Abstract
Violence against women in politics (VAWIP) is increasingly recognized as a global problem that threatens women’s ability to enact citizenship. Yet, an intersectional lens is seldom applied to understand whether the concept of VAWIP captures the differential impacts and experiences of gendered diversity. This chapter assesses the conversation on VAWIP as a concept in two arenas. First, the global discussion on VAWIP is located, in part, in a series of four documents that are representative of the broad, multi-layered, and multi-sited conversation about VAWIP. Second, it focuses the attention on two high-profile female politicians, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a US Congresswoman, and Francia Márquez, Colombia’s current vice president. It analyzes a set of their Twitter posts over a three-month period to understand their framing of VAWIP and their responses to it as it manifests for them. The intersectional analysis of their posts helps to trace where and how an intersectional lens shows up in this space. It also delineates how elements of gendered citizenship are enacted across multiple dimensions, and what forms they take when they are inclusive of diverse women’s voices.
“I personally have experienced a lifetime of insults, racism and sexism.” (Quoted by PBS Newshour—https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-verbal-assault-against-women-not-new-and-that-is-the-problem-rep-ocasio-cortez-says)
US Rep. Barbara Lee.
“As women in politics—and women of color—we are all too familiar with the vitriol and threats of violence that come with claiming our rightful place in the world,” (Quoted here: https://tlaib.house.gov/media/press-releases/tlaib-leads-introduction-resolution-calling-government-action-mitigate-violence)
Rep. Ayanna Pressley.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the Americas, which is the focus of this chapter, NDI has developed programs in Mexico, Cuba, Haiti, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela.
- 2.
The information in the parenthesis denotes the political party (D for Democratic, R for Republican), the State, and the district number within that state.
- 3.
Although other organizations such as UN Women, the Carter Center, ParlAmericas, and others have produced reports on VAWIP, the reach and policy-impact of those other documents is much more limited to the ones we analyzed or are focused on other regions of the world. The UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, Dubravka Šimonović, submitted to the UN General Assembly in 2018, is influenced by both the OAS Model Law and NDI documents. Furthermore, this report has not been as impactful as the ones we analyzed, despite the UN being a larger organization. For example, the legislative proposals developed in Latin America to address VAWIP are more likely to reference the Model Law, the Belem do Pará Convention in which it is based, or the studies by the NDI which are based on the documents we analyzed (Based on the one of the author’s research for another, ongoing project).
- 4.
The document can be found here https://www.iknowpolitics.org/sites/default/files/tackling-violence-against-women-politics.pdf
- 5.
This positionality places her on the far left of the U.S. political spectrum.
- 6.
This refers to the January 6th insurrection.
References
Bardall, G., Bjarnegård, E., & Piscopo, J. M. (2020). How is political violence gendered? Disentangling motives, forms, and impacts. Political Studies, 68(4), 916–935.
Bjarnegård, E., & Zetterberg, P. (2023). Gender and violence against political actors. Temple University Press.
Christofferson, A. (2021). The politics of intersectional practice: Competing concepts of intersectionality. Policy and Politics, 49(4), 573–593.
Hancock, A.-M. (2007). When multiplication doesn't equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63–79.
Krook, M. L. (2019). Global feminist collaborations and the concept of violence against women in politics. Journal of International Affairs, 72(2), 77–94.
Krook, M. L. (2022). Semiotic violence against women: Theorizing harms against female politicians. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 47(2), 371–397.
Krook, M. L., & Restrepo Sanín, J. (2016). Gender and Political Violence in Latin America: Concepts, Debates, and Solutions. Política y Gobierno XXIII (1): 125–57.
Krook, M. L., & Restrepo Sanín, J. (2020). The cost of doing politics? Analyzing violence and harassment against female politicians. Perspectives on Politics, 18(3), 740–755.
Kuperberg, R. (2018). Intersectional violence against women in politics. Politics and Gender, 14(4), 685–690.
Kuperberg, R. L. (2022). World wide wrongs: Discrimination and online violence against women in politics.
Lépinard, É. (2014). Doing intersectionality: Repertories of feminist practices in France and Canada. Gender and Society, 28(6), 877–903.
Restrepo Sanín, J. (2022, November 11). Colombia 2021: Between crises and hope. Revista de ciencia política (Santiago) (ahead). http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-090X2022005000118&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
Townsend-Bell, E. (2011). What is relevance? Defining intersectional praxis in Uruguay. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 187–199.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Townsend-Bell, E., Restrepo Sanín, J. (2024). Intersectionality, Women, and Violent Politics in the Americas. In: Siim, B., Stoltz, P. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57144-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57144-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-57143-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-57144-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)