Intersectionality, Women, and Violent Politics in the Americas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Citizenship

Abstract

Violence against women in politics (VAWIP) is increasingly recognized as a global problem that threatens women’s ability to enact citizenship. Yet, an intersectional lens is seldom applied to understand whether the concept of VAWIP captures the differential impacts and experiences of gendered diversity. This chapter assesses the conversation on VAWIP as a concept in two arenas. First, the global discussion on VAWIP is located, in part, in a series of four documents that are representative of the broad, multi-layered, and multi-sited conversation about VAWIP. Second, it focuses the attention on two high-profile female politicians, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a US Congresswoman, and Francia Márquez, Colombia’s current vice president. It analyzes a set of their Twitter posts over a three-month period to understand their framing of VAWIP and their responses to it as it manifests for them. The intersectional analysis of their posts helps to trace where and how an intersectional lens shows up in this space. It also delineates how elements of gendered citizenship are enacted across multiple dimensions, and what forms they take when they are inclusive of diverse women’s voices.

I personally have experienced a lifetime of insults, racism and sexism.” (Quoted by PBS Newshour—https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-verbal-assault-against-women-not-new-and-that-is-the-problem-rep-ocasio-cortez-says)

US Rep. Barbara Lee.

As women in politics—and women of color—we are all too familiar with the vitriol and threats of violence that come with claiming our rightful place in the world,” (Quoted here: https://tlaib.house.gov/media/press-releases/tlaib-leads-introduction-resolution-calling-government-action-mitigate-violence)

Rep. Ayanna Pressley.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the Americas, which is the focus of this chapter, NDI has developed programs in Mexico, Cuba, Haiti, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela.

  2. 2.

    The information in the parenthesis denotes the political party (D for Democratic, R for Republican), the State, and the district number within that state.

  3. 3.

    Although other organizations such as UN Women, the Carter Center, ParlAmericas, and others have produced reports on VAWIP, the reach and policy-impact of those other documents is much more limited to the ones we analyzed or are focused on other regions of the world. The UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, Dubravka Šimonović, submitted to the UN General Assembly in 2018, is influenced by both the OAS Model Law and NDI documents. Furthermore, this report has not been as impactful as the ones we analyzed, despite the UN being a larger organization. For example, the legislative proposals developed in Latin America to address VAWIP are more likely to reference the Model Law, the Belem do Pará Convention in which it is based, or the studies by the NDI which are based on the documents we analyzed (Based on the one of the author’s research for another, ongoing project).

  4. 4.

    The document can be found here https://www.iknowpolitics.org/sites/default/files/tackling-violence-against-women-politics.pdf

  5. 5.

    This positionality places her on the far left of the U.S. political spectrum.

  6. 6.

    This refers to the January 6th insurrection.

References

  • Bardall, G., Bjarnegård, E., & Piscopo, J. M. (2020). How is political violence gendered? Disentangling motives, forms, and impacts. Political Studies, 68(4), 916–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjarnegård, E., & Zetterberg, P. (2023). Gender and violence against political actors. Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christofferson, A. (2021). The politics of intersectional practice: Competing concepts of intersectionality. Policy and Politics, 49(4), 573–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, A.-M. (2007). When multiplication doesn't equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krook, M. L. (2019). Global feminist collaborations and the concept of violence against women in politics. Journal of International Affairs, 72(2), 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krook, M. L. (2022). Semiotic violence against women: Theorizing harms against female politicians. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 47(2), 371–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krook, M. L., & Restrepo Sanín, J. (2016). Gender and Political Violence in Latin America: Concepts, Debates, and Solutions. Política y Gobierno XXIII (1): 125–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krook, M. L., & Restrepo Sanín, J. (2020). The cost of doing politics? Analyzing violence and harassment against female politicians. Perspectives on Politics, 18(3), 740–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuperberg, R. (2018). Intersectional violence against women in politics. Politics and Gender, 14(4), 685–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuperberg, R. L. (2022). World wide wrongs: Discrimination and online violence against women in politics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lépinard, É. (2014). Doing intersectionality: Repertories of feminist practices in France and Canada. Gender and Society, 28(6), 877–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Restrepo Sanín, J. (2022, November 11). Colombia 2021: Between crises and hope. Revista de ciencia política (Santiago) (ahead). http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-090X2022005000118&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en

  • Townsend-Bell, E. (2011). What is relevance? Defining intersectional praxis in Uruguay. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erica Townsend-Bell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Townsend-Bell, E., Restrepo Sanín, J. (2024). Intersectionality, Women, and Violent Politics in the Americas. In: Siim, B., Stoltz, P. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57144-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57144-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-57143-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-57144-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation