Enactments of Care in Early Childhood Education: Towards Inclusion and Transformation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Towards a Transformative Pedagogy for Early Childhood Care and Education

Abstract

There is a dearth of knowledge that considers how early childhood teachers working with young children interpret and enact an early childhood framework that does not explicitly make care practices visible. Following phenomenological interpretations of care, we argue that an understanding of care requires a focus on interactions and posit that an interaction becomes an instance where care relations are actualised and enacted. These care relations are situated within a framework of transformative pedagogy as they create conditions that support teachers and children develop their capacity as beings in relation with one another. This qualitative study formed part of a larger national project on transformative pedagogy in the early years. Using data derived from semi-structured interviews, early childhood teachers provided accounts of how they interpreted and enacted care practices through being and doing in ethical encounters with children. Data reveals that teachers are shaped by their own lived experiences of care as well as their own understanding of children and learning. Importantly, the contextual realities of their daily work produced teachers’ complex understandings of the agentic nature of the child. Findings have the potential to shift focus of care as embedded exclusively in pastoral care to an understanding of care practices as a relational activity that includes a combination of academic and care practices. This understanding offers a viable alternative to providing children with opportunities to meet their contextual needs. Equally, it locates the ontology of care as ethical acts that take place in interactions between teachers and children in early childhood settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The advantaged contexts had adequate teaching and learning resources, good physical infrastructure and received support from parents and the wider community. In the disadvantaged contexts, infrastructure was poor, there were fewer teaching and learning resources and the centre itself depended mainly on government subsidy for the day to day running of the centre as most parents were unemployed or working in underpaid jobs.

  2. 2.

    This is an entry-level Qualification for individuals who want to enter the field of Education, Training and Development within the sub-field of early childhood education (South African Qualifications Authority, 2007)

References

  • Ailwood, J. (2007). Mothers, teachers, maternalism and early childhood education and care: Some historical connections. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8(2), 157–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ailwood, J. (2017). Exploring the care in early childhood education and care. Global Studies of Childhood, 7(4), 305–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D., Walton, E., & Osman, R. (2021). Constraints to the implementation of inclusive teaching: A cultural historical activity theory approach. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(13), 1508–1523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, S., & Tesar, M. (2019). An ethics of care in culturally diverse early childhood settings: Toward an ethics of unknowing. In Theorizing feminist ethics of care in early childhood practice: Possibilities and dangers (pp. 37–57). Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, S., Tesar, M., Pupala, B., Kaščák, O., & Mbugua, T. (2016). Re-negotiating an ethics of care in Kenyan childhoods. Human Affairs, 26(3), 288–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslanian, T. K. (2015). Getting behind discourses of love, care and maternalism in early childhood education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 16(2), 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslanian, T. K. (2017). Ready or not, here they come! Care as a material and organizational practice in ECEC for children under two. Global Studies of Childhood, 7(4), 323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, K., Michell, D., & Due, C. (2016). Providing care for children: How service providers define and apply “care” in contemporary South Australia. Children Australia, 41, 178–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergnehr, D., & Cekaite, A. (2018). Adult-initiated touch and its functions at a Swedish preschool: Controlling, affectionate, assisting and educative haptic conduct. International Journal of Early Years Education, 26, 312–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biersteker, L., Dawes, A., Hendricks, L., & Tredoux, C. (2016). Center-based early childhood care and education program quality: A south African study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 334–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgault, S. (2016). Attentive listening and care in a neoliberal era: Weilian insights for hurried times. Ethics and Politics, 18(3), 311–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004.

  • Britto, P. R., Yoshikawa, H., & Boller, K. (2011). Quality of early childhood development programs in global contexts: Rationale for investment, conceptual framework and implications for equity and commentaries. Social Policy Report, 25(2), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cekaite, A., & Bergnehr, D. (2018). Affectionate touch and care: Embodied intimacy, compassion and control in early childhood education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 26(6), 940–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2018.1533710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cekaite, A., & Kvist Holm, M. (2017). The comforting touch: Tactile intimacy and talk in managing children’s distress. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(2), 109–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Basic Education. (2009). National Early Learning and development standards (NELDS) for children birth to four years. Government Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Basic Education. (2015). The south African National Curriculum Framework for children from birth to four. Government Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Basic Education (DoBE). (2001). Education White paper 5: Meeting the challenge of early childhood development in South Africa. Government Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Higher Education and Training [DHET]. (2017). Policy on the minimum requirements for programmes leading to qualifications in higher education for early childhood development educators, Government Gazette No. 40750, 31 March 2017, Department of Higher Education and Training, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, H. (2010). Tracing historical shifts in early care and education in South Africa. Journal of Education, 48, 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B., & Tronto, J. (1990). Toward a feminist theory of caring. In Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives (pp. 35–62). SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1998). Educators and cultural workers as cultural workers. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, E. (2014). The ethics of vulnerability: A feminist analysis of social life and practice. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow, J. (2008). Presence as a dimension of early childhood professional practice. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 33(1), 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goouch, K., & Powell, S. (2017). Babyroom workers: Care in practice. In Under-three year olds in policy and practice (pp. 143–157). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hamington, M. (2004). Embodied care: Jane Addams, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and feminist ethics. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamington, M. (2015). Politics is not a game: The radical potential of care. In D. Engster & M. Hamington (Eds.), Care ethics and political theory (pp. 272–292). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, D., Klopper, A., Osanyin, A., & Vanderlee, M. L. (2013). ‘It’s more than care’: Early childhood educators’ concepts of professionalism. Early Years, 33(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2012.667394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. (2007). The ethics of care: Personal, political, Global. OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, B., McKie, L., Hopkins, D., & Watson, N. (2005). Love’s labours lost? Feminism, the disabled people’s movement and an ethic of care. Sociology, 39(2), 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford, R. (2019). Theorizing feminist ethics of care in early childhood practice: Possibilities and dangers (p. 248). Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, R., & Richardson, B. (2020). Ethics of care in practice: An observational study of interactions and power relations between children and educators in urban Ontario early childhood settings. Journal of Childhood Studies, 45, 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford, R., & White, J. (2019). Conceptualizing care as being and doing in ethical interactions and sustained care relationships in the early childhood institution. In R. Langford (Ed.), Theorizing feminist ethics of care in early childhood practice: Possibilities and dangers (pp. 38–59). Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, R., Richardson, B., Albanese, P., Bezanson, K., Prentice, S., & White, J. (2017). Caring about care: Reasserting care as integral to early childhood education and care practice, politics and policies in Canada. Global Studies of Childhood, 7(4), 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laugier, S. (2015). The ethics of care as a politics of the ordinary. New Literary History, 46(2), 217–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipponen, L. (2017). Constituting cultures of compassion in early childhood educational settings. In Nordic dialogues on children and families (pp. 39–50). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfdahl, A., & Folke-Fichtelius, M. (2015). Preschool’s new suit: Care in terms of learning and knowledge. Early Years, 35(3), 260–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, S. A. (2008). Using transformative pedagogy when teaching online. College Teaching, 56(4), 219–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1996). Beyond Freire and Habermas: Confusion. A response to Bruce Pietrykowski. Adult Education Quarterly, 46(4), 237–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Monchinski, T. (2010). Education in hope: Critical pedagogies and the ethic of care (Vol. 382). Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muthukrishna, N., & Engelbrecht, P. (2018). Decolonising inclusive education in lower income, southern African educational contexts. South African Journal of Education, 38(4), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1999). Response: Two concepts of caring. Philosophy of Education Archive, 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2003). Caring. A feminine approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2015). Care ethics and “caring” organizations. In D. Engster & M. Hamington (Eds.), Care ethics and political theory (pp. 72–84). Oxford.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pagliano, P. J. (2011 January). Unlocking student’s potential: What can we learn about care theory in the education of students with vision impairment? Paper presented to the Biennial Conference of the South Pacific Educators in Vision Impairment, Marriot Sydney Harbour, 17.1.2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of South Africa. (2015). National integrated early childhood development policy. Government Printers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, F. (2011). A feminist approach to human security. Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick, S. (1980). Maternal thinking. Feminist Studies, 6, 342–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russon, J. (2014). Between two intimacies: The formative contexts of individual experience. Emotion, Space and Society, 13, 65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevenhuisjen, S. (1998). Citizenship and the ethics of care. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaik, N., Martin, C. D., & Moodley, T. (2021). Reframing listening for belonging and participation in early childhood care and education settings: A case in South Africa. Early Years, 43, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevalier, R., & McKenzie, B. A. (2012). Culturally responsive teaching as an ethics-and care-based approach to urban education. Urban Education, 47(6), 1086–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skae, V. A., Brown, B. J. L., & Wilmot, P. D. (2020). Teachers’ engagement with learners in inclusive foundation phase classrooms. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 10(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, G. (2016). Compassionate pedagogy: The ethics of care in early childhood professionalism. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(2), 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, G. (2019). Cultivating ethical dispositions in early childhood practice for an ethic of care: A contemplative approach. In Theorizing feminist ethics of care in early childhood practice: Possibilities and dangers (pp. 97–123).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. C. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. C. (2015). Who cares? Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Laere, K., & Vandenbroeck, M. (2018). The (in) convenience of care in preschool education: Examining staff views on educare. Early Years, 38(1), 4–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, A. (2014). ‘Relationships for me are the key for everything’: Early childhood teachers’ subjectivities as relational professionals. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 15(3), 262–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C. A. (2017). Empathy, teacher dispositions, and preparation for culturally responsive pedagogy. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(2), 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, A. (2021). Love in early childhood teaching: Reading data diffractively with Deleuzo-Guattarian concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, Å34(7), 565–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colwyn Deborah Martin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Martin, C.D., Martin, M. (2024). Enactments of Care in Early Childhood Education: Towards Inclusion and Transformation. In: Shaik, N., Moodley, T. (eds) Towards a Transformative Pedagogy for Early Childhood Care and Education. International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, vol 43. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59648-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59648-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-59647-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-59648-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation