Determination of the Preliminary Velocity Model Using Receiver Function Analysis Method with DEUNET Seismological Observation Network Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (ICEES 2023)

Abstract

The Western Anatolia and Aegean Region, renowned for its history of potent earthquakes, necessitates a specialized seismic velocity model for precise hazard assessments. This research leverages DEUNET Seismological Observation Network data to establish a region-specific velocity model. Fifteen teleseismic earthquakes (2019 to January 2023) were carefully selected, ranging from magnitudes 7.5–8.2, based on signal-to-noise ratios exceeding three. Epicentral distances spanned 30° to 90°. Station noise analysis involved choosing suitable earthquakes for spectral assessment. Steps included instrument response-based restitution and horizontal-to-radial/tangential component transformation (SAC software). Z components largely reflected direct P phases, while R components dominated Ps phases. ZRT to LQT rotation enabled Ps and P wave separation. The focus lay on P-SV-SH wave phases. L components conveyed strong P wave signals, while Q and T components featured converted S wave energy. Deconvolution effectively removed source and ray path contributions from L component P wave signals. The inversion performed subsequently determined the subsurface S-wave velocity structure based on depth. The station with the lowest signal-to-noise ratio, Çeşme, emerged from noise analysis. Receiver function analysis determined crust-mantle boundaries for DEUNET stations, indicating depths between 13 and 39 km.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 263.74
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gok E, Chávez-García FJ, Polat O (2014) Effect of soil conditions on predicted ground motion: case study from Western Anatolia, Turkey. Phys Earth Planet Inter 229:88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ammon CJ (1991) The isolation of receiver effects from teleseismic P waveforms. Bull Seism Soc Am 81:2504–2510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Langston CA (1979) Structure under Mount Rainier, Washington, inferred from teleseismic body waves. J Geophys Res 84:4749–4762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tezel T (2012) Anadolu plakası altındaki kabuk ve üst manto yapısının alıcı fonksiyon analizi ve yüzey dalgası tomografisi yöntemleri ile belirlenmesi. Ph.D. Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  5. Karabulut H, Paul A, Özbakır AD, Ergün T, Şentürk S (2019) A new crustal model of the Anatolia-Aegean domain: evidence for the dominant role of isostasy in the support of the Anatolian plateau. Geophys J Int

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yalçın GB (2020) Crustal properties in western anatolia and aegean sea revealed by joint inversion of P-receiver functions and P-wave polarisations. Master’s Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burdick LJ, Langston CA (1977) Modeling crustal structure through the use of converted phases in teleseismic body-wave forms. BSSA 67(3):677–691

    Google Scholar 

  8. Langston CA (1977) The effect of planar dip** structure on source and receiver responses for constant ray parameter. Bull Seism Soc Am 67:1029–1050

    Google Scholar 

  9. Langston CA (1981) Source inversion of seismic waveforms: the Koyna, India, earthquakes of 13 September 1967. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Owens TJ, Zandt G, Taylor SR (1984) Seismic evidence for an ancient rift beneath the Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee: a detailed analysis of broadband teleseimic P waveforms. J Geophys Res 89:7783–7795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Clayton RB, Wiggins RA (1976) Source shape estimation and deconvolution of teleseismic bodywaves. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 47:151–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Herrmann RB (2013) Computer programs in seismology an evolving tool for instruction and research. Seismol Res Lett 84:1081–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wessel P, Smith WHF, Scharroo R, Luis J, Wobbe F (2018) Generic map** tools: improved version released. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 94(45):409–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldstein P, Dodge D, Firpo M, Minner L (2003) SAC2000: signal processing and analysis tools for seismologists and engineers. In: Lee WHK, Kanamori H, Jennings PC, Kisslinger C (eds) The IASPEI international handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology. Academic Press, London, pp 1613–1614

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is a part of the Ph.D. thesis of Berkay Kalkar. DEUNET Seismological Observation Network was funded by the Dokuz Eylül Üniversity under the project number 2018.KB.FEN.008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Kalkar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kalkar, B., Gök, E. (2024). Determination of the Preliminary Velocity Model Using Receiver Function Analysis Method with DEUNET Seismological Observation Network Data. In: Erberik, M.A., Askan, A., Kockar, M.K. (eds) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. ICEES 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 401. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57357-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57357-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-57356-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-57357-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation