Abstract
The use of Fintech for open banking gradually increased as it allows consumers to share their data with third party providers and access their products and services. Due to a lack of trust in data security and privacy, there is a disinclination of consent to share personal data and a fear of losing control over the data hoarded during open banking. Despite significant research, there is still no research from the users’ cognitive and behavioural perspectives to demonstrate the challenges associated with Fintech use. This study presents a research model for assessing the position of Fintech in the open banking context, especially from the customers’ perspectives on data security and privacy issues. The article lays out the protocols and constructs relevant to the model. Using a quantitative approach, this study will collect data through online survey questionnaires and employ the structural equation modelling technique to test the model. This study is expected to help develop appropriate policies to enhance the use of Fintech by consumers in the Australian banking sector.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fracassi C, Magnuson W (2021) Data autonomy. Vanderbilt Law Rev 74(2):327–383
Brown E, Piroska D (2022) Governing Fintech and Fintech as governance: the regulatory sandbox, riskwashing, and disruptive social classification. New Polit Econ 27(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1910645
Solove DJ (2006) A taxonomy of privacy. Univ Pa Law Rev 154(3):477–564
Di Porto F, Ghidini G (2020) “I access your data, you access mine”: requiring data reciprocity in payment services. IIC Int Rev Intellect Prop Compet Law 51:307–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-020-00914-1
Aytaş B, Öztaner SM, Şener E (2021) Open banking: opening up the walled gardens. J Paym Strat Syst 15(4):419–431
Palmieri A, Nazeraj B (2021) Open banking and competition: an intricate relationship. In: EU and comparative law issues and challenges series, Osijek, JJ, Strossmayer University of Osijek, pp 217–237
Barr MS, DeHart A, Kang A (2019) Consumer autonomy and pathways to portability in banking and financial services. University of Michigan Center on Finance, Law & Policy Working Paper, University of Michigan Law & Economics Research Paper, no. 19-022. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3483757
Borgogno O, Colangelo G (2020) Consumer inertia and competition-sensitive data governance: the case of open banking. J Eur Consum Mark Law 9(4):143–150. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3513514
Wang H, Ma S, Dai HN, Imran M, Wang T (2020) Blockchain-based data privacy management with nudge theory in open banking. Futur Gener Comput Syst 110:812–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.09.010
PwC (2020) Financial services technology 2020 and beyond: embracing disruption. 48
Wang JS (2021) Exploring biometric identification in FinTech applications based on the modified TAM. Financ Innov 7(42). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00260-2
Arner D, Buckley R, Charamba K, Sergeev A, Zetzsche D (2022) Governing Fintech 4.0: bigtech, platform finance, and sustainable development. Fordham J Corp Financ Law 27(1):1–71
Jenga L (2022) Open banking. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United States: Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cqu/detail.action?do-cID=7034203. Accessed 7 Aug 2022
Stewart H, Jürjens J (2018) Data security and consumer trust in FinTech innovation in Germany. Inf Comput Secur 26:109–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-06-2017-0039
Barbu CM, Florea DL, Dabija DC, Barbu MC (2021) Customer experience in Fintech. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res 16(5):1415–1433. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050080
Chan R, Troshani I, Rao HS, Hoffmann A (2022) Towards an understanding of consumers’ FinTech adoption: the case of Open Banking. Int J Bank Mark 40:886–917. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-08-2021-0397
Li G, Dai JS, Park EM, Park ST (2017) A study on the service and trend of Fintech security based on text-mining: focused on the data of Korean online news. J Comput Virol Hacking Tech 13(4):249–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-016-0288-9
Singh S, Sahni MM, Kovid RK (2020) What drives FinTech adoption? A multi-method evaluation using an adapted technology acceptance model. Manag Decis 58:1675–1697. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2019-1318
Kassab M, Laplante PA (2022) Open banking: what it is, where it’s at, and where it’s going. Computer 55:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2021.3108402
Ernst & Young Global Limited (2019) Global FinTech Adoption Index 2019. Ernst & Young Global Limited, London, UK. https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_gl/topics/banking-and-capital-markets/ey-global-fintechadoption-index.pdf. Accessed 7 Aug 2022
Gomber P, Robert J, Kauffman C, Bruce WW (2018) On the Fintech revolution: Interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services. J Manag Inf Syst 35(1):220–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766
Ng AW, Kwok BK (2017) Emergence of Fintech and cybersecurity in a global financial centre. J Financ Regul Compliance 25:422–434. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/10.1108/JFRC-01-2017-00132
Kaabachi S, Ben MS, O’Leary B (2019) Consumer’s initial trust formation in IOB’s acceptance: the role of social influence and perceived compatibility. Int J Bank Mark 37:507–530. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-12-2017-0270
Li Z, Li W, Wen Q, Chen J, Yin W, Liang K (2019) An efficient blind filter: location privacy protection and the access control in FinTech. Futur Gener Comput Syst 100:797–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.04.026
Lee JM, Kim HJ (2020) Determinants of adoption and continuance intentions toward internet-only banks. Int J Bank Mark 38:843–865. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-07-2019-0269
Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.) New York: Free Press
Kurniasari F, Tajul Urus S, Utomo P, Abd Hamid N, Jimmy SY, Othman IW (2022) Determinant factors of adoption of Fintech payment services in Indonesia using the UTAUT approach. Asia-Pac Manag Account J 17:97–125
Peong KK, Peong KP, Tan K, Tan Y (2021) Behavioural intention of commercial banks’ customers towards financial technology services. J Financ Bank Rev JFBR 5:10–27. https://doi.org/10.35609/jfbr.2021.5.4(2)
Turner M, Kitchenham B, Brereton P, Charters S, Budgen D (2010) Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Inf Softw Technol 52:463–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.005
Roberts-Lombard M, Petzer DJ (2021) Relationship marketing: an S–O–R perspective emphasising the importance of trust in retail banking. Int J Bank Mark 39:725–750
Kelman HC (1958) Compliance, identification, and internalization: three processes of attitude change. J Conflict Resolut 2(March):51–60
Venkatesh V, Bala H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 39(2):273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci 46(2):186–204
Venkatesh V (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inf Syst Res 11(4):342–365
Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27:425–478
Zhang Q, Li Y, Wang R, Liu L, Tan Y, Hu J (2021) Data security sharing model based on privacy protection for blockchain-enabled industrial internet of things. Int J Intell Syst 36:94–111
Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.) Action-control. From cognition to behavior Heidelberg: Springer 11–39
Lai PC (2017) The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. J Inf Syst Technol Manag 14:21–38. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752017000100002
Kassab M, Laplante P (2022) Trust considerations in open banking. IT Prof 24:70–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2021.3136015
Yilmaz K (2013) Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. Eur J Educ 48(2):311–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12014
O’Leary Z (2021) The essential guide to doing your research project, 4th edn. SAGE Publications Ltd
Wahyuni D (2012) The research design maze: understanding paradigms, cases, methods and methodologies. J Appl Manag Account Res 10(1):69–80. https://ssrn.com/abstract=210308
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Munasinghe, A., Grandhi, S., Imam, T. (2024). An Assessment of Fintech for Open Banking: Data Security and Privacy Strategies from the Perspective of Fintech Users. In: Lee, R. (eds) Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing . Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1153. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56388-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56388-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-56387-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-56388-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)