Abstract
While civic engagement has been central to sha** Poland’s political landscape since the Solidarity revolution in the 1980s, it is also strongly influenced by the political context and highly dependent on legal and economic changes. This dependence is well illustrated by the 2015 power shift, after which Polish state institutions took a strong populist turn in terms of managing their relationship with civil society. This was accompanied by the populistic narratives enabled by a series of international and domestic crises. While taking a closer look at the changing relationship between civic engagement and institutional politics, this chapter illustrates how this relationship has been influenced by gradual regime transformation resulting in democratic backsliding. It argues that civic engagement has been not only a part but also a driver of that change, because without some of the civil society actors legitimising right-wing government actions, populist parties would not be able to change social perceptions so successfully. While trying to understand the diversity of civic engagement in recent years, this chapter also acknowledges the tradition of clientelist relations between political and civic spheres, resulting in pillarisation—the vertical segregation of civil society into distinct compartments with limited interaction across political, religious, or social boundaries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For example, the Instytut na Rzecz Kultury Prawnej Ordo Iuris (Ordo Iuris Institute for Legal Culture) published a list of organisations ‘suspicious’, suspected of promoting ‘gender ideology’, and ‘permissive model of sex education’ (Ordo Iuris, 2018, p. 3).
References
Anheier, H. K., Lang, M., & Toepler, S. (2019). Civil society in times of change: Shrinking, changing and expanding spaces and the need for new regulatory approaches. Economics E-Journal, 13(8), 1–27.
Arczewska, M., & Dudkiewicz, M. (2019). Strategie czy przystosowanie? Sytuacja organizacji pozarządowych w Polsce po 2015 roku [Strategies or adaptation? The situation of nongovernmental organizations in Poland after 2015]. Oficyna Wydawnicza “Impuls”.
Arczewska, M., Charycka, B., & Gumkowska, M. (2019). Kondycja organizacji równościowych. Raport z badań 2019 [The condition of equality organizations. Research report 2019]. Stowarzyszenie Klon/Jawor.
Bartkowski, J. (2003). Tradycja i polityka. Wpływ tradycji kulturowych polskich regionów na współczesne zachowania społeczne i polityczne [Tradition and politics. The impact of cultural traditions of Polish regions on contemporary social and political Behavior]. Wydawnictwo Akademickie Żak.
Bartkowski, J. (2006). Tradycja zaborów a współczesne zachowania społeczne w Polsce [Traditions of partitions and modern social behavior of Poles]. In J. Kurczewska (Ed.), Oblicza lokalności. Tradycja i współczesność [Different aspects of the local. Tradition and the present day] (pp. 267–302). Wydawnictwo Instytutu Filozofii i Socjologii PAN.
Batko-Tołuć, K. (2022, January 17). Rule of law and the civil society – Watchdog and national federation of Polish NGOs’ diagnosis (2021). Sieć Obywatelska Watchdog. Accessed September 10, 2023, from https://siecobywatelska.pl/rule-of-law-and-the-civil-society-watchdog-and-national-federation-of-polish-ngos-diagnosis-2021/?lang=en
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–762.
Bermeo, N., & Nord, P. (Eds.). (2000). Civil society before democracy: Lessons from nineteenth-century Europe. Rowman & Littlefield.
Bies, A. L. (2010). Evolution of nonprofit self-regulation in Europe. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(6), 1057–1086.
Bill, S. (2022). Counter-elite populism and civil society in Poland: PiS’s strategies of elite replacement. East European Politics and Societies, and Cultures, 36(1) February, first published online 16th September 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325420950800
Bloodgood, E., & Tremblay-Boire, J. (2017). Does government funding depoliticize non-governmental organizations? Examining evidence from Europe. European Political Science Review, 9(3), 401–424.
Carothers, T., & Brechenmacher, S. (2014). Closing space: Democracy and human rights support under fire. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., Lindberg, S. I., Teorell, J., Altman, D., Bernhard, M., Fish, M. S., Glynn, A., Hicken, A., Lührmann, A., Marquardt, K. L., McMann, K., Paxton, P., Pemstein, D., Seim, B., Sigman, R., Skaaning, S.-E., Staton, J., Wilson, S., Cornell, A., Gastaldi, L., Gjerløw, H., Ilchenko, N., Krusell, J., Maxwell, L., Mechkova, V., Medzihorsky, J., Pernes, J., von Römer, J., Stepanova, N., Sundström, A., Tzelgov, E., Wang, Y., Wig, T., & Ziblatt, D. (2019). V-dem dataset v9. Varieties of democracy (V-Dem) project. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemcy19
CSOSI. (2022). 2021 civil society organization sustainability index for Central and Eastern Europe and Eurasia. Accessed September 10, 2023, from https://www.fhi360.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/csosi-europe-eurasia-2021-report.pdf
Dejneka, P. (2016). Populizm emancypacjny a sfera publiczna, czyli kilka słów o “dobrym populizmie” we współczesnej dyskusji politycznej w Polsce. Przypadek KOD-u w kontekście “widma populizmu krążącego po Europie” [Emancipatory populism and the public sphere. Some remarks on “good populism” in the contemporary political debate in Poland: The case of KOD]. In J. Kurczewska & M. Karkowska (Eds.), Przemiany kulturowe we współczesnej Polsce. Ramy, właściwości, epizody [Cultural changes in Poland today: Frames, features, and episodes] (pp. 511–533). Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.
Dietrich, D. R. (2014). Rebellious conservatives: Social movements in defense of privilege. Palgrave Macmillan.
Domaradzka, A. (2021). Klucze do miasta. Ruchy miejskie w polu polityki miejskiej. Warsaw: Scholar.
Domaradzka, A., & Kołodziejczyk, M. (2023). Polish Civil Society 2015–2022: Steered from the top, reclaimed from the grassroots. In S. Hummel & R. Strachwitz (Eds.), Contested civic spaces: A European perspective (pp. 295–316). De Gruyter Oldenbourg. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111070469-013
Ekiert, G. (2020). Civil society as a threat to democracy: Organizational bases of the populist counterrevolution in Poland. CES open forum series 2019–2020. http://aei.pitt.edu/102615/1/Ekiert-Working-Paper-2020-Final.pdf
Ekiert, G., & Kubik, J. (1999). Rebellious civil society: Popular protest and democratic consolidation in Poland, 1989–1993. University of Michigan Press.
Ekiert, G., Kubik, J., & Wenzel, M. (2017a). Civil society and three dimensions of inequality in post-1989 Poland. Comparative Politics, 49(3), 331–350.
Ekiert, G., Kubik, J., & Wenzel, M. (2017b). Poland. In P. Vandor, N. Traxler, R. Millner, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Civil society in Central and Eastern Europe: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 76–91). ERSTE Foundation.
Falkenhain, M. (2020). Dividing lines: Understanding the creation and replication of fragmentations among NGOs in hybrid regimes. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(4), 663–673.
Ferfecki, W. (2020). Koła gospodyń wiejskich zdecydują, kto wygra wybory? [Are Farmers’ Wives’ Associations going to decide who wins the elections?]. Accessed September 10, 2023, from https://www.rp.pl/Polityka/200709453-Kola-gospodyn-wiejskich-zdecyduja-kto-wygra-wybory.html
Freedom in the World. (2023). Marking 50 years in the struggle for democracy annual survey of political rights and civil liberties. Accessed September 10, 2023, from https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2023-03/FIW_World_2023_DigtalPDF.pdf
Greskovits, B. (2020). Rebuilding the Hungarian right through conquering civil society: The Civic Circles Movement. East European Politics, 36(2), 247–266.
Hasmath, R., Hildebrandt, T., & Hsu, J. Y. J. (2019). Conceptualizing government-organized non-governmental organizations. Journal of Civil Society, 15(3), 267–284.
Huntington, S. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. Yale University Press.
Jabłoński, P., Olszówka, M., Zych, T., & Dziubicki, S. (2017). Obywatele dla demokracji. Ocena prawidłowości alokacji środków Mechanizmu Finansowego EOG (tzw. “funduszy norweskich”) przez Fundację im. Stefana Batorego oraz opis postulowanych zmian obecnego modelu [Citizens for democracy. Assessment of the allocation of funds from the EEA Financial Mechanism (the so-called “Norwegian funds”) by the Stefan Batory Foundation and a description of the proposed changes to the current model]. Instytut na rzecz Kultury Prawnej Ordo Iuris.
Jacobsson, K., & Korolczuk, K. (2017). Introduction: Rethinking Polish civil society. In K. Jacobsson & E. Korolczuk (Eds.), Civil society revisited. Lessons from Poland (pp. 1–35). Berghahn Books.
Jezierska, K. (2018). Performing independence. The apolitical image of Polish think tanks. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(3), 345–364.
Klon/Jawor. (2016a). Kondycja sektora organizacji pozarządowych w Polsce 2015 – raport z badań [Basic facts about nongovernmental organizations – A research report 2015]. Accessed September 10, 2023, from https://www.nck.pl/upload/attachments/318004/Raport_Klon_Kondycja_2015.pdf
Klon/Jawor. (2016b). Ochotnicze Straże Pożarne – lokalne centra kultury. Raport z badań [Basic facts about nongovernmental organizations – A research report 2016]. Accessed September 10, 2023, from https://www.nck.pl/en/badania/raporty/raport-ochotnicze-straze-pozarne-lokalne-centra-kultury#
Klon/Jawor. (2019). Kondycja organizacji pozarządowych [The condition of nongovernmental organizations]. Accessed September 10, 2023, from https://api.ngo.pl/media/get/108900
Kończal, K., & Wawrzyniak, J. (2018). Provincializing memory studies: Polish approaches in the past and present. Memory Studies, 11(4), 391–404.
Korolczuk, E. (2017). Społeczeństwo obywatelskie w Polsce–kryzys czy nowe otwarcie? [Civil society in Poland – Crisis or a new opening?]. Instytut Studiów Zaawansowanych Warszawa. Seria Analizy.
Korolczuk, E. (2019). Conference paper “Anti-elitism or elite substitution? The changing landscape of civil society in contemporary Poland”. Accessed September 10, 2023, from https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/PaperDetails/46305
Korolczuk, E. (2022). Challenging civil society elites in Poland: The dynamics and strategies of civil society actors. East European Politics and Societies. https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254221132282
Krygiel, P. (2015). Aktywność obywatelska w Polsce – co możemy zrobić? [Civic activity in Poland – What can we do?]. Instytut Sobieskiego.
Kurczewska, J. (2016). Wspólnoty pamięci lokalnej i narodowej. Kilka uwag o ich zbiorowym wytwarzaniu à la polonaise [Communities of local and national memory: A few comments about their collective formation à la Polonaise]. Teksty Drugie, 6, 30–51.
Kurczewski, J. (Ed.). (2003). Lokalne społeczności obywatelskie [Local civil societies]. Uniwersytet Warszawski – Instytut Stosowanych Nauk Społecznych, Ośrodek Badań Społecznych.
Kurczewski, J., & Kurczewska, J. (2001). A self-governing society twenty years after: Democracy and the third sector in Poland. Social Research, 68(4), 937–976.
Lewis, D. (2013). Civil society and the authoritarian state: Cooperation, contestation and discourse. Journal of Civil Society, 9(3), 325–340.
Marczewski, P. (2018). Freedom to exclude: Conservative CSOs in law and justice Poland. In R. Youngs (Ed.), The mobilization of conservative civil society (pp. 51–56). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Markowski, R. (2019). Creating authoritarian clientelism: Poland after 2015. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11, 111–132.
Markowski, R., Guasti, P., & Mansfeldová, Z. (2018). Backsliding into Authoritarian. Clientelism: The Case of Poland. Democracy under stress, 95–118.
Mirońska, D., & Zaborek, P. (2019). NGO – Business collaboration: A comparison of organizational, social, and reputation value from the NGO perspective in Poland. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(3), 532–551.
Moroska-Bonkiewicz, A., & Domagała, K. (2023). Opposing populists in power: How and why Polish civil society Europeanised their opposition to the rule of law crisis in Poland. Comparative European Politics, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-023-00339-3
NIW. (2017). Ustawa z dnia 15 września 2017 r. o Narodowym Instytucie Wolności – Centrum Rozwoju Społeczeństwa Obywatelskiego [Act of 15 September 2017 on the National Institute of Freedom – Center for Civil Society Development]. Accessed September 10, 2023, from http://dziennikustaw.gov.pl/DU/2017/1909
Novakova, N. (2023). The conservative-liberal clash resha** Poland’s civil society, transatlantic take. Accessed September 10, 2023, from https://www.gmfus.org/news/conservative-liberal-clash-resha**-polands-civil-society
Obolewicz, K., Pałasz, M., & Popiołek, M. (2023, September 10). Rola mediów społecznościowych w kryzysie migracyjnym na granicy Białorusi z Unią Europejską 2021/22. Analiza profili Straży Granicznej i Grupy Granica na Twitterze. Diploma.
Ochman, E. (2013). Post-communist Poland – Contested pasts and future identities. Routledge.
Onet. (2021). Wiceminister sprawiedliwości krytykuje Ostaszewską. “Pożyteczni idioci”. Onet.pl 15.11.2021. Accessed September 10, 2023, from https://kultura.onet.pl/film/wiadomosci/wiceminister-sprawiedliwosci-krytykuje-ostaszewska-pozyteczni-idioci/pjb3lj6
Ordo Iuris. (2018). “Chrońmy dzieci!” Podsumowanie kampanii [Let’s protect the children! Campaign summary]. Accessed September 10, 2023, from https://ordoiuris.pl/sites/default/files/inline-files/ChD_wyd_2.pdf
Osa, M. (2003). Networks in opposition: Linking organizations through activists in the Polish People’s Republic. In Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action (pp. 77–104).
Pacewicz, K. (2018). Młodzi popierają Czarny Protest i Ruch Narodowy, starsi – KOD i Rodzinę Radia Maryja. Sondaż OKO.press [The young support the Black Protest and the National Movement, the elders – KOD and the Radio Maryja Families. OKO. press survey]. Accessed September 10, 2023, from https://oko.press/mlodzi-popieraja-czarny-protest-ruch-narodowy-starsi-kod-rodzine-radia-maryja-sondaz-oko-press/
Pemstein, D., Marquardt, K. L., Tzelgov, E., Wang, Y., Medzihorsky, J., Krusell, J., & Miri, F.& von Römer, J. (2019). The V-dem measurement model: Latent variable analysis for cross-national and cross-temporal expert-coded data. V-dem working paper. No. 21 (4th ed.). University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute.
Platek, D., & Plucienniczak, P. (2017). Mobilizing on the extreme right in Poland: Marginalization, institutionalization and radicalization. In K. Jacobsson & E. Korolczuk (Eds.), Civil society revisited. Lessons from Poland. Berghahn Books.
Ploszka, A. (2020). Shrinking space for civil society: A case study of Poland. European Public Law, 26(4).
Roszczyńska-Kurasińska, M., Wnuk, A., Oleksy, T., & Domaradzka, A. (2023). Wsparcie udzielane uchodźczyniom i uchodźcom z Ukrainy – czynniki zaangażowania i wycofania oraz koszty i korzyści niesienia pomocy. In M. Rymsza (Ed.), W stronę środowiskowych usług społecznych. Deinstytucjonalizacja praktyk pomocowych w Polsce i Europie. WUW.
Ruzza, C. (2020). Civil society between populism and anti-populism. In O. C. Norocel, A. Hellström, & M. B. Jørgensen (Eds.), Nostalgia and hope: Intersections between politics of culture, welfare, and migration in Europe. Springer.
Schmitter, P. C. (1997). Civil society: East and West. In L. Diamond, M. F. Plattner, Y. W. Bruce, & M. Delli Carpini (Eds.), Consolidating the third wave democracies: Themes and perspectives. After broadcast news: Media regimes and the new information environment. Cambridge University Press.
