio, R. Vicente, Seismic vulnerability assessment of the old city centre of Horta, Azores: calibration and application of a seismic vulnerability index method. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 15, 2879–2899 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0071-9
D.D. Fuentes, P.A. Baquedano Julià , M. D’Amato, M. Laterza, Preliminary seismic damage assessment of Mexican Churches after September 2017 earthquakes. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 15, 505–525 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1628323
Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti—GNDT, Scheda di esposizione e vulnerabilità e di rilevamento danni di primo e secondo livello (murata e cemento armato) (Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti, Rome, Italy, 1994)
I. Guyon, A. Elisseeff, An introduction to feature extraction, in Feature Extraction (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006), pp. 1–25
INAH, Catálogo Nacional de Monumentos Históricos Inmuebles. In: Cent. Doc. la CNMH (2019). https://catalogonacionalmhi.inah.gob.mx/consultaPublica. Accessed 27 Oct 2020
K. Jordahl, J. Van den Bossche, M. Fleischmann, J. Wasserman, J. McBride, J. Gerard, J. Tratner, M. Perry, A.G. Badaracco, C. Farmer, G.A. Hjelle, A.D. Snow, M. Cochran, S. Gillies, L. Culbertson, M. Bartos, N. Eubank, M. Albert, A. Bilogur, S. Rey, C. Ren, D. Arribas-Bel, L. Wasser, L.J. Wolf, M. Journois, J. Wilson, A. Greenhall, C. Holdgraf, L.F. Filipe, geopandas/geopandas: v0.8.1 (2020)
L. Buitinck, G. Louppe, M. Blondel, F. Pedregosa, A. Mueller, O. Grisel, V. Niculae, P. Prettenhofer, A. Gramfort, J. Grobler, R. Layton, J. Vanderplas, A. Joly, B. Holt, G. Varoquaux, API design for machine learning software: experiences from the scikit-learn project, in European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (2013), pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.48550/ar**v.1309.0238
M. Dobias, V.M. Sab, P. Petrik, lutraconsulting/mergin: 2021.6.1 (Software) (2021)
M.H. Sykes, Manual on Systems of Inventorying Immovable Cultural Property, 1st edn. (Imprimerie de la Manutention, Mayenne, 1984)
R. Maio, T.M. Ferreira, R. Vicente, A critical discussion on the earthquake risk mitigation of urban cultural heritage assets. Int. J. Disast. Risk Reduct. 27, 239–247 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.010
QGIS Development Team, QGIS geographic information system (Software) (2021)
R. Ramirez Eudave, Seismic vulnerability calculator and database (Software) (2022)
R. RamÃrez Eudave, T.M. Ferreira, Characterisation of the historic urban landscape through the Aristotelian four causes: towards comprehensive GIS databases. Remote Sens. 13, 1879 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13101879
R. RamÃrez Eudave, T.M. Ferreira, On the potential of using the Mexican national catalogue of historical monuments for assessing the seismic vulnerability of existing buildings: a proof-of-concept study. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 19, 4945–4978 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01154-5
R. RamÃrez Eudave, T.M. Ferreira, R. Vicente, B. Paulo, F. Peña, Parametric and machine learning-based analysis of the seismic vulnerability of adobe historical buildings damaged after the September 2017 Mexico Earthquakes. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 18(6), 940–963 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2023.2200739
S. Brzev, C. Scawthorn, A. Charleson, L. Allen, M. Greene, K. Jaiswal, V. Silva, GEM Building Taxonomy Version 2.0. Pavia (2013)
V. Silva, S. Brzev, C. Scawthorn, C. Yepes, J. Dabbeek, H. Crowley, A building classification system for multi-hazard risk assessment. Int. J. Disast. Risk Sci. 13, 161–177 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-022-00400-x
T. Mizera, P. Petrik, M. Dobias, S. Sklencar, E.A. Taşkın, N. Belgacem, M. Varga, M. Kuhn, P. Wells, S. Natsis, lutraconsulting/input: Release 1.3.0 (Software) (2022)
United States Geological Survey USGS, M 7.1—1 km E of Ayutla, Mexico (Last revised: February/2020), in Earthquake Hazards Program (2017). https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us2000ar20/map?historic-seismicity=true&shakemap-intensity=false. Accessed 22 Jan 2021
S.R. Vadyala, S.N. Betgeri, J.C. Matthews, E. Matthews, A review of physics-based machine learning in civil engineering. Results Eng. 13, 100316 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2021.100316
Acknowledgements
This work was partly financed by FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC) under the R&D Unit Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering (ISISE), under reference UIDB/04029/2020. This research was funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through grant number PD/BD/150385/2019. The field campaigns in the State of Morelos were financed by the Instituto de IngenierÃa—Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (Institute of Engineering—National Autonomous University of Mexico) through the project R562.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eudave, R.R., Ferreira, T.M., Vicente, R. (2024). Machine Learning-Assisted Identification of Vulnerable Historic Buildings in Urban Environments. In: Tsihrintzis, G.A., Virvou, M., Doukas, H., Jain, L.C. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Decision Support Systems. Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems, vol 39. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62316-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62316-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-62315-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-62316-5
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)