Introduction: Polarization and America’s Role in the World

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Polarization and US Foreign Policy

Abstract

Polarization in the United States has been on the rise for several decades. In this context, few observers expect politics today to stop “at the water’s edge,” as the old cliché goes. However, key questions about the relationship between polarization and U.S. foreign policy remain to be fully answered. To what extent are American ideas about foreign policy now polarized along partisan lines? How is polarization changing the foreign policy behavior of the U.S. Congress and President? And how is polarization altering the effectiveness of U.S. foreign policy and influencing America’s role in the world? This edited volume provides an overview of key debates and existing knowledge about these questions, highlights important new findings from recent research, and suggests avenues for further study of this increasingly important topic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Brazil)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (Brazil)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (Brazil)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This definition draws on Lee (2015).

  2. 2.

    Other scholars highlight limits in the extent of bipartisan foreign policy consensus or in the scope of the liberal international order even during the Cold War (Acharya, 2018; Rathbun, 2012; Allison, 2018); see also McCormick and Wittkopf (1990) and Meernik (1993).

References

  • Abramowitz, A. I., & Webster, S. (2016). The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies, 41, 12–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, A. (2018). The end of American world order (2nd ed.). Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, J. H., Gelpi, C., Feaver, P., Reifler, J., & Sharp, K. T. (2006). Foreign policy and the electoral connection. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 477–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alduncin, A., Parker, D. C. W., & Theriault, S. M. (2017). Leaving on a jet plane: Polarization, foreign travel, and comity in congress. Congress and the Presidency, 44(2), 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, G. (2018). The myth of the liberal order: From historical accident to conventional wisdom. Foreign Affairs, 97, 124–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amirfar, C., & Singh, A. (2018). The Trump administration and the “unmaking” of international agreements. Harvard International Law Journal, 59(2), 443–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerswald, D. P. (2006). Senate reservations to security treaties. Foreign Policy Analysis, 2, 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auerswald, D. P., & Campbell, C. C. (Eds.). (2012). Congress and the politics of national security. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bafumi, J., & Parent, J. M. (2012). International polarity and America’s polarization. International Politics, 49(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, M., & McCarty, N. (2016). Causes and consequences of polarization. In J. Mansbridge & C. J. Martin (Eds.), Political negotiation: A handbook (pp. 37–90). Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, M. A., & Potter, P. B. K. (2019). Media, public opinion, and foreign policy in the age of social media. The Journal of Politics, 81(2), 747–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumer, D. C., & Gold, H. J. (2010). Parties, polarization, and democracy in the United States. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berinsky, A. J. (2009). In time of war: Understanding American public opinion from World War II to Iraq. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, S. (2015). The dysfunctional congress. Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, S. (2018). Dodging the rules in Trump’s republican congress. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, S. A., & Maltzman, F. (2009). Advice and dissent: The struggle to shape the federal judiciary. Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broz, J. L. (2011). The United States Congress and IMF financing, 1944-2009. Review of International Organizations, 6, 341–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brulé, D. (2008). Congress, presidential approval, and U.S. dispute initiation. Foreign Policy Analysis, 4, 349–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, S. (2019). The politics of war powers: The theory and history of presidential unilateralism. University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, J., Kafura, C., Smeltz, D., Tama, J., Monten, J., Kertzer, J. D., & Helm, B. (2020). Coming together or coming apart? Attitudes of foreign policy opinion leaders and the public in the Trump era. Chicago Council on Global Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buys, C. G. (2017). An empirical look at U.S. treaty practice: Some preliminary conclusions. American Journal of International Law, 108, 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. E. (2016). Polarized: Making sense of a divided America. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E. G., & D'Amico, N. J. (2015). The new look in political ideology research. Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. G., & Scott, J. M. (Eds.). (2021). Congress and U.S. foreign policy: Activism, assertiveness, and acquiescence in a polarized era. Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruson, K., & Farrar-Myers, V. A. (2007). Promoting the president’s foreign policy agenda: Presidential use of executive agreements as policy vehicles. Political Research Quarterly, 60(4), 631–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cayton, A., & Dawkins, R. (2020). Incongruent voting or symbolic representation? Asymmetrical representation in congress, 2008–2014. Perspectives on Politics, 20(3), 916–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudoin, S., Milner, H. V., & Tingley, D. H. (2010). The center still holds: Liberal internationalism survives. International Security, 35(1), 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudoin, S., Milner, H. V., & Tingley, D. (2018). Down but not out: A liberal international American foreign policy. In R. Jervis, F. J. Gavin, J. Rovner, & D. N. Labrosse (Eds.), Chaos in the liberal order: The trump presidency and international politics in the twenty-first century (pp. 61–97). Columbia University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudoin, S., Milner, H. V., & Tingley, D. (2021). “America first” meets liberal internationalism. In The H-Diplo/ISSF policy series: America and the world: The effects of the Trump presidency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. D. (2005). Setting the agenda: Responsible party government in the U.S. house of representatives. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cutrone, E. A., & Fordham, B. O. (2010). Commerce and imagination: The sources of concern about international human rights in the U.S. Congress. International Studies Quarterly, 54(3), 633–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLaet, C. J., & Scott, J. M. (2006). Treaty-making and partisan politics: Arms control and the U.S. senate, 1960-2001. Foreign Policy Analysis, 2(2), 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, D. W. (2018). The polarization of U.S. alliances. The Washington Post, Last Modified May 7, 2018, accessed May 18, 2023. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2018/05/07/the-polarization-of-u-s-alliances/

  • Drezner, D. W. (2019). This time is different: Why U.S. foreign policy will never recover. Foreign Affairs, 98(3), 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, J. J., & Pearson-Merkowitz, S. (2023). The power of partisanship. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, C. (2016). Power without constraint: The Post-9/11 presidency and national security. University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteban, J.-M., & Ray, D. (1994). On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 819–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. L. (2012). Parties and leaders: Polarization and power in the U.S. House and Senate. In J. L. Carson (Ed.), New directions in congressional politics (pp. 65–84). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, E. J., Bail, C. A., Cikara, M., Ditto, P. H., Iyengar, S., Klar, S., Mason, L., McGrath, M. C., Nyhan, B., Rand, D. G., Skitka, L. J., Tucker, J. A., Van Bavel, J. J., Wang, C. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2020). Political sectarianism in America: A poisonous cocktail of othering, aversion, and moralization poses a threat to democracy. Science, 370(6516), 533–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, M. E. (2014). The international and domestic sources of bipartisanship in U.S. foreign policy. Political Research Quarterly, 67(2), 398–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fordham, B. O., & Flynn, M. (2021). Everything old is new again: The persistence of republican opposition to multilateralism in American foreign policy. Studies in American Political Development, 37(1), 56–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, L. L. (2015). Watchdogs on the hill: The decline of congressional oversight of U.S. foreign relations. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foyle, D. C. (2017). Public opinion and foreign policy. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, D. P., & Fix, M. P. (2016). The best of times and the worst of times: Polarization and presidential success in congress. Congress & the Presidency, 43, 377–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, G. M. (2021). U.S. global leadership role and domestic polarization: A role theory approach. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, G. M. (2022). The effects of polarization for U.S. foreign policy behavior in international negotiations: Revisiting the two-level game. International Studies Review, 24(1), viac010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2014). America in decay. Foreign Affairs, 93(5), 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, A. S., & Schickler, E. (Eds.). (2017). Governing in a polarized age: Elections, parties, and political representation in America. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldgeier, J., & Saunders, E. N. (2018). The unconstrained presidency: Checks and balances eroded long before Trump. Foreign Affairs, 97(5), 144–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gries, P. H. (2014). The politics of American foreign policy: How ideology divides liberals and conservatives over foreign affairs. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guisinger, A., & Saunders, E. N. (2017). Map** the boundaries of elite cues: How elites shape mass opinion across international issues. International Studies Quarterly, 61(2), 425–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, R. C. (2015). Obama at war: Congress and the imperial presidency. University Press of Kentucky.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, M. J., & Rudolph, T. J. (2015). Why Washington won’t work. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O. R. (2004). Public opinion and American foreign policy. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homan, P., & Lantis, J. S. (2020). The battle for U.S. foreign policy: Congress, parties, and factions in the 21st century. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, W. G., & Moe, T. M. (2020). Presidents, populism, and the crisis of democracy. Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, W. G., & Pevehouse, J. C. (2007). While dangers gather: Congressional checks on presidential war powers. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, S., & Wroe, A. (2016). Partisan polarization and US foreign policy: Is the centre dead or holding? International Politics, 53, 666–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2020). A world safe for democracy: Liberal internationalism and the crises of global order. Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, G. C. (2013). Partisan polarization in American politics: A background paper. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 43(4), 688–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, G. C. (2017). The triumph of polarized partisanship in 2016: Donald Trump’s improbable victory. Political Science Quarterly, 132(1), 9–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, G.-H., & Quirk, P. J. (2019). Division at the water’s edge: The polarization of foreign policy. American Politics Research, 47(1), 58–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R., Gavin, F. J., Rovner, J., & Labrosse, D. N. (2018). Chaos in the liberal order: The Trump presidency and international politics in the twenty-first century. Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kertzer, J. D., Brooks, S. G., & Brooks, D. J. (2021). Do partisan types stop at the water’s edge? Journal of Politics, 83, 1764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kertzer, J. D., & Zeitzoff, T. (2017). A bottom-up theory of public opinion about foreign policy. American Journal of Political Science, 61(3), 543–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E. (2020). Why we’re polarized. Avid Reader Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, S. E., Saunders, E. N., & Schultz, K. A. (2018). The ratification premium: Hawks, doves, and arms control. World Politics, 70(4), 479–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriner, D. L. (2010). After the Rubicon: Congress, presidents, and the politics of waging war. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kupchan, C. A., & Trubowitz, P. L. (2007). Dead center: The demise of liberal internationalism in the United States. International Security, 32(2), 7–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F. E. (2009). Beyond ideology: Politics, principles, and partisanship in the U.S. Senate. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F. E. (2015). How party polarization affects governance. Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 261–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F. E. (2016). Insecure majorities: Congress and the perpetual campaign. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, R. C., Mettler, S., & Roberts, K. M. (2021). Democratic resilience: Can the United States withstand rising polarization? Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, T. E., & Ornstein, N. J. (2012). It’s even worse than it looks. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, K., & Lantis, J. S. (2018). Are all foreign policy innovators created equal? The new generation of congressional foreign policy entrepreneurship. Foreign Policy Analysis, 14(2), 212–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, B. W., & Prins, B. C. (2016). When political gridlock reigns in presidential foreign policy: Policy availability and the role of Congress. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 46(4), 763–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maxey, S. (2020). The power of humanitarian narratives: A domestic coalition theory of justifications for military action. Political Research Quarterly, 73(3), 680–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, N. (2019). Polarization: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2016). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, J. M., & Wittkopf, E. R. (1990). Bipartisanship, partisanship, and ideology in congressional-executive foreign policy relations, 1947-1988. Journal of Politics, 52(4), 1077–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meernik, J. (1993). Presidential support in Congress: Conflict and consensus on foreign and defense policy. Journal of Politics, 55(3), 569–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, H. V., & Judkins, B. (2004). Partisanship, trade policy, and globalization: Is there a left–right divide on trade policy? International Studies Quarterly, 48(1), 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, H. V., & Tingley, D. H. (2010). The political economy of U.S. foreign aid: American legislators and the domestic politics of aid. Economics and Politics, 22(2), 200–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, H. V., & Tingley, D. (2015). Sailing the water’s edge: The domestic politics of American foreign policy. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Myrick, R. (2020). Do external threats unite or divide? Security crises, rivalries, and polarization in American foreign policy. International Organization, 75(4), 921–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrick, R., & Wang, C. (2024). Domestic polarization and international rivalry: How adversaries respond to America’s partisan politics. The Journal of Politics, 86(1), 141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nall, C. (2015). The political consequences of spatial policies: How interstate highways facilitated geographic polarization. Journal of Politics, 77, 394–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noel, H. (2013). Political ideologies and political parties in America. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, B. I., & Gilens, M. (2020). Democracy in America? What has gone wrong and what we can do about it. The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peake, J. S. (2023). Dysfunctional diplomacy: The politics of international agreements in an era of partisan polarization. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peake, J. S., Krutz, G. S., & Hughes, T. (2012). President Obama, the senate and the polarized politics of treaty-making. Social Science Quarterly, 93(5), 1295–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persily, N. (2015). Solutions to political polarization in America. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2018). Why do people belong to a party? Negative views of the opposing party are a major factor. Last Modified March 29, 2018, accessed February 15, 2024. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/29/why-do-people-belong-to-a-party-negative-views-of-the-opposing-party-are-a-major-factor/ft_18-03-29_otherparty_reps-dems/

