Abstract
Moneyball is a 2011 movie about baseball and statistics. A movie about statistics that received six Academy Award nominations: best picture, best actor, best supporting actor, best adapted screenplay, best sound mixing, and best film editing. Hollywood legend Brad Pitt stars in the film as Billy Beane, the general manager of the Oakland Athletics, who transforms his team using stats. The movie is based on a 2003 book by Michael Lewis, Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game. The book that changed all sports. The book that taught the sports world about correlation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Gigerenzer, Gerd. “Mindless statistics.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 33, no. 5 (2004): 587–606.
- 2.
Hakess, Jahn K., and Raymond D. Sauer. “An economic evaluation of the Moneyball hypothesis.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20, no. 3 (2006): 173–186.
- 3.
Sowell, Thomas. The vision of the anointed: Self-congratulations as a basis for social policy. Hachette UK, 2019.
- 4.
Health and Safety Code Chapter 171: Abortion. Texas Statutes.
- 5.
Huang, Y., Zhang, X., Li, W. et al. (2014). A meta-analysis of the association between induced abortion and breast cancer risk among Chinese females. Cancer Causes Control, 25: 227.
Jiang AR, Gao CM, Ding JH, et al. (2012). Abortions and breast cancer risk in premenopausal and postmenopausal women in Jiangsu Province of China. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev., 13:33–35.
Kamath R, et al. (2013). A study on risk factors of breast cancer among patients attending the tertiary care hospital in Udupi district. Indian J Community Med, 38(2)95–99.
Michels KB, Xue F, Colditz GA, Willett WC. (2007). Induced and spontaneous abortion and incidence of breast cancer among young women: a prospective cohort study. Archives of Internal Medicine; 167(8):814–820.
Reeves GK, Kan SW, Key T, et al. (2006). Breast cancer risk in relation to abortion: results from the EPIC study. International Journal of Cancer; 119(7):1741–1745.
- 6.
Rosenblatt KA, Gao DL, Ray RM, Rowland MR, Nelson ZC, Wernli KJ, et al. Induced abortions and the risk of all cancers combined and site-specific cancers in Shanghai. Cancer Causes Control 2006;17:1275–80.
Reeves GK, Kan SW, Key T, Tjonneland A, Olsen A, Overvad K, et al. Breast cancer risk in relation to abortion: results from the EPIC study. Int J Cancer 2006;119:1741–5.
Michels KB, Xue F, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Induced and spontaneous abortion and inciNumber 434 June 2009 (Replaces No. 285, August 2003) 2 ACOG Committee Opinion No. 434 dence of breast cancer among young women: a prospective cohort study. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:814–20.
Lash TL, Fink AK. Null association between pregnancy termination and breast cancer in a registry-based study of parous women. Int J Cancer 2004;110:443–8.
Henderson KD, Sullivan-Halley J, Reynolds P, Horn-Ross PL, Clarke CA, Chang ET, et al. Incomplete pregnancy is not associated with breast cancer risk: the California Teachers Study. Contraception 2008;77:391–6.
- 7.
Beral, V., D. Bull, R. Doll, R. Peto, G. Reeves, P. A. van den Brandt, and R. A. Goldbohm. “Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast cancer: Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83,000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries.” Lancet 363, no. 9414 (2004): 1007–1016.
- 8.
ACS—American Cancer Society (Accessed 2020, December 8). Abortion and Breast Cancer [Online.] https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/medical-treatments/abortion-and-breast-cancer-risk.html
- 9.
Fisher, Ronald. “Cigarettes, cancer, and statistics.” The Centennial Review of Arts & Science 2 (1958): 151–166.
- 10.
Doll, Richard, and A. Bradford Hill. “Smoking and carcinoma of the lung.” British Medical Journal 2, no. 4682 (1950): 739.
- 11.
Doll, Richard, and A. Bradford Hill. “The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits.” British Medical Journal 1, no. 4877 (1954): 1451.
- 12.
Fisher, Ronald. “Cigarettes, cancer, and statistics.” The Centennial Review of Arts & Science 2 (1958): 151–166.
Fisher, Ronald A. “Lung cancer and cigarettes?” Nature 182, no. 4628 (1958): 108–108.
Fisher, R.A. “Cancer and smoking.” Nature 182, no. 4635 (1958): 596–596.
Fisher, Sir Ronald Aylmer. Smoking: the cancer controversy: some attempts to assess the evidence. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1959.
- 13.
Cornfield, Jerome, William Haenszel, E. Cuyler Hammond, Abraham M. Lilienfeld, Michael B. Shimkin, and Ernst L. Wynder. “Smoking and lung cancer: recent evidence and a discussion of some questions.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute 22, no. 1 (1959): 173–203.
- 14.
Stolley, Paul D. “When genius errs: RA Fisher and the lung cancer controversy.” American Journal of Epidemiology 133, no. 5 (1991): 416–425.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stewart, R.T. (2024). Correlation. In: Adventures in Statistics. Copernicus Books . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61284-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61284-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-61283-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-61284-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)