Abstract
Under the auspices of the new public governance paradigm, co-production and cross-sector co-production are being announced as promising ways of revitalising democracy, fostering social innovation, and develo** efficient social services. As co-production is often initiated with the intention of making social services more relevant and responsive to the needs of service users, including the perspectives of citizens in vulnerable positions would seem essential. Yet, the matter of whether and how such inclusion is achieved in everyday organisational life remains insufficiently addressed—both among scholars and practitioners. Based on a three-year qualitative study of cross-sector co-production projects targeting vulnerable elderly citizens and refugees in a Danish municipality, this chapter explores how cross-sector co-production is practised across two fields of welfare service. It documents how an information gap, socio-material barriers, and cultural or cognitive barriers hamper the inclusion and participation in cross-sector co-production for both groups of citizens. Furthermore, the chapter shows how field-level differences in legitimacy and support entail inequality in how actors across fields address these gaps and barriers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23, 1119–1138.
Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2018). Definitions of co-production and co-creation. In T. Brandsen, B. Verschuere, & T. Steen (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public services (pp. 9–17). Routledge.
Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services: An introduction. Public Management Review, 8(4), 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030601022874
Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018). Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public services. Routledge.
Carlsen, H. B., Doerr, N., & Toubøl, J. (2020). Inequality in interaction: Equalising the helper–recipient relationship in the refugee solidarity movement. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00268-9
Diewald, M., & Faist, T. (2011). From heterogeneities to inequalities: Looking at social mechanisms as an explanatory approach to the generation of social inequalities.
Eliasoph, N. (2011). Making volunteers. In Making Volunteers. Princeton University Press.
Enjolras, B., & Strømsnes, K. (2018). The transformation of the Scandinavian voluntary sector. In Scandinavian civil society and social transformations: The case of Norway (pp. 1–24).
Espersen, H. H., Andersen, L. L., & Tortzen, A. (2021). Civil society organisations and municipalities in changing times: Potentials and pitfalls in the collaborative turn. In Voluntary and public sector collaboration in Scandinavia: New approaches to co-production (pp. 225–253).
Evers, A. (2020). Third sector hybrid organisations: Two different approaches. In Handbook on hybrid organisations. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Fehsenfeld, M., & Levinsen, K. (2019). Taking care of the refugees: Exploring advocacy and cross sector collaboration in service provision for refugees. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30, 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00097-5
Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2017). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. In Debating public administration (pp. 7–26). Routledge.
Flemig, S., & Osborne, S. P. (2019). The dynamics of co-production in the context of social care personalisation: Testing theory and practice in a Scottish context. Journal of Social Policy, 48(4), 671–697. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279418000776
Frederiksen, M., & Grubb, A. (2023). The politics of insufficiency: Ambivalence and boundary work in the co-production of welfare services. Public Management Review, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1978759
Frederiksen, M., Henriksen, L. S., & Grubb, A. (2021). Innovation without participation? The counterfactuals of community co-production. Voluntary and public sector collaboration in Scandinavia: New approaches to co-production (pp. 195–224).
Grubb, A., & Frederiksen, M. (2022). Speaking on behalf of the vulnerable? Voluntary translations of citizen needs to policy in community co-production. Public Management Review, 1–20.
Grubb, A., & Henriksen, L. S. (2019). On the changing civic landscape in Denmark and its consequences for civic action. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(1), 62–73.
Grubb, A., & Vitus, K. (2022). Civic integration through commissioned communities: On the cross-sector co-production of conditioned and clientised participation. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 12(3).
Henriksen, L., Grubb, A., & Frederiksen, M. (2023). Embedded and exterior practices of cross-sector co-production. The impact of fields. Journal of Social Policy.
Hustinx, L. (2010). Institutionally individualized volunteering: Towards a late modern re-construction. Journal of Civil Society, 6(2), 165–179.
Hustinx, L., & Lammertyn, F. (2003). Collective and reflexive styles of volunteering: A sociological modernization perspective. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 14(2), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023948027200
Hustinx, L., Grubb, A., Rameder, P., & Shachar, I. Y. (2022). Inequality in volunteering: Building a new research front. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 33(1), 1–17.
Ibsen, B. (Ed.). (2021). Voluntary and public sector collaboration in Scandinavia: New approaches to co-production. Palgrave Macmillan.
Ibsen, B., & Espersen, H. H. (2016). Kommunernes samarbejde med civile aktører: Forskelle og ligheder i forventninger, praksis, samarbejdspartnere og oplevet udbytte.
la Cour, A. (2019). The management quest for authentic relationships in voluntary social care. Journal of Civil Society, 15(1), 1–17.
Lichterman, P. (2006). Social capital or group style? Rescuing Tocqueville’s insights on civic engagement. Theory and Society, 35(5), 529–563.
Osborne, S. P. (2010). Conclusions: Public governance and public services delivery: a research agenda for the future. The New Public Governance? 429–444.
Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2013). Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. In Institutional logics in action, part B. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Pestoff, V. (2009). Towards a paradigm of democratic participation: Citizen participation and co-production of personal social services in Sweden. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80(2), 197–224.
Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: Some concepts and evidence. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23, 1102–1118.
Regeringen. (2017). Strategi for et stærkere civilsamfund. [Strategy for a stronger civil society]. Børne – og Socialministeriet. Accessed August 11, 2021, from https://www.regeringen.dk/aktuelt/publikationer-og-aftaletekster/strategi-for-et-staerkere-civilsamfund/.
Shachar, I. Y., von Essen, J., & Hustinx, L. (2019). Opening up the “black box” of “volunteering”: On hybridization and purification in volunteering research and promotion. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 41(3), 245–265.
Strokosch, K., & Osborne, S. P. (2016). Asylum seekers and the co-production of public services: Understanding the implications for social inclusion and citizenship. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279416000258
Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (2017). New public governance pĂĄ dansk. Akademisk forlag.
Tortzen, A. (2016). Samskabelse i kommunale rammer: hvordan kan ledelse understøtte samskabelse? PhD dissertation, Roskilde University Center.
Tortzen, A. (2017). Samskabelse som fortælling og praksis: Et kritisk blik på den aktuelle samskabelsesdagsorden. Uden for Nummer, 2017(34), 4–13.
Vanleene, D., Voets, J., & Verschuere, B. (2019). To empower & include: How professionals impact co-productive community development. In IIAS workshop on coproduction.
Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production: The state of the art in research and the future agenda. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 1083–1101.
Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2014). Co-creation in social innovation: A comparative case-study on the influential factors and outcomes of co-creation. IRSPM.
Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357.
Funding
This work was supported by the Velux Foundation [14400].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grubb, A. (2024). Mind the Gap Before the Bridge: On the Gaps and Barriers in Cross-Sector Co-production with Vulnerable Citizens. In: Evers, A., von Essen, J. (eds) The Interplay of Civic Engagement and Institutionalised Politics. Palgrave Studies in Third Sector Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54231-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54231-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-54230-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-54231-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)