  • Prather, L. (2024). Ideology at the water’s edge: Explaining variation in public support for foreign aid. World Development, 176, 106472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rathbun, B. C. (2012). Trust in international cooperation: International security institutions, domestic politics and American multilateralism. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathbun, B. (2016). Wedges and widgets: Liberalism, libertarianism, and the trade attitudes of the American mass public and elites. Foreign Policy Analysis, 12(1), 85–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathbun, B. C., Kertzer, J. D., Reifler, J., Goren, P., & Scotto, T. J. (2016). Taking foreign policy personally: Personal values and foreign policy attitudes. International Studies Quarterly, 60(1), 124–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raunio, T., & Wagner, W. (2020). The party politics of foreign and security policy. Foreign Policy Analysis, 16(4), 515–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudalevige, A. (2005). The new imperial presidency: Renewing presidential power after Watergate. University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, K. A. (2017). Perils of polarization for U.S. foreign policy. The Washington Quarterly, 40(4), 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. M., & Carter, R. G. (2014). The not-so-silent partner: Patterns of legislative–executive interaction in the war on terror, 2001–2009. International Studies Perspectives, 15(2), 186–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, B. (2016). Unorthodox lawmaking: New legislative processes in the U.S. Congress (Vol. 5). Sage CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeltz, D., Busby, J., & Tama, J. (2018). Political polarization the critical threat to US, foreign policy experts say. The Hill, Last Modified November 9, 2018, accessed August 23, 2023. https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/415881-political-polarization-is-the-critical-threat-to-us-foreign-policy/

  • Smeltz, D., Daalder, I., Friedhoff, K., Kafura, C., & Helm, B. (2020). Divided we stand: Democrats and republicans diverge on US foreign policy. Chicago Council on Global Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. S. (2014). The Senate syndrome: The evolution of procedural warfare in the modern U.S. Senate. University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J., Shapiro, R. Y., & Bloch-Elkon, Y. (2009). Free hand abroad, divide and rule at home. World Politics, 61(1), 155–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D. (2018). Trump, American hegemony and the future of the liberal international order. International Affairs, 94(1), 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svolik, M. W. (2019). Polarization versus democracy. Journal of Democracy, 30(3), 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tama, J. (2020). Forcing the president’s hand: How the US Congress shapes foreign policy through sanctions legislation. Foreign Policy Analysis, 16(3), 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theriault, S. M. (2008). Party polarization in congress. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Theriault, S. M. (2013). The Gingrich senators: The roots of partisan warfare in Congress. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thérien, J.-P., & Noël, A. (2000). Political parties and foreign aid. American Political Science Review, 94(1), 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurber, J. A., & Yoshinaka, A. (Eds.). (2015). American gridlock: The sources, character, and impact of political polarization. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trubowitz, P., & Harris, P. (2019). The end of the American century? Slow erosion of the domestic sources of usable power. International Affairs, 95(3), 619–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trubowitz, P., & Mellow, N. (2011). Foreign policy, bipartisanship and the paradox of post-September 11 America. International Politics, 48(2/3), 164–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallner, J. I. (2013). The death of deliberation: Partisanship and polarization in the United States Senate. Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt, S. M. (2019). America’s polarization is a foreign policy problem, too. Foreign Policy, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzelburger, G., & Böller, F. (2019). Bomb or build? How party ideologies affect the balance of foreign aid and defence spending. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westwood, S. J., Peterson, E., & Lelkes, Y. (2019). Are there still limits on partisan prejudice? Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(3), 584–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittkopf, E. R. (1990). Faces of internationalism: Public opinion and American foreign policy. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gordon M. Friedrichs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Friedrichs, G.M., Tama, J. (2024). Introduction: Polarization and America’s Role in the World. In: Friedrichs, G.M., Tama, J. (eds) Polarization and US Foreign Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58618-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation