Ethical Principles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical Reasoning in Forensic Science

Part of the book series: Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy ((LOET,volume 41))

Abstract

To present an overview of universal normative approaches to bioethics, this chapter focuses on the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights, October 2005) and a universal theory of bioethics enunciated in what is referred to as Principlism (Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics, 7th edn. Oxford University Press, New York, 2013). Bioethics emerged as a new discipline in the early1970s with Van Rensselaer Potter writing the first book on the subject. Potter describes bioethics as the combination of science and philosophy (Ten Have HAMJ. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 22(1):59–82, 2012). Potter (Cancer Res. 35:2297–2306, 1975) defined bioethics as “a new discipline that combines biological knowledge with a knowledge of human value systems in an open-ended biocybernetic system of self-assessment.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
EUR 42.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 74.89
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beauchamp, T.L. 1995. Principlism and its alleged competitors. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (3): 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. 2013. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Sue, and Niamh Nic Daeid. 2015. Time to think differently: Catalysing a paradigm shift in forensic science. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 370 (1674): 20140251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, Ruth, H. Ten Have, and E.M. Meslin. 2011. The Sage handbook of health care ethics. SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheeseman, Kelly, Claudia San Miguel, Durant Frantzen, and Lisa S. Nored. 2016. Everyday ethics for the criminal justice professional. 2nd ed. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, Stan, Shawn Mikulay, and Brent E. Turvey. 2013. Ethical issues for students of criminal justice. Ethical Justice: Applied Issues for Criminal Justice Students and Professionals. Elsevier Inc: 21–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, Judith A., and Elizabeth L. Montgomery, eds. 1994. The new dictionary of Catholic social thought. Liturgical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, Raanan. 1994. Medical ethics: Four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ 309 (6948): 184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inbau, Fred E. 1962. Public safety v. individual civil liberties: The Prosecutor’s stand. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science 53 (1): 85–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, Albert R. 1998. The birth of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, Albert R., Mark Siegler, and William J. Winslade. 2010. Clinical ethics: A practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, David F., Gerard Magill, and Henk Ten Have. 2013. Contemporary Catholic health care ethics. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Mairi, and Hub Zwart. 2009. Bioethics: An export product? Reflections on hands-on involvement in exploring the “external” validity of international bioethical declarations. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6: 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter Van, R. 1975. Humility with responsibility; a bioethics for oncologists. Cancer Research 35: 2297–2306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter Van, Rensselaer. 1988. Global bioethics: Building on the Leopold legacy. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheid, Daniel P. 2015. The cosmic common good: Religious grounds for ecological ethics. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Have, Henk A.M.J. 2012. Potter’s notion of bioethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22 (1): 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Have, Henk. 2016. Global bioethics: An introduction. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Have, Henk, and Michèle Jean. 2009. The UNESCO universal declaration on bioethics and human rights: Background, principles and application. Unesco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, Brent E., and Stan Crowder. 2013. Ethical justice: Applied issues for criminal justice students and professionals. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 2005. Universal declaration of bioethics and human rights. October 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ferrara, L. (2024). Ethical Principles. In: Ethical Reasoning in Forensic Science. Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy, vol 41. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58392-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation