Abstract
The inclusion of a chapter on self-government in Scotland in this volume alongside the Åland Islands, the Faroe Islands and Greenland might, at first glance, be puzzling. The population of Scotland, at just under five and a half million people, is around 100 times that of the largest Greenland (56,000 inhabitants) and almost 200 times that of the smallest (Åland Islands, 30,000). Indeed, Scotland’s population is much closer to that of Finland (5.5 million) and Denmark (5.8 million), the core states from which the small Nordic autonomies derive their self-government. Nevertheless, there are some basic similarities across the cases which aid in our comparative attempts here. Each of the Nordic cases ‘are the result of top-down creation of autonomy under core state supremacy’ (Sundberg & Sjöblom, 2021) which was replicated in the United Kingdom (UK) under the constitutional reforms of the New Labour government in the late 1990s. In each of the cases, although the establishment of autonomous institutions initially seemed to pacify resident populations, bottom-up demand for further autonomy has increased—and, indeed, in the case of Scotland, led to a referendum on secession in 2014. In the Nordic cases, the degree of autonomy is high (Ackrén, 2009) and this is also comparable with the Scottish case. Also apparent is the degree of asymmetry within the core state. The cases here have more autonomy than other component parts of the core states, which also provides a further factor for analysis. And they each have movements that desire further autonomy and even secession from the core state. Of less relevance politically though still of note is that the Faroe Islands—and, indeed, Greenland—are closer to Scotland than they are to the core state (Denmark). Scotland does tend to take note of political developments within its Nordic neighbours. There were expressions of admiration for the ‘Nordic Model’ in 2014’s independence referendum—but this admiration was largely confined to the spending side of the ledger, with limited support for increasing taxation as a means of paying for vastly improved public services (Harvey, 2015; Keating & Harvey, 2014).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ackrén, M. (2009). Conditions for Different Autonomy Regimes in the World. A Fuzzy-Set Application. Åbo Akademi University Press.
Bogdanor, V. (2001). Devolution in the United Kingdom. Oxford University Press.
Convery, A. (2013, October 18). British Conservatism and Federalism: A Step Too Far? In Paper for Conference on Conservatives and Unionism in the 21st Century. Conservatives and Conservatism Specialist Group, Political Studies Association, University of Ulster Belfast Campus.
Dahl, R. (1956). A Preface to Democratic Theory. University of Chicago Press.
Dicey, A. V. (1915). Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Macmillan.
Easton, D. (1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. Prentice Hall.
Flinders, M. (2010). Constitutional Anomie. Government and Opposition, 44(4), 383–409.
Gamble, A. (2006). The Constitutional Revolution in the United Kingdom. Publius, 36(1), 19–35.
Harvey, M. (2011). How to Lose a Referendum in Seven Ways: Thoughts on the Upcoming Welsh Powers Referendum. Regional and Federal Studies, 21(1), 91–99.
Harvey, M. (2015). A Social Democratic Future? Political and Institutional Hurdles in Scotland. The Political Quarterly, 86(2).
Harvey, M. (2020). Devolution. In M. Keating (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Scottish Politics. Oxford University Press.
Herald. (2004, June 4). Sewel Motion Sends Same-Sex Couples Legislation to London. The Herald. Accessed September 15, 2023, from https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/12508209.sewel-motion-sends-same-sex-couples-legislation-to-london/
Keating, M. (2001). Plurinational Democracy: Stateless Nations in a Post-Sovereignty Era. Oxford University Press.
Keating, M., & Harvey, M. (2014). Small Nations in a Big World: What Scotland Can Learn. Luath Press Limited.
Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. Yale University Press.
Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. Yale University Press.
McEwen, N. (2022). Worth the Wait? Reforming Intergovernmental Relations. Blogpost on Centre on Constitutional Change website, published 14 January 2022. Accessed July 25, 2022, from https://www.centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk/news-and-opinion/worth-wait-reforming-intergovernmental-relations
Office for National Statistics. (2023a). National Life Tables – Life Expectancy in the UK: 2018–2020. Online. Accessed September 15, 2023, from https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/lifeexpectancies/bulletins/nationallifetablesunitedkingdom/2018to2020
Office for National Statistics. (2023b). ILO Unemployment Rate: Scotland. Online. Accessed September 15, 2023, from https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peoplenotinwork/unemployment/timeseries/ycnn/lms
Rezvani, D. A. (2014). Surpassing the Sovereign State. The Wealth, Self-Rule, and Security Advantages of Partially Independent Territories. Oxford University Press.
Riker, W. (1982). Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Freeman.
Shugart, M., & Taagepera, R. (2020, August ). Predicting Party Systems from Electoral Systems. Oxford Research Encyclopaedia. Politics. Online publication.
Steiner, J. (1972). The Principles of Majority and Proportionality. British Journal of Political Science, 1(1), 63–70.
Sundberg, J., & Sjöblom, S. (2021, August–September). Quality of Self-Government in three Nordic regions. In Paper Presented at the General Conference of the European Consortium of Political Research, Virtual Event.
Trench, A. (2010). Wales and the Westminster Model. Parliamentary Affairs, 63(1), 117–133.
UKHL. (2005, October 13). 56 [9] (Regina [on the Application of Jackson and Others] v Attorney General) (Lord Bingham).
What Scotland Thinks. (2015, April 23). Are You in Favour or Do You Oppose Scotland Having Full Fiscal Autonomy? Panelbase. Accessed August 1, 2022, from https://whatscotlandthinks.org/questions/are-you-in-favour-or-do-you-oppose-scotland-having-full-fiscal-autonomy/
What Scotland Thinks. (2020a, January 22). If It Continues, Should the Scottish Parliament Be Given More Powers, Less Powers, or the Same Powers as Now. Survation. Accessed August 1, 2022, from https://whatscotlandthinks.org/questions/if-it-continues-should-the-scottish-parliament-be-given-more-powers-less-powers-or-the-same-powers-as-now/
What Scotland Thinks. (2020b, March 18). Is the Scottish Parliament Giving Scotland a Stronger or Weaker Voice in the UK? ScotCen/Scottish Attitudes Survey. Accessed August 1, 2022, from https://whatscotlandthinks.org/questions/willis-the-scottish-parliament-giving-scotland-stronger-or-weaker-voice-in-uk-5/
What Scotland Thinks. (2022a, June 28). To What Extent Do You Support or Oppose the Concept of ‘Devo Max’?. ComRes. Accessed August 1, 2022, from https://whatscotlandthinks.org/questions/to-what-extent-do-you-support-or-oppose-the-concept-of-devo-max/
What Scotland Thinks. (2022b, July 1). How Would You Vote in a Scottish Independence Referendum If Held Now? Various Pollsters. Accessed August 1, 2022, from https://whatscotlandthinks.org/questions/how-would-you-vote-in-the-in-a-scottish-independence-referendum-if-held-now-ask/?removed
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harvey, M. (2024). ‘Good Governance’ and Entrenched Self-Government in Scotland: A Success?. In: Sundberg, J., Sjöblom, S. (eds) Governing Partially Independent Nation-Territories. Palgrave Studies in Sub-National Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54176-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54176-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-54175-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-54176-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)