Abstract
This afterword calls for anti-imperial epistemic justice. In making this call, it is specifically concerned with knowledge production on rights and justice politics in most of the world. Anti-imperial epistemic justice calls time on the systemic epistemic erasure of the urgent demands of rights politics in most of the world. This rights politics in most of the world is heavily invested in ‘life rights’ including the right to life itself, which it seeks to realise through interweaving a whole spectrum of existing rights, including citizenship rights but also through envisioning new directions for rights thinking including bringing into being new rights. The new direction in rights and citizenship thinking destabilises the methodological nationalism of mainstream rights frameworks, queries its methodological abstraction and enables a vision outside of methodological individualism and towards rights and citizenship that encompass the planet.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press.
Arendt, H. (1973). The origins of totalitarianism [1951]. Harcourt Books.
Badiou, A. (2012). The rebirth of history: Times of riots and uprisings. Verso Books.
Balibar, É. (2013 [1994]). Masses, classes, ideas: Studies on politics and philosophy before and after Marx. Routledge.
Balibar, É. (2017). Citizen subject: Foundations for philosophical anthropology. Oxford University Press.
Benhabib, S. (1994). Democracy and Difference: Reflections on the Metapolitics of Lyotard and Derrida. Journal of Political Philosophy, 2(1), 1–23.
Brown, W. (2000). Suffering rights as paradoxes. Constellations, 7(2), 208.
Brown, W. (2004). The Most We Can Hope For...: Human Rights and the Politics of Fatalism. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 103(2), 451–463.
Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed. Columbia University Press.
Connell, R. (2014). Using southern theory: Decolonizing social thought in theory, research application.
Cusicanqui, S. R. (2012). Ch’ixinakax utxiwa: A reflection on the practices and discourses of decolonization. South Atlantic Quarterly, 111(1), 95–109.
Escobar, A. (2017). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.
Escobar, A. (2020). Pluriversal politics: The real and the possible. Durham: Duke University Press.
Grewal, I. (2005). Transnational America: Feminisms, diasporas, neoliberalisms. Durham: Duke University Press.
Grewal, I. & Kaplan, C. (1994). Introduction: Transnational feminist practices and questions of postmodernity. Scattered hegemonies: Postmodernity and transnational feminist practices (pp. 1–33).
James, C. L. R. (1989) [1938]. The Black Jacobins: Toussaint l’ouverture and the San Domingo revolution. Vintage.
Kapur, R. (2018). Gender, alterity and human rights: Freedom in a fishbowl. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Madhok, S. (2021). Vernacular rights cultures: The politics of origins, human rights, and gendered struggles for justice. Cambridge University Press.
Madhok, S. (2024). Anti-imperial epistemic justice and re-making rights and justice ‘after rights.’ The International Journal of Human Rights, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2023.2299669
McKittrick, K. (Ed.). (2015). Sylvia Wynter: On being human as praxis. Duke University Press.
Meister, R. (2010). After evil: A politics of human rights. Columbia University Press.
Mignolo, W. D. (2000). The Many Faces of Cosmo-Polis: Border Thinking and Critical Cosmopolitanism. Public Culture, 12(3), 721–748.
Mignolo, W. D. (2014). From “human rights” to “life rights”. In C. Douzinas & C. Gearty (Eds.), The meanings of rights: The philosophy and social theory of human rights. Cambridge University Press.
Mignolo, W. D. (2018). What Does It Mean to Decolonize? In On Decoloniality W. D. Mignolo, & C. E. Walsh, On Decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis, 105–134. Durham: Duke University.
Mills, C. W. (2017). Black rights/white wrongs: The critique of racial liberalism. Oxford University Press.
Mohanty, C. T. (1995). Feminist encounters: Locating the politics of experience (pp. 68–86). Beyond identity politics.
Moyn, S. (2018). Not enough. In Not enough. Harvard University Press.
Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Duke University Press.
Rancière, J. (2004). Who is the subject of the rights of man? South Atlantic quarterly, 103(2/3), 297–310.
Razack, S. (2004). Dark threats and white knights: The Somalia affair, peacekee**, and the new imperialism. University of Toronto Press.
Rege, S. (1998). Dalit women talk differently: A critique of ‘difference’ and towards a Dalit feminist standpoint position. Economic and Political Weekly, WS39–WS46.
Spivak, G. C. (2004). Righting wrongs. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 103(2), 523–581.
Tamale, S. (2020). Decolonization and afro-feminism. Daraja Press.
Trouillot, M. R. (1995). Silencing the past: Power and the production of history. Beacon Press.
Wynter, S. (2003). Unsettling the Coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation—An argument. The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 253–337.
Young, I. M. (1989). Polity and group difference: A critique of the ideal of universal citizenship. Ethics, 99(2), 250–274.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Madhok, S. (2024). Some Notes on Anti-imperial Epistemic Justice. In: Siim, B., Stoltz, P. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57144-2_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57144-2_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-57143-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-57144-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)