Abstract
In this chapter, we focus on methodological aspects of pupillometry. We first survey existing types of equipment that allow the measurement of pupil size. We then discuss how a pupillometry experiment is first designed and subsequently set up in the controlled environment of a laboratory. We discuss pupillometry as a quantitative method that provides measurements on an interval scale (millimeters) that directly describes a real-world physical dimension (the size of the eye opening). Hence, statistical tests on quantitative data are typically used to compare results in each of the conditions of the experiment and to infer relationships between experimental conditions and behavior or physiology. Since there is no minimal pupil-size change that counts as a valid or meaningful pupillary signal (e.g., of increased mental effort or arousal), all pupil-size changes must be compared through inferential statistical methods to compare changes relative to a baseline or control condition while considering individual differences. We also discuss control and removal of potential artifacts when measuring the pupil in specific experimental situations. As we shall see, one needs to consider a variety of things and potential problems when doing a pupillometry experiment. However, many aspects are no different from hypothesis testing in any other field of empirical science.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The implementation details of commercial eye trackers are generally proprietary and not disclosed. Therefore, some of the information presented here is based on an educated guess of how the devices work based on their behavior.
References
Aguillon-Hernandez, N., Naudin, M., Roché, L., Bonnet-Brilhault, F., Belzung, C., Martineau, J., & Atanasova, B. (2015). An odor identification approach based on event-related pupil dilation and gaze focus. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 96(3), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.03.009
Aissou, M., Snauwaert, A., Dupuis, C., Atchabahian, A., Aubrun, F., & Beassier, M. (2012). Objective assessment of the immediate postoperative analgesia using pupillary reflex measurement: A prospective and observational study. Anesthesiology, 116, 1006–1012.
Aminihajibashi, S., Hagen, T., Folldal, M. D., Laeng, B., & Espeseth, T. (2019). Individual differences in resting-state pupil size: Evidence for association between working memory capacity and pupil size variability. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 140(1–7), 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.03.007
Aminihajibashi, S., Hagen, T., Andreassen, O. A., Laeng, B., & Espeseth, T. (2020). The effects of cognitive abilities and task demands on tonic and phasic pupil sizes. Biological Psychology, 156, 107945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107945
Barbur, J. (2004). Learning from the pupil: Studies of basic mechanisms and clinical applications. The Visual Neurosciences, 1, 641–656.
Bergamin, O., Zimmerman, M. B., & Kardon, R. H. (2003). Pupil light reflex in normal and diseased eyes: Diagnosis of visual dysfunction using waveform partitioning. Ophthalmology, 110(1), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01445-8
Bishop, L., Jensenius, A. R., & Laeng, B. (2021). Musical and bodily predictors of mental effort in string quartet music. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 653021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.653021
Bowman, H., Brooks, J. L., Hajilou, O., Zoumpoulaki, A., & Litvak, V. (2020). Breaking the circularity in circular analyses: Simulations and formal treatment of the flattened average approach. PLoS Computational Biology, 16(11), e1008286. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008286
Brisson, J., Mainville, M., Mailloux, D., Beaulieu, C., Serres, J., & Sirois, S. (2013). Pupil diameter measurement errors as a function of gaze direction in corneal reflection eyetrackers. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1322–1331.
Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.10. PMID: 31517183; PMCID: PMC6646942.
Carnegie, E., Marchant, D., Towers, S., & Ellison, P. (2020). Beyond visual fixations and gaze behavior: Using pupillometry to examine the mechanisms in the planning and motor performance of a golf putt. Human Movement Science, 71, 102622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2020.102622
Chiew, K. S., & Braver, T. S. (2013). Temporal dynamics of motivation–cognitive control interactions revealed by high-resolution pupillometry. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00015
Connelly, M. A., Brown, J. T., Kearns, G. L., Anderson, R. A., St Peter, S. D., & Neville, K. A. (2014). Pupillometry: A non-invasive technique for pain assessment in paediatric patients. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 99(12), 1125–1131. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306286
DiNuzzo, M., Mascali, D., Moraschi, M., Bussu, G., Maugeri, L., Mangini, F., Fratini, M., & Giove, F. (2019). Brain networks underlying Eye’s pupil dynamics. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 965. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00965
Ehlers, J., Strauch, C., Georgi, J., & Huckauf, A. (2016). Pupil size changes as an active Information Channel for biofeedback applications. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 41, 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-016-9335-z
Einhäuser, W., Stout, J., Koch, C., & Carter, O. (2008). Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(5), 1704–1709. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707727105
Ekman, I., Poikola, A., Mäkäräinen, M., Takala, T., & Hämäläinen, P. (2008). Voluntary pupil size change as control in eyes only interaction. In Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on eye tracking research & applications (pp. 115–118). ACM.
Ellingsen, D. M., Wessberg, J., Chelnokova, O., Olausson, H., Laeng, B., & Leknes, S. (2013). In touch with your emotions: Oxytocin and touch change social impressions. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 39, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.09.017
Ellis, C. J. (1981). The pupillary light reflex in normal subjects. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 65(11), 754–759. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.65.11.754
Endestad, T., Godøy, R. I., Sneve, M. H., Hagen, T., Bochynska, A., & Laeng, B. (2020). Mental effort when playing, listening, and imagining music in one Pianist’s eyes and brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 576888. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.576888
Franklin, M. S., Broadway, J. M., Mrazek, M. D., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). Window to the wandering mind: Pupillometry of spontaneous thought while reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(12), 2289–2294. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.858170
Gagl, B., Hawelka, S., & Hutzler, F. (2011). Systematic influence of gaze position on pupil size measurement: Analysis and correction. Behavior Research Methods, 43(4), 1171–1181. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0109-5
Hayes, T. R., & Petrov, A. A. (2016). Map** and correcting the influence of gaze position on pupil size measurements. Behavior Research Methods, 48(2), 510–527. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0588-x
Hershman, R., Henik, A., & Cohen, N. (2018). A novel blink detection method based on pupillometry noise. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-1008-1
Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1960). Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science, 132, 349–350.
Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1964). Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem solving. Science, 140, 1190–1192. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.143.3611.1190
Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1966). Changes in pupil size as a measure of taste difference. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23(2), 451–455.
Jainta, S., & Baccino, T. (2010). Analyzing the pupil response due to increased cognitive demand: An independent component analysis study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 77(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.03.008
Juvrud, J., Gredebäck, G., Åhs, F., Lerin, N., Nyström, P., Kastrati, G., & Rosén, J. (2018). The immersive virtual reality lab: Possibilities for remote experimental manipulations of autonomic activity on a large scale. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2018.00305
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Prentice Hall.
Kahneman, D., & Beatty, J. (1966). Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science, 154, 1583–1585. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1720478
Knapen, T., de Gee, J. W., Brascamp, J., Nuiten, S., Hoppenbrouwers, S., & Theeuwes, J. (2016). Cognitive and ocular factors jointly determine pupil responses under equiluminance. PLoS One, 11(5), e0155574. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155574
Laeng, B., & Endestad, T. (2012). Bright illusions reduce the eye’s pupil. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 109, 2162–2167.
Laeng, B., & Sulutvedt, U. (2014). The eye pupil adjusts to imaginary light. Psychological Science, 25(1), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613503556
Laeng, B., Ørbo, M., Holmlund, T., & Miozzo, M. (2011). Pupillary Stroop effects. Cognitive Processing, 12, 13–21.
Laeng, B., Sirois, S., & Gredebäck, G. (2012). Pupillometry: A window to the preconscious? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 18–27.
Laeng, B., & Alnæs, D. (2019). Pupillometry. In Klein, Christoph & Ettinger, Ulrich (Ed.), Eye Movement Research. Springer Nature.
Laeng, B., Eidet, L. M., Sulutvedt, U., & Panksepp, J. (2016). Music chills: The eye pupil as a mirror to music’s soul. Consciousness and Cognition, 44, 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.07.009
Laeng, B., Nabil, S., & Kitaoka, A. (2022). The Eye Pupil Adjusts to Illusorily Expanding Holes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 877249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.877249
Levatin, P. (1959). Pupillary escape in disease of the retina or optic nerve. Archives of Ophthalmology, 62, 768–799.
Liu, H., Laeng, B., & Czajkowski, N. O. (2020). Does stereopsis improve face identification? A study using a virtual reality display with integrated eye-tracking and pupillometry. Acta Psychologica, 210, 103142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103142
Loewenfeld. (1958). Mechanisms of reflex dilatation of the pupil. Historical reviewand experimental analysis. Documenta Ophthalmologica, 12, 185.
Loewenfeld, I. (1993). The pupil: Anatomy, physiology, and clinical applications. Wayne State University Press.
Lowenstein, O. (1954). Clinical pupillary symptoms in lesions of the optic nerve, optic chiasm, and optic tract. AMA Archives of Ophthalmology 52(3), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1954.00920050387006. PMID: 13188481.
Lowenstein, O., & Loewenfeld, I. E. (1958). Electronic pupillography. A new instrument and some clinical applications. AMA Archives of Ophthalmology, 59, 352.
Loweth, H. A. (1973). A device for continuous monitoring of pupil dilation. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 5, 473–474. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200237
MacLachlan, C., & Howland, H. C. (2002). Normal values and standard deviations for pupil diameter and interpupillary distance in subjects aged 1 month to 19 years. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 22(3), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00023.x
Mani, N., Schreiner, M. S., Brase, J., Köhler, K., Strassen, K., Postin, D., & Schultze, T. (2021). Sequential Bayes factor designs in developmental research: Studies on early word learning. Developmental Science, 24(4), e13097. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13097
Mathôt, S. (2013). A simple way to reconstruct pupil size during eye blinks (Version1). Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.688001.v1
Mathôt, S. (2020). Tuning the senses: How the pupil shapes vision at the earliest stage. Annual Review of Vision Science, 6, 433–451.
Mathôt, S., & Ivanov, Y. (2019). The effect of pupil size and peripheral brightness on detection and discrimination performance. PeerJ, 7, e8220. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8220
Mathôt, S., Melmi, J. B., & Castet, E. (2015). Intrasaccadic perception triggers pupillary constriction. PeerJ, 3(e1150), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1150
Mathôt, S., Grainger, J., & Strijkers, K. (2017). Pupillary responses to words that convey a sense of brightness or darkness. Psychological Science, 28(8), 1116–1124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617702699. Epub 2017 Jun 14. PMID: 28613135; PMCID: PMC5549816
Mathôt, S., Fabius, J., Heusden, E. V., & der Stigchel, S. V. (2018). Safe and sensible preprocessing and baseline correction of pupil-size data. Behavior Research Methods, 4, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-1007-2
Mathôt, S., Sundermann, L., & Rijn, H. van. (2019). The effect of semantic brightness on pupil size: A replication with Dutch words. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/689265.
Miles, K., McMahon, C., Boisvert, I., Ibrahim, R., de Lissa, P., Graham, P., & Lyxell, B. (2017). Objective assessment of listening effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG. Trends Hear, 21, 2331216517706396. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216517706396
Naber, M., & Nakayama, K. (2013). Pupil responses to high-level image content. Journal of Vision, 13(6), 7. http://www.journalofvision.org/content/13/6/7.full
Pearl, J. (2009). Causal inference in statistics. Statistics Surveys, 3, 96–146. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-SS057
Pelagatti, C., Binda, P., & Vannucci, M. (2020). A closer look at the timecourse of mind wandering: Pupillary responses and behaviour. PLoS One, 15(4), e0226792. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226792
Pirenne, M. H., & Denton, E. J. (1952). Accuracy and sensitivity of the human eye. Nature, 170(4338), 1039–1042.
Phillips, S. S., Mueller, C. M., Nogueira, R. G., & Khalifa, Y. M. (2019). A systematic review assessing the current state of automated pupillometry in the NeuroICU Neurocrit. Care, pp. 1–20.
Reilly, J., Kelly, A., Kim, S. H., Jett, S., & Zuckerman, B. (2019). The human task-evoked pupillary response function is linear: Implications for baseline response scaling in pupillometry. Behavior Research Methods, 51(2), 865–878. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1134-4
Rieger, G., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2012). The eyes have it: Sex and sexual orientation differences in pupil dilation patterns. PLoS One, 7(8), e40256. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040256
Rodney B., Murray, M. W., Adler, A., & Korczyn D. (1983). The Pupillary Effects of Oploids Life Sciences, 33(6), 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(83)90123-6
Rosnow, R., & Rosenthal, R. (1997). People studying people: Artifacts and ethics in behavioral research. W. H. Freeman and Company.
Sassenhagen, J., & Draschkow, D. (2019). Cluster-based permutation tests of MEG/EEG data do not establish significance of effect latency or location. Psychophysiology, 56(6), e13335.
Siegle, G. J., Ichikawa, N., Steinhauer, S. (2008). Blink before and after you think: blinks occur prior to and following cognitive load indexed by pupillary responses. Psychophysiology, 45(5), 679–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00681.x. Epub 2008 Jul 24. PMID: 18665867.
Smilek, D., Carriere, J. S. A., & Cheyne, J. A. (2010). Out of mind, out of sight: Eye blinking as indicator and embodiment of mind wandering. Psychological Science, 21, 786–789.
Stern, J. A., Boyer, D., & Schroeder, D. (1994). Blink rate: A possible measure of fatigue. Human Factors, 36(2), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089403600209
Tamietto, M., Castelli, L., Vighetti, S., Perozzo, P., Geminiani, G., Weiskrantz, L., & de Gelder, B. (2009). Unseen facial and bodily expressions trigger fast emotional reactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106(42), 17661–1766. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908994106. Epub 2009 Oct 5. PMID: 19805044; PMCID: PMC2764895.
Thompson, H. S., & Kardon, R. H. (2006). The Argyll Robertson pupil. Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology, 26(2), 134–138. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wno.0000222971.09745.91
Unsworth, N., & Robison, M. K. (2017). The importance of arousal for variation in working memory capacity and attention control: A latent variable pupillometry study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(12), 1962–1987. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000421
Unsworth, N., & Robison, M. K. (2018). Tracking arousal state and mind wandering with pupillometry. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(4), 638–664. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-0594-4
Unsworth, N., Robison, M. K., & Miller, A. L. (2019). Individual differences in baseline oculometrics: Examining in baseline pupil diameter, spontaneous eye blink rate, and fixation stability. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 20, 1074. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00709-z
Wardhani, I. K., Mathôt, S., Boehler, C. N., & Laeng, B. (2020). Effects of nicotine on pupil size and performance during multiple-object tracking in non-nicotine users. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 158, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.09.005. Epub Oct 17. PMID: 33080291.
Weiskrantz, L., Cowey, A., & Barbur, J. L. (1999). Differential pupillary constriction and awareness in the absence of striate cortex. Brain, 122, 1533–1538.
Wilhelm, B., Wilhelm, H., & Lüdtke, H. (1999). Pupillography: Principles and applications in basic and clinical research. In J. Kuhlmann & M. Böttcher (Eds.), (pp. 1–10). München, Germany: Zuckscjwerdt Verlag.
Whipple, B., Ogden, G., & Komisaruk, B. R. (1992). Physiological correlates of imagery-induced orgasm in women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 21, 121–133.
Winn, M. B., Wendt, D., Koelewijn, T., & Kuchinsky, S. E. (2018). Best practices and advice for using Pupillometry to measure listening effort: An introduction for those who want to get started. Trends in Hearing, 22, 2331216518800869. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518800869
Zhou, C., Lorist, M. M., & Mathôt, S. (2020). Eye movements in real-life search are guided by task-irrelevant working-memory content (p. 2020.05.18.101410). https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.18.101410
Zuber, B. L., Stark, L., & Lorber, M. (1966). Saccadic suppression of the pupillary light reflex. Experimental Neurology, 14(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4886(66)90087-2
Zwaan, R. A. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(5), 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.008
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laeng, B., Mathôt, S. (2024). Methodological Aspects of Pupillometry. In: Papesh, M.H., Goldinger, S.D. (eds) Modern Pupillometry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54896-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54896-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-54895-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-54896-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)