SpringerLink
Log in

The Reputational Consequences of Polarization for American Foreign Policy: Evidence from the US-UK Bilateral Relationship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Polarization and US Foreign Policy

  • 20 Accesses

Abstract

How does partisan polarization in the United States affect foreign perceptions of its security commitments and global leadership? In a survey experiment fielded to 2000 adults in the United Kingdom, I demonstrate that priming respondents to think about US polarization negatively impacts their evaluations of the US-UK bilateral relationship. These impacts are stronger for the long-term, reputational consequences of polarization than for immediate security concerns. While foreign allies do not expect the United States to renege on existing security commitments, perceptions of extreme polarization make them less willing to engage in future partnerships with the United States and more skeptical of its global leadership. I find that these negative reputational consequences of polarization are driven by perceptions of preference-based, ideological polarization rather than identity-based, affective polarization. The results suggest that American allies anticipate that increasing divergence between the Republican and Democratic Party will create future uncertainty around US foreign policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aronow, P. M., Baron, J., & Pinson, L. (2019). A Note on Drop** Experimental Subjects Who Fail a Manipulation Check. Political Analysis, 27(4), 572–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmus, R. D. (2003). Rebuilding the Atlantic Alliances. Foreign Affairs, 82(5), 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, K., & N. Gaouette. (2020, October 31). How Biden Plans to Undo Trump’s “America First” Foreign Policy and Return US to World Stage. CNN.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC World Service. (2018, September 28). Live from Washington: Kavanaugh Vote Due. BBC News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, J. R., & Fleisher, R. (2000). Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era. CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxell, L., Matthew, G., & Shapiro, J. M. (2020). Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization. NBER working paper series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N. M., Sudman, S., & Wansink, B. (2004). Asking Questions: The Definitive Guide to Questionnaire Design. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brands, H. (2016). American Grand Strategy and the Liberal Order: Continuity, Change, and Options for the Future. Rand Corporation.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brands, H. (2017). The Unexceptional Superpower: American Grand Strategy in the Age of Trump. Survival, 59(6), 7–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, S. G., & Wohlforth, W. C. (2016). America Abroad: The United States’ Global Role in the 21st Century. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broz, J. L. (2002). Political System Transparency and Monetary Commitment Regimes. International Organization, 56(4), 861–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chayes, A. (2008). How American Treaty Behavior Threatens National Security. International Security, 33(1), 45–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coats, D. R. (2018). Worldwide Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Community. Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, A., & Nexon, D. (2020). Exit from Hegemony: The Unraveling of the American Global Order. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cowhey, P. F. (1993). Domestic Institutions and the Credibility of International Commitments: Japan and the United States. International Organization, 47(2), 299–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diermeir, D., & Li, C. (2019). Partisan Affect and Elite Polarization. American Political Science Review, 113(1), 277–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinic, M. (2015, October 14). Who Do the British Regard as Allies? YouGov Daily.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dueck, C. (2015). The Obama Doctrine: American Grand Strategy Today. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, G. C., & Barrett, A. (2000). Presidential Agenda Setting in Congress. In J. R. Bond & R. Fleisher (Eds.), Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era. Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fordham, B. O., and Flynn, M. (2023). Everything Old Is New Again: The Persistence of Republican Opposition to Multilateralism in American Foreign Policy. Studies in American Political Development, 37(1), 56–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedersdorf, C. (2018, January 23). Trump and Russia Both Seek to Exacerbate the Same Political Divisions. The Atlantic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaubatz, K. T. (1996). Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations. International Organization, 50(1), 109–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholz, E., & Press, D. (2010). Footprints in the Sand. American Interest, 5(4), 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, W. (2020). American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, B. E., Horiuchi, Y., & Matush, K. (2021). Does public Diplomacy Sway Foreign Public Opinion? Identifying the Effect of High-Level Visits. American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1342–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, S. B., Leeper, T. J., & Tilley, J. (2021). Divided by the Vote: Affective Polarization in the Wake of the Brexit Referendum. British Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 1476–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O. R. (2004). Public Opinion and Foreign Policy (revised ed.). University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff, M. (Ed.). (2005). American Exceptionalism and Human Rights. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The End of Liberal International Order? International Affairs, 94(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and Loathing Across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(7), 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kertzer, J. D. (2021a). Public Opinion About Foreign Policy. In L. Huddy, D. Sears, J. Levy, & J. Jerit (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kertzer, J. D. (2021b, September 2). American Credibility After Afghanistan: What the Withdrawal Really Means for Washington’s Reputation. Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kertzer, J. D. (2022). Re-assessing Elite-Public Gaps in Political Behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 66(3), 539–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kertzer, J. D., Powers, K. E., Rathbun, B. C., & Ravi, I. (2014). Moral Support: How Moral Values Shape Foreign Policy Attitudes. Journal of Politics, 63(3), 825–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khong, Y. F. (2014). Primacy or World Order? The United States and China’s Rise. International Security, 38(3), 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The Rational Design of International Institutions. International Organization, 55(4), 761–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupchan, C. A. (2020). Isolationism: A History of America’s Efforts to Shield Itself from the World. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupchan, C. A., & Trubowitz, P. L. (2007). Dead Center: The Demise of Liberal Internationalism in the United States. International Security, 32(2), 7–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupchan, C. A., & Trubowitz, P. L. (2010). The Illusion of Liberal Internationalism’s Revival. International Security, 35(1), 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauderdale, B. E., & Herzog, A. (2016). Measuring Political Positions from Legislative Speech. Political Analysis, 24(3), 374–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layne, C. (2009). America’s Middle East Strategy After Iraq: The Moment for Offshore Balancing Has Arrived. Review of International Studies, 35(1), 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeds, B. A., Mattes, M., & Vogel, J. S. (2009). Interests, Institutions, and the Reliability of International Commitments. American Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 461–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lelkes, Y., Sood, G., & Iyengar, S. (2015). The Hostile Audience: The Effect of Access to Broadband Internet on Partisan Affect. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L. (2016, November 8). The Whole World Is Glued to the US Election. Business Insider.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. D., Milner, H. V., & Peter Rosendorff, B. (2002). Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements. International Organization, 56(3), 477–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. L. (2000). Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L. (2015). I Disrespectfully Agree: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maxey, S. (2022). Finding the Water’s Edge: When Negative Partisanship Influences Foreign Policy Attitudes. International Politics, 59(5), 802–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, M., Leeds, B. A., & Carroll, R. (2015). Leadership Turnover and Foreign Policy Change: Societal Interests, Domestic Institutions, and Voting in the United Nations. International Studies Quarterly, 59(2), 280–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, F., & Smith, A. (2008). Punishing the Prince: A Theory of Interstate Relations, Political Institutions, and Leader Change. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (1990). Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War. International Security, 15(1), 5–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, P. (2019). International Hegemony Meets Domestic Politics: Why Liberals Can Be Pessimists. Security Studies, 28(3), 451–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrick, R. (2018). Towards the Extremes: The Impact of Partisan Polarization on International Cooperation. Presented at the 2018 Peace Science Society Annual Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrick, R. (2021). Do External Threats Unite or Divide? Security Crises, Rivalries, and Polarization in American Foreign Policy. International Organization, 4(75), 921–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrick, R., & Wang, C. (2024). Domestic Polarization and International Rivalry: How Adversaries Respond to America’s Partisan Politics. The Journal of Politics, 86 (1), 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. (2012). The Future of American Power: Dominance and Decline in Perspective. In J. M. McCormick (Ed.), The Domestic Sources of American Foreign Policy: Insights and Evidence (6th ed.). Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obama, B. (2002). Remarks by Barack Obama in Chicago on October 2, 2002. Transcript accessed from NPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peake, J. S. (2017). The Domestic Politics of US Treaty Ratification: Bilateral Treaties from 1949 to 2012. Foreign Policy Analysis, 13(4), 832–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peake, J. S. (2023). Dysfunctional Diplomacy: The Politics of International Agreements in an Era of Partisan Polarization. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peña, C. V. (2006). A Smaller Military to Fight the War on Terror. Orbis, 50(2), 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2018). An Examination of the 2016 Electorate, Based on Validated Voters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pialik, K. (2017, August 22). US Active-Duty Military Presence Overseas is at Its Smallest in Decades. Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1997). Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posen, B. R. (2007). The Case for Restraint. American Interest, 3(1), 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preble, C. A. (2009). Power Problem: How American Military Dominance Makes Us Less Safe, Less Prosperous, and Less Free. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp-Hooper, M. (2020, February 10). Saving America’s Alliances: The United States Still Needs the System That Put It on top. Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuters Staff. (2020, June 6). Protests Worldwide Embrace Black Lives Matter Movement. Reuters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D. (1985). A ‘Special Relationship’? America, Britain, and the International Order Since the Second World War. International Affairs, 62(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogowski, J. C., & Sutherland, J. L. (2016). How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization. Political Behavior, 38, 485–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schemm, P., Cunningham, E., O’Grady, S., & Taylor, A. (2021, January 7). US Allies React in Horror to Capitol Assault, Hold Trump Responsible. The Washington Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, K. A. (2017). Perils of Polarization for US Foreign Policy. The Washington Quarterly, 40(4), 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S. (2020, September 30). Is This American-Style Civilization? World Reacts to Presidential Debate. NPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, W. (2018, August 9). How We Got the Iran Deal and Why We’ll Miss It. Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J. (1991). Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolsky, R., & Miller, A. D. (2019, January 20). Trump Is Achieving His Goal of Being the Un-Obama, Except on Middle East wars. USA Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomz, M., & Weeks, J. L. P. (2020). Public Opinion and Foreign Electoral Intervention. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 856–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomz, M., Weeks, J. L. P., & Yarhi-Milo, K. (2020). Public Opinion and Decisions About Military Force in Democracies. International Organization, 74, 119–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallcott, J. (2020, June 17). Unquiet on the Western Front: Why the 74-Year Alliance Between Europe and America is Falling Apart. Time.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt, S. (2019, January 29). America Has a Commitment Problem. Foreign Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, S. W., & Abramowitz, A. I. (2017). The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the US Electorate. American Politics Research, 45(4), 621–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westwood, S. J., Peterson, E., & Lelkes, Y. (2019). Are There Still Limits on Partisan Prejudice? Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(3), 584–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wike, R., Fetterfolf, J., & Mordecai, M.. (2020, September 15). US Image Plummets Internationally as Most Say Country Has Handled Coronavirus Badly. Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittkopf, E. R. (1990). Faces of Internationalism: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarhi-Milo, K. (2018, December 12). After Credibility: American Foreign Policy in the Trump Era. Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • YouGov Staff. (2017, February 2). America’s Friends and Enemies. YouGov.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    Rachel Myrick

Authors
  1. Rachel Myrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Myrick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg, Germany

    Gordon M. Friedrichs

  2. American University, Washington, DC, USA

    Jordan Tama

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Myrick, R. (2024). The Reputational Consequences of Polarization for American Foreign Policy: Evidence from the US-UK Bilateral Relationship. In: Friedrichs, G.M., Tama, J. (eds) Polarization and US Foreign Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58618-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation