Abstract
The phenomenon of decision-making holds paramount significance within human behavior, signifying the act of selecting a singular course of action from an array of available alternatives. Its indispensability is pervasive across personal, professional, and societal contexts, rendering it an object of study across diverse disciplines, encompassing psychology, economics, and neuroscience. Though the decision-making sequence appears structured, factors im**ing upon decision quality are multifarious. Cognitive biases emerge as pivotal influencers, encompassing unconscious cognitive patterns dictating information processing and perception. Such biases engender suboptimal decision outcomes, often yielding far-reaching implications. Additionally, emotional influences, external pressures, and the intricacy of the predicament contribute to the decision’s complexion. Strikingly, decision-making amid stressful or pressured scenarios can spawn precipitous choices bereft of careful deliberation. In essence, decision-making serves as an integral facet of human behavior, involving the discernment and selection of optimal courses of action. This process, characterized by nuanced phases, interplays with diverse factors impacting the decision’s efficacy, encompassing cognitive biases, emotional resonances, external exigencies, and predicament intricacies. This scholarly analysis underscores the multidimensionality of decision-making and its profound implications within varied contexts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acciarini, C., Brunetta, F., & Boccardelli , P. (2021). Cognitive biases and decision-making strategies in times of change: a systematic literature review. Management Decision 59(3), 638–652.
Atsan N. (2016). Decision-making under stress and its implications for managerial decision-making: a review of literature. International Journal of Business and Social Research 6(3), 38.
Azadegan, A., Porobic, L., Ghazinoory, S., Samouei, P., & Kheirkhah, A.S. (2011). Fuzzy logic in manufacturing: A review of literature and a specialized application. International Journal of Production Economics 132(2), 258–270.
Blalock, S.J., & Reyna, V.F. (2016). Using fuzzy-trace theory to understand and improve health judgments, decisions, and behaviors: A literature review. Health Psychology 35(8), 781–792.
Boukezzoula, R., & Coquin, D. (2020). A decision-making computational methodology for a class of type-2 fuzzy intervals: An interval-based approach. Information Sciences 510, 256–282.
Bozdağ, C.E., Kahraman, C., & Ruan, D. (2003). Fuzzy group decision-making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry 51(1), 13–29.
Elwyn, G., Frosch, D., Thomson, R., Joseph-Williams, N., Lloyd, A., Kinnersley, P., Cording, E., Tomson, D., Dodd, C., Rollnick, S., Edwards, A., & Barry, M. (2012). Shared decision-making: a model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine 7(10), 1361–1367.
Grindle, M.S., & Thomas, J.W. (1989). Policy makers, policy choices, and policy outcomes: the political economy of reform in develo** countries. Policy Sciences 22(3/4), 213–248.
Korteling, J.E.H., Paradies, G.L., & Sassen-van Meer, J.P. (2023). Cognitive bias and how to improve sustainable decision-making. Frontiers in Psychology 14, 1129835.
Markowski, A.S., Mannan, M.S., & Bigoszewska, A. (2009). Fuzzy logic for process safety analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 22(6), 695–702.
Montero, J., & Ruan, D. (2010). Modelling uncertainty. Information Sciences 180(6), 799–802.
Savioni, L., Triberti, S., Durosini, I., & Pravettoni, G. (2023). How to make big decisions: A cross-sectional study on the decision-making process in life choices. Current Psychology 42, 15223–15236.
Siebert, J.U., Kunz, R.E., & Rolf, P. (2021). Effects of decision training on individuals’ decision-making proactivity. European Journal of Operational Research 294(1), 264–282.
Pantelić, S., Vulević, B., & Milić, S. (2023). Fuzzy decision algorithm for health impact assessment in a 5G environment. Applied Sciences 13(11), 6439.
Robles, J.M. (2007). Bounded rationality: a realistic approach to the decision process in a social environment. Theoria 16(1), 41–48.
Vargas-Hernández, J.G., & Ortega, R.P. (2018). Bounded rationality in decision-making. International Journal of Research in Business Studies and Management 5(10), 48–57.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kahraman, C., Haktanır, E. (2024). Decision-Making Under Fuzziness. In: Fuzzy Investment Decision Making with Examples. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54660-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54660-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-54659-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-54660-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)