Sienicki, Ł. (2019). Straż pożarna za rządów PiS-u [podsumowanie] [Fire brigades under PiS (summary)]. Accessed September 10, 2023, from https://remiza.com.pl/straz-pozarna-za-rzadow-pis-u-podsumowanie/
Skocpol, T., & Williamson, V. (2012). The Tea Party and the remaking of Republican conservatism. Oxford University Press.
Ślarzyński, M. (2018). Rola klubów “Gazety Polskiej” w sukcesie politycznym Prawa i Sprawiedliwości w 2015 roku. Aktorzy lokalni czy aktor ogólnokrajowej sfery publicznej III RP? [The role of Gazeta Polska clubs in the political success of the Law and Justice party in 2015. Local actors or an actor of the national public sphere of the Third Polish Republic?]. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 67(2), 139–158.
Ślarzyński, M. (2022). Transformation of civil society in Poland under the United Right government: From compartmentalization to political division. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 55(1), 131–154.
Strzelecki, M. (2020, June 10). Polish leader casts gays as enemy in bid to revive campaign. Bloomberg. Accessed September 10, 2023, from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-10/polish-leader-casts-gays-as-the-enemy-in-bid-to-revive-campaign?embedded-checkout=true
Szawiel, T. (2002). Podział na lewicę i prawicę w Polsce po 1989 roku – jego sens i trwałość [The left-right divide in Poland after 1989 – Its meaning and stability]. In R. Markowski (Ed.), System partyjny i zachowania wyborcze [Party system and voting behavior] (pp. 177–216). Instytut Studiów Politycznych PAN.
Theocharis, Y., Roberts, M., Barberá, P., & Tucker, J. (2017). From liberation to turmoil: Social media and democracy. Journal of Democracy, 28(4), 46–59.
Trochymiak, M., & Wróblewska, N. (2023). Współdziałanie i konflikt w zakresie działań pomocowych. Uwagi do procesu deinstytucjonalizacji na podstawie wniosków z badania punktu recepcyjnego dla uchodźczyń i uchodźców z Ukrainy. In M. Rymsza (Ed.), W stronę środowiskowych usług społecznych. Deinstytucjonalizacja praktyk pomocowych w Polsce i Europie. WUW.
Williams, B. A., & Carpini, M. X. D. (2011). After broadcast news: Media regimes, democracy, and the new information environment. Cambridge University Press.
Winiewski, M., Hansen, K., Bilewicz, M., Soral, W., Świderska, A., & Bulska, D. (2017). Mowa nienawiści, mowa pogardy. Raport z badania przemocy werbalnej wobec grup mniejszościowych. https://bip.brpo.gov.pl/sites/default/files/Raport%20Mowa%20Nienawi%C5%9Bci%2C%20Mowa%20Pogardy%2C%2027.02.2017.pdf
Wójcik, A., Pacewicz, P., & Jędrzejczyk, A. (2021). Bodnar: „Władza chce im zamknąć usta. Tyle i aż tyle”. Chcemy opisać i bronić osoby „na celowniku”. OKO Press. https://oko.press/bodnar-wladza-chce-im-zamknac-usta-tyle-i-aztyle-chcemy-opisac-i-bronic-osoby-na-celowniku
Załęski, P. S. (2012). Neoliberalizm i społeczeństwo obywatelskie [Neoliberalism and civil society]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
Żerkowska-Balas, M., Lyubashenko, I., & Kwiatkowska, A. (2016). Determinanty preferencji wyborczych: Polska w latach 1997–2015 [Determinants of electoral preferences: Poland in 1997–2015]. Studia Socjologiczne, 223(4), 69–96.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Domaradzka, A. (2024). Struggling with Pillarised Clientelism: Civil Society and Institutional Politics in Poland. In: Evers, A., von Essen, J. (eds) The Interplay of Civic Engagement and Institutionalised Politics. Palgrave Studies in Third Sector Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54231-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54231-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-54230-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-54231-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)