Abstract
This chapter aims to provide an overview of the meaning of the terms ‘nature’ and ‘natural’ as used by Smith in his moral philosophy in relation to human nature. Starting from a synthesis of a number of perspectives, as opposed to those that see nature unilaterally as an object of description or as a matrix of moral norms, I show in what sense nature could be a normative object amenable to description in Smith’s moral philosophy.
In particular, I describe the possibility of considering the relationship between nature and morality in a non-unilateral way. In doing so, I show how, for Smith, nature can express itself through morality; sometimes nature itself can be moral; or morality can express itself naturally or directly; at other times, differently, morality seems to correct aspects of nature. Within this framework, I emphasise that Smith does not reduce morality to what is natural in relation to the divine will or God. Rather, for Smith, the limits of descriptive knowledge of a normative nature open up the field of possibility for a different understanding of human beings in moral terms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See the introduction to the Glasgow Critical Edition p. 44 (TMS) and Montes (2004).
- 2.
I give one example of a possible reading of the complex logic of human nature in Smith. Human nature is characterised in part by the capacity to feel sympathy and passions, the object of sympathy. Assuming that passions and sympathy are central features of human nature, and adopting a perspective that focuses on the human being in relation to others, human nature can be defined as either subject or object, depending on whether it is embodied in the spectator or the agent: in this sense, given the viewpoint of the spectator and given its representative character of human nature, the human being who feels sympathy for the passion of the other is a subject who rejoins the object of himself through the other.
- 3.
See TMS, VII.ii.1.46.
- 4.
For example, Grotius had the merit of having founded positive law on natural jurisprudence, thus, on a set of legal principles at the basis of the law of every civil government (Grotius 1925).
- 5.
On Smith’s conception of naturalism, see Hanley (2010).
- 6.
On the normative role of laws, see TMS, II.ii.1.8.
- 7.
This moral effort to see a situation from an impartial point of view can become habitual, it is not always the object of an effort (TMS, III.3.29). For example, human mind is naturally inclined to become accustomed to general rules of conduct (TMS, III.4.12).
- 8.
On the spontaneous order, see Smith (2006).
- 9.
For Smith, sympathy is related not only to human nature, but also to historical context and personal history (for example, habits). In this sense, Smith recognises the possibility of different experiences of something arising from different personal experiences and a common human nature.
- 10.
At the same time, for Smith, ‘natural’ can mean what is habitual or normative (natural price) or what is spontaneous (natural propensity to barter).
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Grotius, Hugo. 1925. On the Law of War and Peace (1625). Trans. by Francis W. Kelsey, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Secondary Sources
Alvey, James. 2003a. Adam Smith: Optimist or Pessimist? A New Problem Concerning the Teleological Basis of Commercial Society. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
———. 2003b. Adam Smith’s View of History: Consistent or Paradoxical? History of the Human Sciences 16 (2): 1–25.
Berry, Christopher. 2018. Essays on Hume, Smith and the Scottish Enlightenment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Bobbio, Norberto. 1977. Giusnaturalismo e positivismo giuridico. Ivrea/Roma: Comunità.
Boyd, Richard. 2013. Adam Smith on Civility and Civil Society. In The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith, ed. Christopher Berry, Craig Smith, and Maria Pia. Paganelli, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Campbell, Tom. 1971. Adam Smith’s Science of Morals. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
Cropsey, Joseph. 1957. Polity and Economy. Leiden: Nijhoff.
Dafydd, Daniel. 2020. The Secularisation of Conscience. In Ethical Rationalism and Secularisation in the British Enlightenment. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dellemotte, Jean. 2002. Gravitation et sympathie. L’essai smithien d’application du modèle newtonien à la sphère sociale. Cahiers d’économie politique 42 (1), L’Harmattan, pp. 49–72.
Gascoigne, John. 2006. The Study of Nature. In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth Century Philosophy, ed. Knud Haakonssen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Griswold, Charles. 1999. Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haakonssen, Knud. 1981. The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1996. Natural Law and Moral Philosophy. From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2003. Giusnaturalismo e Teoria della Giustizia nell’Illuminismo scozzese. In Filosofia, scienza e politica nel Settecento brittanico, ed. Luigi Turco. Padova: Il poligrafo.
———., ed. 2006. The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hanley, Ryan. 2010. Skepticism and Naturalism in Adam Smith. In The Philosophy of Adam Smith, ed. Vivienne Brown and Samuel Fleischacker, 198–212. London: Routledge.
Herzog, Lisa. 2013. Inventing the Market. Smith, Hegel and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hill, Lisa. 2001. The Hidden Theology of Adam Smith. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 8 (1): 1–29.
Macfie, Alec. 1967. The Individual in Society. London: Allen & Unwin.
Mayr, Otto. 1988. La bilancia e l’orologio: libertà e autorità nel pensiero politico dell’Europa moderna. Bologna: il Mulino.
Montes, Leonidas. 2004. Adam Smith in Context. A Critical Reassessment of Some Central Components of His Thought. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2013. Newtonianism and Adam Smith. In The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith, ed. Christopher Berry and Maria Pia Paganelli. and Craig Smith, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Preti, Giulio. 1977. Alle origini dell’etica contemporanea. Adamo Smith. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
Schliesser, Eric. 2005. Some Principles Of Adam Smith’s Newtonian Methods In The Wealth Of Nations. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 23 (1): 33–74.
———. 2014. Newton and Newtonianism. In The Routledge Companion to Eighteenth Century Philosophy, ed. Aaron Garrett. New York: Routledge.
———. 2017. Adam Smith. Systematic Philosopher and Public Thinker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, Craig. 2006. Adam Smith’s Political Philosophy: The Invisible Hand and Spontaneous Order. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bonfiglioli, R. (2024). A Semantic Overview of ‘Nature’ and ‘Natural’ in Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy. In: Human Nature, Mind and the Self in Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56779-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56779-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56778-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-56779-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)