Abstract
Adequate and accurate information about the soil is one of the key basic fundamental factors for optimal decision-making and sustainably improving crop productivity. Contemporarily, advanced machine learning modelling techniques have been useful in delivering actionable information in various fields. In agriculture, soils in particular, the same has been the case in various tasks including soil nutrients analysis and fertility status predictions, as well as determination of appropriate crops for plantation, among others. There exists much exploration in regression models for soil nutrients, compounds, and their key chemical characteristics. However, varying predictive performances have been demonstrated by ML models for predicting soil fertility status. In addition, a range of varying fertility status levels have been synthesized and used for modelling classifiers targets for predicting soil fertility. This paper presents a high-performance throughput 2S-HHEC combining a neural network, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, and gradient boosting classifiers to predict soil fertility status with accuracy and Kappa score of 98.9% and 93.9% on test data.
References
FAO. (2018). Future of food and agriculture 2018: Alternative pathways to 2050. Food & Agriculture Org.
Massawe, B. H., Subburayalu, S. K., Kaaya, A. K., Winowiecki, L., & Slater, B. K. (2018). Map** numerically classified soil taxa in Kilombero Valley, Tanzania using machine learning. Geoderma, 311, 143–148.
Guo, J.-J., & Luh, P. B. (2004). Improving market clearing price prediction by using a committee machine of neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 19(4), 1867–1876.
Mduma, N. (2020). Data driven approach for predicting student dropout in secondary schools.,” PhD Thesis,. NM-AIST.
Leo, J., Luhanga, E., & Michael, K. (2019). Machine learning model for imbalanced cholera dataset in Tanzania. Scientific World Journal, 2019, 9397578.
Mollel, M., et al. (2019). Handover management in dense networks with coverage prediction from sparse networks. In 2019 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshop (WCNCW) (pp. 1–6).
Jayalakshmi, R., & Savitha Devi, M. (2022). Mining agricultural data to predict soil fertility using ensemble boosting algorithm. International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development IJICTHD, 14(1), 1–10.
Janvier, N., Arcade, N., Eric, N., & Jean, N. (2021). Machine learning based soil fertility prediction. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 8(7), 5.
Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Rizzo, R., Demattê, J. A. M., & Behrens, T. (2010). Spatial modeling of a soil fertility index using visible–near-infrared spectra and terrain attributes. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 74(4), 1293–1300.
**, Z., et al. (2019). Smallholder maize area and yield map** at national scales with Google earth engine. Remote Sensing of Environment, 228, 115–128.
Manjula, E., & Djodiltachoumy, S. (2017). Data mining technique to analyze soil nutrients based on hybrid classification. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 8(8).
Keerthan Kumar, T. G., Shubha, C., & Sushma, S. A. (2019). Random forest algorithm for soil fertility prediction and grading using machine learning. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9(1), 1301–1304.
Chaudhari, R., Chaudhari, S., Shaikh, A., Chiloba, R., & Khadtare, T. D. (2020). Soil fertility prediction using DM. Bulletin Monumental, 21(01), 8.
Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 337–355.
Pedregosa, F., et al. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830.
Alin, A. (2010). Multicollinearity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2(3), 370–374.
Escorcia-Gutierrez, J., Gamarra, M., Soto-Diaz, R., Pérez, M., Madera, N., & Mansour, R. F. (2022). Intelligent agricultural modelling of soil nutrients and pH classification using ensemble deep learning techniques. Agriculture, 12(7), 977.
Raskulinec, G. M., & Fiksman, E. (2015). SIMD functions via OpenMP. In High performance parallelism pearls (pp. 421–440). Elsevier.
Pearce, J., & Ferrier, S. (2000). Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using LR. Ecological Modelling, 133(3), 225–245.
Hengl, T., et al. (2015). Map** soil properties of Africa at 250 m resolution: Random forests significantly improve current predictions. PLoS One, 10(6), e0125814.
Acknowledgments
The work has been supported by the African Development Bank (AfDB), United Republic of Tanzania, through project No.: P-Z1-IA0-016 and grant No.: 2100155032816.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Malamsha, A.J., Dida, M.A., Moebs, S. (2024). 2-Stage Hybrid Ensemble-Based Heterogeneous Committee Machine for Improving Soil Fertility Status Prediction Performance. In: Marx Gómez, J., Elikana Sam, A., Godfrey Nyambo, D. (eds) Artificial Intelligence Tools and Applications in Embedded and Mobile Systems. ICTA-EMOS 2022. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56576-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56576-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56575-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-56576-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)