An Assessment of Fintech for Open Banking: Data Security and Privacy Strategies from the Perspective of Fintech Users

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 1153))

  • 72 Accesses

Abstract

The use of Fintech for open banking gradually increased as it allows consumers to share their data with third party providers and access their products and services. Due to a lack of trust in data security and privacy, there is a disinclination of consent to share personal data and a fear of losing control over the data hoarded during open banking. Despite significant research, there is still no research from the users’ cognitive and behavioural perspectives to demonstrate the challenges associated with Fintech use. This study presents a research model for assessing the position of Fintech in the open banking context, especially from the customers’ perspectives on data security and privacy issues. The article lays out the protocols and constructs relevant to the model. Using a quantitative approach, this study will collect data through online survey questionnaires and employ the structural equation modelling technique to test the model. This study is expected to help develop appropriate policies to enhance the use of Fintech by consumers in the Australian banking sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 136.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 171.19
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fracassi C, Magnuson W (2021) Data autonomy. Vanderbilt Law Rev 74(2):327–383

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown E, Piroska D (2022) Governing Fintech and Fintech as governance: the regulatory sandbox, riskwashing, and disruptive social classification. New Polit Econ 27(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1910645

  3. Solove DJ (2006) A taxonomy of privacy. Univ Pa Law Rev 154(3):477–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Porto F, Ghidini G (2020) “I access your data, you access mine”: requiring data reciprocity in payment services. IIC Int Rev Intellect Prop Compet Law 51:307–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-020-00914-1

  5. Aytaş B, Öztaner SM, Şener E (2021) Open banking: opening up the walled gardens. J Paym Strat Syst 15(4):419–431

    Google Scholar 

  6. Palmieri A, Nazeraj B (2021) Open banking and competition: an intricate relationship. In: EU and comparative law issues and challenges series, Osijek, JJ, Strossmayer University of Osijek, pp 217–237

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barr MS, DeHart A, Kang A (2019) Consumer autonomy and pathways to portability in banking and financial services. University of Michigan Center on Finance, Law & Policy Working Paper, University of Michigan Law & Economics Research Paper, no. 19-022. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3483757

  8. Borgogno O, Colangelo G (2020) Consumer inertia and competition-sensitive data governance: the case of open banking. J Eur Consum Mark Law 9(4):143–150. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3513514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang H, Ma S, Dai HN, Imran M, Wang T (2020) Blockchain-based data privacy management with nudge theory in open banking. Futur Gener Comput Syst 110:812–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. PwC (2020) Financial services technology 2020 and beyond: embracing disruption. 48

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang JS (2021) Exploring biometric identification in FinTech applications based on the modified TAM. Financ Innov 7(42). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00260-2

  12. Arner D, Buckley R, Charamba K, Sergeev A, Zetzsche D (2022) Governing Fintech 4.0: bigtech, platform finance, and sustainable development. Fordham J Corp Financ Law 27(1):1–71

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jenga L (2022) Open banking. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United States: Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cqu/detail.action?do-cID=7034203. Accessed 7 Aug 2022

  14. Stewart H, Jürjens J (2018) Data security and consumer trust in FinTech innovation in Germany. Inf Comput Secur 26:109–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-06-2017-0039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barbu CM, Florea DL, Dabija DC, Barbu MC (2021) Customer experience in Fintech. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res 16(5):1415–1433. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050080

  16. Chan R, Troshani I, Rao HS, Hoffmann A (2022) Towards an understanding of consumers’ FinTech adoption: the case of Open Banking. Int J Bank Mark 40:886–917. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-08-2021-0397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li G, Dai JS, Park EM, Park ST (2017) A study on the service and trend of Fintech security based on text-mining: focused on the data of Korean online news. J Comput Virol Hacking Tech 13(4):249–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-016-0288-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh S, Sahni MM, Kovid RK (2020) What drives FinTech adoption? A multi-method evaluation using an adapted technology acceptance model. Manag Decis 58:1675–1697. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2019-1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kassab M, Laplante PA (2022) Open banking: what it is, where it’s at, and where it’s going. Computer 55:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2021.3108402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ernst & Young Global Limited (2019) Global FinTech Adoption Index 2019. Ernst & Young Global Limited, London, UK. https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_gl/topics/banking-and-capital-markets/ey-global-fintechadoption-index.pdf. Accessed 7 Aug 2022

  21. Gomber P, Robert J, Kauffman C, Bruce WW (2018) On the Fintech revolution: Interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services. J Manag Inf Syst 35(1):220–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766

  22. Ng AW, Kwok BK (2017) Emergence of Fintech and cybersecurity in a global financial centre. J Financ Regul Compliance 25:422–434. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/10.1108/JFRC-01-2017-00132

  23. Kaabachi S, Ben MS, O’Leary B (2019) Consumer’s initial trust formation in IOB’s acceptance: the role of social influence and perceived compatibility. Int J Bank Mark 37:507–530. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-12-2017-0270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li Z, Li W, Wen Q, Chen J, Yin W, Liang K (2019) An efficient blind filter: location privacy protection and the access control in FinTech. Futur Gener Comput Syst 100:797–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.04.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee JM, Kim HJ (2020) Determinants of adoption and continuance intentions toward internet-only banks. Int J Bank Mark 38:843–865. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-07-2019-0269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.) New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kurniasari F, Tajul Urus S, Utomo P, Abd Hamid N, Jimmy SY, Othman IW (2022) Determinant factors of adoption of Fintech payment services in Indonesia using the UTAUT approach. Asia-Pac Manag Account J 17:97–125

    Google Scholar 

  28. Peong KK, Peong KP, Tan K, Tan Y (2021) Behavioural intention of commercial banks’ customers towards financial technology services. J Financ Bank Rev JFBR 5:10–27. https://doi.org/10.35609/jfbr.2021.5.4(2)

  29. Turner M, Kitchenham B, Brereton P, Charters S, Budgen D (2010) Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Inf Softw Technol 52:463–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roberts-Lombard M, Petzer DJ (2021) Relationship marketing: an S–O–R perspective emphasising the importance of trust in retail banking. Int J Bank Mark 39:725–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kelman HC (1958) Compliance, identification, and internalization: three processes of attitude change. J Conflict Resolut 2(March):51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Venkatesh V, Bala H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 39(2):273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

  33. Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci 46(2):186–204

    Google Scholar 

  34. Venkatesh V (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inf Syst Res 11(4):342–365

    Google Scholar 

  35. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27:425–478

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang Q, Li Y, Wang R, Liu L, Tan Y, Hu J (2021) Data security sharing model based on privacy protection for blockchain-enabled industrial internet of things. Int J Intell Syst 36:94–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.) Action-control. From cognition to behavior Heidelberg: Springer 11–39

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lai PC (2017) The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. J Inf Syst Technol Manag 14:21–38. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752017000100002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kassab M, Laplante P (2022) Trust considerations in open banking. IT Prof 24:70–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2021.3136015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yilmaz K (2013) Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. Eur J Educ 48(2):311–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. O’Leary Z (2021) The essential guide to doing your research project, 4th edn. SAGE Publications Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wahyuni D (2012) The research design maze: understanding paradigms, cases, methods and methodologies. J Appl Manag Account Res 10(1):69–80. https://ssrn.com/abstract=210308

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amila Munasinghe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Munasinghe, A., Grandhi, S., Imam, T. (2024). An Assessment of Fintech for Open Banking: Data Security and Privacy Strategies from the Perspective of Fintech Users. In: Lee, R. (eds) Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing . Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1153. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56388-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation